Skip to main content

Telecommuting and Flexible Work Hours: Alternative Work Arrangements that Can Improve the Quality of Work Life

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Work and Quality of Life

Abstract

In this chapter, we examine work  →  nonwork conflict, its causes, and its consequences. We also address in detail two alternative work arrangements (i.e., telecommuting and flextime) that can reduce the incidence of work  →  nonwork conflict. Our coverage of telecommuting and flextime makes apparent that these arrangements are not quick fixes. Rather, there are several contingency factors (e.g., supervisor support) that need to be considered by an employer given they influence the likely success of these nontraditional work arrangements. If implemented effectively (e.g., participation is voluntary, employees have a voice in program design), telecommuting and flextime can help an employee balance the sometimes competing demands of their work and nonwork lives. Facilitating such a balance not only has tangible benefits for employers (e.g., lower turnover), it is the ethical thing for employers to do.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anonymous. (2010). Flexible hours in the ranks. HR Magazine. SHRM 2010 HR Trend Book, 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aratani, L. (2008, August 23). Flextime has green appeal and lures younger workers. Washington Post, p. A1

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, J. T. (2006). Making the leap. HR Magazine, 51(May), 80–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 383–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, B. B., Briggs, T. E., Huff, J. W., Wright, J. A., & Neuman, G. A. (1999). Flexible and compressed workweek schedules: A meta-analysis of their effects on work-related criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 496–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breaugh, J. A., & Frye, N. K. (2008). Work-family conflict: The importance of family friendly employment practices and family supportive supervisors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22, 345–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byron, K. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work-family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 169–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Williams, L. J. (2000). Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 249–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chubb Corporation. (2005, July 18). Chubb workplace flexibility initiative boosts employee productivity. www.chubb.com/corporate/chubb3897.html

  • Dalton, D. R., & Mesch, D. (1990). The impact of flexible scheduling on employee attendance and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 370–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eby, L. T., Casper, W. J., Lockwood, A., Bordeaux, C., & Brinley, A. (2005). Work and family research in IO/OB: Content analysis and review of the literature (1998–2002). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 124–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Families and Work Institute. (2009). Guide to bold new ideas for making work work. New York: Families and Work Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, G. G., Bulger, C. A., & Smith, C. S. (2009). Beyond work and family: A measure of work/nonwork interference and facilitation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14, 441–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M. T., Heinen, B. A., & Langkamer, K. L. (2007). Work and family satisfaction and conflict: A meta-analysis of cross-domain relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 57–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frase-Blunt, M. (2007). Call centers come home. HR Magazine, 52(January), 84–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1524–1541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gannett. (2005, July 18). Gannett announces results of a pilot program for the BOLD initiative. www.gannett.com/news/pressrelease/2005/pr071805.htm

  • Golden, L. (2009). Flexible daily work schedules in U.S. jobs: Formal introductions needed? Industrial Relations, 48, 27–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golden, T. D. (2007). Co-workers who telework and the impact of those in the office: Understanding the implications of virtual work for coworkers’ satisfaction and turnover intentions. Human Relations, 60, 1641–1667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhaus, J. H., Allen, T. D., & Spector, P. E. (2006). Health consequences of work-family conflict: The dark side of the work-family interface. In P. L. Perrewe & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Research in occupational stress and well-being (Vol. 6, pp. 171–211). Amsterdam: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 76–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grzywacz, J. G., & Butler, A. B. (2008). Work-family conflict. In J. Barling & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), The handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 451–468). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilbrecht, M., Shaw, S. M., Johnson, L. C., & Andrey, J. (2008). ‘I’m home for the kids’: Contradictory implications for work-life balance of teleworking mothers. Gender, Work and Organization, 15, 454–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, E. J., Ferris, M., & Martinson, V. (2003). Does it matter where you work? A comparison of how three work venues (traditional office, virtual office, and home office) influence aspects of work and personal/family life. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 220–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jossi, F. (2007). Clocking out. HR Magazine, 52, 47–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, E. L., Kossek, E. E., Hammer, L. B., Durham, M., Bray, J., Chermack, K., et al. (2008). Getting there from here: Research on the effects of work-family initiatives on work-family conflict and business outcomes. The Academy of Management Annals, 2, 305–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, E. L., & Moen, P. (2007). Rethinking the clockwork of work: Why schedule control may pay off at work and home. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11, 487–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kossek, E. E., Lautsch, B. A., & Eaton, S. C. (2006). Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work-family effectiveness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 347–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kossek, E. E., Lewis, S., & Hammer, L. B. (2010). Work-life initiatives and organizational change: Overcoming mixed messages to move from margin to mainstream. Human Relations, 63, 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kossek, E. E., & Michel, J. S. (2011). Flexible work schedules. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 535–572). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lautsch, B. A., Kossek, E. E., & Eaton, S. C. (2009). Supervisory approaches and paradoxes in managing telecommuting implementation. Human Relations, 62, 795–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, S. (2003). Flexible working arrangements: Implementation, outcomes, and management. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Roberson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 1–28). Chichester, UK/Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J., Liu, O., Spector, P. E., & Shi, K. (2009). Antecedents and outcomes of a fourfold taxonomy of work-family balance in Chinese employed parents. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14, 182–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Major, D. A., Virive, J. M., & Joice, W. (2008). Telework as a dependent care solution: Examining current practice to improve telework management strategies. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 11, 65–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nord, W. R., Fox, S., Phoenix, A., & Viano, K. (2002). Real-world reactions to work-life balance programs: Lessons for effective implementation. Organizational Dynamics, 30, 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J. A. (2008). Successful corporate telecommuting with technology considerations for late adopters. Organizational Dynamics, 38, 16–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podlas, K. (2001). Reasonable accommodation or special privilege? Flex-time, telecommuting, and the ADA. Business Horizons, 44, 61–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy, A. (2007). The future is now. HR Magazine, 52, 46–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogier, S. A., & Padgett, M. Y. (2004). The impact of utilizing a flexible work schedule on the perceived career advancement potential of women. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15, 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, A. M., & Kossek, E. E. (2008). Work-life policy implementation: Breaking down or creating barriers to inclusion. Human Resource Management, 47, 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Society for Human Resource Management. (2009, July). Workplace flexibility in the 21st century. Alexandria, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tahmincioglu, E. (2003, July 20). By telecommuting, the disabled get a key to the office, and a job. New York Times, p. 1 (L).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. L., Delcampo, R. G., & Blancero, D. M. (2009). Work-family conflict/facilitation and the role of workplace supports for U.S. Hispanic professionals. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 643–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. F., & Aspinwall, K. R. (2009). The recruitment value of work/life benefits. Personnel Review, 38, 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States General Accounting Office. (July, 2001). Potential barriers employers may face when establishing telecommuting programs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, J. L., & Gordon, D. (1980). Assessing the impact of flextime on productivity. Business Horizons, 23, 61–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, S. J. (2001). Making telecommuting work. HR Magazine, 46(October), 34–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, S. J. (2007). Are you too family friendly. HR Magazine, 52(October), 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • WorldatWork. (2009, February). WorldatWork 2009 telework trendlines.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James A. Breaugh Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Breaugh, J.A., Farabee, A.M. (2012). Telecommuting and Flexible Work Hours: Alternative Work Arrangements that Can Improve the Quality of Work Life. In: Reilly, N., Sirgy, M., Gorman, C. (eds) Work and Quality of Life. International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4059-4_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics