Abstract
In his paper “On the Intrinsic Value of Information Objects and the Infosphere,” Luciano Floridi asserts that the goal of Information Ethics (IE) “is to fill an ‘ethical vacuum’ brought to light by the ICT revolution, to paraphrase Moor” (1985). He claims “IE will prove its value only if its applications bear fruit. This is the work that needs to be done in the near future” (Floridi 2002). Our chapter proposes to do part of that work. Initially we focus on Floridi’s Method of Levels of Abstraction (LoA). We begin by examining his methodology as it was first developed with J. W. Sanders in “The Method of Abstraction” (Floridi and Sanders 2004) and expanded in “The Method of Levels of Abstraction” (Floridi 2008a, b). Then we will demonstrate the general applicability and ethical utility of the method of levels of abstraction by considering three different computational paradigms: artificial agents, cloud computing, and quantum computing. In particular, we examine artificial agents as systems that embody the traditional digital computer (modeled as a single Turing machine). This builds on previous work by Floridi and Sanders (2004) and Grodzinsky et al. (2008). New contributions of this chapter include the application of the method of levels of abstraction to the developing paradigm of cloud computing and to the nascent paradigm of quantum computing. In all three paradigms, we emphasize aspects that highlight ethical issues.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Note that we are referring to computational nondeterminism. Computational nondeterminism is a theoretical construct that allows a device to be in two or more states simultaneously, with each state experiencing independent sets of inputs and producing independent sets of outputs. This notion is not to be confused with the philosophical notion of nondeterminism.
References
Berl, A., E. Gelenbe, M. Di Girolamo, G. Giuliani, H. De Meer, M. Dang, and K. Pentikousis. 2010. Energy-efficient cloud computing. The Computer Journal 53(7): 1045–1051.
Blatt, R. 2005. Quantum information processing: Dream and realization. In Entangled world: The fascination of quantum information and computation, ed. J. Audretsch, 235–270. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
Brey, P. 2010. Values in technology and disclosive computer ethics. In The Cambridge handbook of information and computer ethics, ed. L. Floridi, 41–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Esfeld, M. 2005. Quantum theory: A challenge for philosophy! In Entangled world: The fascination of quantum information and computation, ed. J. Audretsch, 271–296. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
Floridi, L. 2002. On the intrinsic value of information objects and the infosphere. Ethics and Information Technology 4(4): 287–304. doi:10.1023/A:1021342422699.
Floridi, L. 2005. Information ethics, its nature and scope. Computers and Society 35(2): 3. June 2005.
Floridi, L. 2008a. Foundations of information ethics. In The handbook of information and computer ethics, ed. K. Himma and H. Tavani, 3–23. Hoboken: Wiley.
Floridi, L. 2008b. The method of levels of abstraction. Minds and Machines 18: 303–329. doi:10.0007/s11023-008-9113-7.
Floridi, L. 2010. Ethics after the information revolution. In The Cambridge handbook of information and computer ethics, ed. L. Floridi, 3–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Floridi, L., and J.W. Sanders. 2001. Artificial evil and the foundation of computer ethics. Ethics and Information Technology 3: 55–66.
Floridi, L., and J.W. Sanders. 2004. On the morality of artificial agents. Minds and Machines 14(3): 349–379.
Fogarty, K. 2009. Cloud computing definitions and solutions. http://www.cio.com/article/501814/Cloud_Computing_Definitions_and_Solutions?page=1&taxonomyId=3024. Accessed June, 2010.
Friedman, B. 1996. Value-sensitive design. Interactions 3(6): 16–23.
Friedman, B., and H. Nissenbaum. 1996. Bias in computer systems. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems 14(3): 335.
Grodzinsky, F.S., K.W. Miller, and M.J. Wolf. 2008. The ethics of designing artificial agents. Journal of Ethics and Information Technology 10(2–3): 115–121. doi:10.1007/s10676-008-9163-9.
Grodzinsky, F.S., K.W. Miller, and M.J. Wolf. 2009. Why turing shouldn’t have to guess. Asia-Pacific Computing and Philosophy Conference, Tokyo, October 1–2, 2009.
Grover, L. 1997. Quantum mechanics helps in searching for a needle in a haystack. Phys Rev Let 79(2): 325–328.
Huff, Chuck. 1996. About social impact statements. http://www.stolaf.edu/people/huff/prose/SIS.html. Accessed September, 2010.
Jin, X., J. Ren, B. Yang, Z. Yi, F. Zhou, X. Xu, S. Wang, D. Yang, Y. Hu, S. Jiang, T. Yang, H. Yin, K. Chen, C. Peng, and J. Pan. 2010. Experimental free-space quantum teleportation. Nature Photonics 4: 376–381. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2010.87.
Johnson, D., and K. Miller. 2009. Computer ethics: Analyzing information technology, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.
Lyderson, L., C. Wiechers, C. Wittmann, D. Elser, J. Skaar, and V. Makarov. 2010. Hacking commercial quantum cryptography systems by tailored bright illumination. Nature Photonics 4: 686–689. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2010.214.
Parnas, D.L. 2009. Document based rational software development. Know-Based Syst 22(3): 132–141.
Roos, C.F., M. Riebe, H. Häffner, W. Hänsel, J. Benhelm, G. Lancaster, C. Becher, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and R. Blatt. 2004. Control and measurement of three-qubit entangled states. Science 304(5676): 1478–1480. doi:10.1126/science.1097522.
Shor, P. 1994. Algorithms for quantum computation: Discrete logarithms and factoring. In Proceedings of the 35th annual symposium on foundations of computer science, ed. S. Goldwasser, 124–134. Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society Press.
University of Connecticut (UCONN). 2010. http://www.engr.uconn.edu/votercentertechnology.php. Accessed October 25, 2010.
van den Jeroen, Hoven. 2008. Moral methodology and information technology. In The handbook of information and computer ethics, ed. K. Himma and H. Tavani, 49–67. Hoboken: Wiley.
Weinfurter, H. 2005. Quantum information. In Entangled world: The fascination of quantum information and computation, ed. J. Audretsch, 143–168. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
Werner, R.F. 2005. Quantum computers – The new generation of supercomputers? In Entangled world: The fascination of quantum information and computation, ed. J. Audretsch, 169–201. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
Wolf, M.J., K. Miller, and F.S. Grodzinsky. 2009. On the meaning of free software. Ethics and Information Technology 11(4): 279–286. doi:10.1007/s10676-009-9207-9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wolf, M.J., Grodzinsky, F.S., Miller, K.W. (2012). Artificial Agents, Cloud Computing, and Quantum Computing: Applying Floridi’s Method of Levels of Abstraction. In: Demir, H. (eds) Luciano Floridi’s Philosophy of Technology. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4292-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4292-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4291-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4292-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)