Abstract
In this chapter we take up the questions: (1) How do youth work to transform their science learning as participation through the dialectical, hybrid practices as they engage in community-based participatory research projects in a youth-based afterschool program called Green Energy Technologies in the City (GET City)?; and (2) How do youth expand their identities through the dialectical, hybrid practices? Drawing upon critically oriented frameworks for understanding the relationships among place and learning, this 2-year longitudinal study of youth in an afterschool program shows how place facilitates and constrains participatory learning by the contextual scaffolds it gives rise to. We explore how place shapes the process by which youth worked to transform their participation, and how youth hybrid practices are layered into their identity development with and in a place.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arenas, A. (1999, April). If we all go global, what happens to the local? In defense of a pedagogy of place. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Comparative and International Education Society, Toronto, Canada.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, S. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
Calabrese Barton, A. (2003). Teaching science for social justice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Calabrese Barton, A., & Brickhouse, N. (2006). Engaging girls in science. In C. Skelton, B. Francis, & L. Smulyan (Eds.), Gender and education handbook (pp. 221–233). London: Sage.
Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2008, May). Where da heat go? Developing critical science agency through student directed science documentaries on urban heat islands. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting. New York, NY.
Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1–37). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Environmental Protection Agency. (2008). Reducing urban heat islands: Compendium of strategies. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/heatislands/resources/pdf/BasicsCompendium.pdf
Gruenewald, D. (2003). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 3–12.
Gutiérrez, K. D. (2002, November). Rethinking critical literacy in hard times: Critical literacy as transformative social practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers of English, Atlanta, GA.
Gutiérrez, K. D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164.
Gutiérrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25.
Hammond, L. (2001). Notes from California: An anthropological approach to urban science education for language minority families. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(9), 983–1000.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, C., & Majors, Y. (2003). ‘Heading up the street:’ Localised opportunities for shared constructions of knowledge. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 11(1), 49–69.
Lim, M., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2006). Science learning and a sense of place in an urban middle school. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(1), 107–141.
Moje, E., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R., & Marx, R. (2001). “Maestro, what is ‘quality’?” language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 469–498.
Moje, E. B., Ciechanowski, K. M., Kramer, K., Ellis, L., Carrillo, R., & Collazo, T. (2004). Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(1), 38–70.
Nasir, N. S., & Hand, V. M. (2006). Exploring sociocultural perspectives on race, culture, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 449–475.
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60–92.
Sanger, M. (1998). Sense of place and education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 29(1), 4–8.
Seiler, G. (2001). Reversing the standard direction: Science emerging from the lives of African American students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(9), 1000–1014.
Smith, G. A. (2002). Place-based education: Learning to be where we are. Phi Delta Kappa, 83(8), 584–594.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Thomson, N. (2003). Science education researchers as orthographers: Documenting Keiyo (Kenya) knowledge, learning and narratives about snakes. International Journal of Science Education, 25(1), 89–115.
Trueba, H. T. (1999). Critical ethnography and a Vygotskian pedagogy of hope: The empowerment of Mexican immigrant children. Qualitative Studies in Education, 12(6), 591–614.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lim, M., Tan, E., Barton, A.C. (2013). Science Learning as Participation with and in a Place. In: Bianchini, J.A., Akerson, V.L., Barton, A.C., Lee, O., Rodriguez, A.J. (eds) Moving the Equity Agenda Forward. Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4467-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4467-7_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4466-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4467-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)