Skip to main content

Philanthropic Venture Capitalists’ Post-Investment Involvement with Portfolio Social Enterprises: What Do They Actually Do?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Entrepreneurship, Finance, Governance and Ethics

Part of the book series: Advances in Business Ethics Research ((ABER,volume 3))

Abstract

This chapter presents results from an empirical study concerning post-investment value-added services provided by philanthropic venture capitalists to their backed social enterprises. Results show that the most important activity consists in the provision of strategic advice for organizational development. Philanthropic venture capitalists act as advisors and mentors of social entrepreneurs. Also, findings show how important is facilitating access to future potential funders on the side of the social enterprise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arthurs, J.D., and L.W. Busenitz. 2003. The boundaries and limitations of agency theory and stewardship theory in the venture capitalist/entrepreneur relationship. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 28(2): 145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J., H. Stevenson, and J. Wei-Skillern. 2006. Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 30(1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B., J.O. Fiet, L.W. Busenitz, and D.D. Moesel. 1996. The Substitution of bonding for monitoring in venture capitalist relations with high technology enterprises. Journal of High Technology Management Research 7(1): 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bello, Z. 2005. Socially responsible investing and portfolio diversification. Journal of Financial Research 28(1): 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brander, J., R. Amit, and W. Antweiler. 2002. Venture-capital syndication: Improved venture selection vs. the value-added hypothesis. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 11(3): 422–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bygrave, W.D. 1987. Syndicated investments by venture capital firms: A networking perspective. Journal of Business Venturing 2(2): 139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cable, D.M., and S. Shane. 1997. A Prisoner’s dilemma approach to entrepreneur-venture capitalist relationships. Academy of Management Review 22(1): 142–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • CAN. 2011. www.can-online.org.uk. Accessed 17 Sept 2011.

  • Certo, S.T., and T. Miller. 2008. Social entrepreneurship: Key issues and concepts. Business Horizons 51(4): 267–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chell, E., K. Nicolopoulou, and M. KarataĹź-Ă–zkan. 2010. Social entrepreneurship and enterprise: International and innovation perspectives. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 22(6): 485–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dacin, P.A., M.T. Dacin, and M. Matear. 2010. Social entrepreneurship: Why we don’t need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives 24(3): 37–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dees, J.G. 1998. Enterprising nonprofits. Harvard Business Review 76(1): 54–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Domenico, M., H. Haugh, and P. Tracey. 2010. Social bricolage: Theorizing social value creation in social enterprises. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 34(4): 681–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K.M. 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review 14(1): 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, M., and W.A. Sahlman. 1989. What do venture capitalists do? Journal of Business Venturing 4(4): 231–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gompers, P. 1995. Optimal Investment, Monitoring, and the Staging of Venture Capital. Journal of Finance 50(5): 1461–1489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellmann, T., and M. Puri. 2002. Venture capital and the professionalization of start-up firms: Empirical evidence. Journal of Finance 57(1): 169–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M., and W. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3(4): 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, R. 2006. Venture philanthropy: The evolution of high engagement philanthropy in Europe. Oxford: SaĂŻd Business School Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, R. 2007. Beyond the cheque: how venture philanthropists add value. Skoll Center Working Paper. Oxford: Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S.N., and P. Strömberg. 2001. Venture capitalists as principals: Contracting, screening, and monitoring. American Economic Review 91(2): 426–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kistruck, G.M., and P.W. Beamish. 2010. The interplay of form, structure, and embeddedness in social intrapreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 34(4): 735–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. 1994. The syndication of venture capital investments. FM: The Journal of the Financial Management Association 23(3): 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letts, C., W. Ryan, and A. Grossman. 1997. Virtuous capital: What foundations can learn from venture capitalists. Harvard Business Review 75(2): 36–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, I., D. Kulow, and R. Khoylian. 1989. Venture capitalists’ involvement in their investments: Extent and performance. Journal of Business Venturing 4(1): 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, J., and I. MartĂ­. 2006. Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business 41(1): 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, J., and O. Schoen. 2005. Social entrepreneurial business models: An exploratory study. IESE business school working paper no. 610. Barcelona: IESE Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyskens, M., C. Robb-Post, J.A. Stamp, A.L. Carsrud, and P.D. Reynolds. 2010. Social ventures from a resource-based perspective: An exploratory study assessing global Ashoka fellows. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 34(4): 661–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, G.A. 2006. The financial performance of a socially responsible investment over time and a possible link with corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 63(2): 131–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T.L., and C.L. Wesley II. 2010. Assessing mission and resources for social change: An organizational identity perspective on social venture capitalists’ decision criteria. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 34(4): 705–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, T.W., J.C. Short, G.T. Payne, and G.T. Lumpkin. 2011. Dual identities in social ventures: An exploratory study. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 35(4): 805–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. 2010a. The institutionalization of social investment: The interplay of investment logics and investor rationalities. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 1(1): 70–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. 2010b. The legitimacy of social entrepreneurship: Reflexive isomorphism in a pre-paradigmatic field. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 34(4): 611–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peredo, A.M., and M. McLean. 2006. Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business 41(1): 56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reis, T. 1999. Unleashing the new resources and entrepreneurship for the common good: A scan, synthesis and scenario for action. Battle Creek: W.K. Kellogg Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstein, J., A. Bruno, W.D. Bygrave, and N.T. Taylor. 1993. The CEO, venture capitalists, and the board. Journal of Business Venturing 8(2): 99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapienza, H., and J.A. Timmons. 1989. The roles of venture capitalists in new ventures: What determines their importance? Best Paper Proceedings, Academy of Management 74–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapienza, H., and M.A. Korsgaard. 1996. Procedural justice in entrepreneur-investor relations. Academy of Management Journal 39(3): 544–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapienza, H., M.A. Korsgaard, P.K. Goulet, and J.P. Hoogendam. 2000. Effects of agency risks and procedural justice on board processes in venture capital-backed firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 12(4): 331–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarlata, M.R. 2011. Philanthropic venture capital: An exploratory comparative study. SaarbrĂĽcken: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarlata, M.R., and L. Alemany. 2010. Deal structuring in philanthropic venture capital investments: Financing instrument, valuation and covenants. Journal of Business Ethics 95(1): 121–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarlata, M.R., L. Alemany, and A. Zacharakis. 2012. Philanthropic Venture Capital: Venture Capital for Social Entrepreneurs?, Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship 8(4): 279–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seelos, C., and J. Mair. 2005a. Social entrepreneurship: Creating new business models to serve the poor. Business Horizons 48(3): 241–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seelos, C., and J. Mair. 2005b. Sustainable development, sustainable profit. European Business Forum 20: 49–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S.P. 2005. Investing in socially responsible companies is a must for public pension funds – Because there is no better alternative. Journal of Business Ethics 56(2): 99–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson, O., and T.E. Stuart. 2001. Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. The American Journal of Sociology 106(6): 1546–1588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparkes, R., and C.J. Cowton. 2004. The maturing of socially responsible investment: A review of the developing link with corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 52(1): 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmons, J.A., and W.D. Bygrave. 1986. Venture capital’s role in financing innovation for economic growth. Journal of Business Venturing 1(2): 161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., and A. Lockett. 2003. The structure and management of alliances: Syndication in the venture capital industry. Journal of Management Studies 40(8): 2073–2102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S.A., E. Gedajlovic, D.O. Neubaum, and J.M. Shulman. 2009. A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing 24(5): 519–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mariarosa Scarlata .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science + Business Media Dordrecht.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scarlata, M., Alemany, L. (2013). Philanthropic Venture Capitalists’ Post-Investment Involvement with Portfolio Social Enterprises: What Do They Actually Do?. In: Cressy, R., Cumming, D., Mallin, C. (eds) Entrepreneurship, Finance, Governance and Ethics. Advances in Business Ethics Research, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3867-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics