Skip to main content

Internationalization of Population Issues

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
World Population Policies
  • 1476 Accesses

Abstract

Rather pragmatic considerations, i.e., to reduce high levels of mortality and particularly fertility, led to the first modern population programs. It could be argued that these interventions, which were implemented after World War II, were the result of a kind of de facto consensus in favor of such global endeavors. At the time, both mortality and fertility levels were deemed to be too high in developing countries. Curbing fertility levels was considered important and urgent, because it was assumed that such a reduction would improve socioeconomic outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Population Crisis Committee (PCC), created in 1965, played a key role under the leadership of the Major-General William H. Draper, Jr. (1894–1974). The PCC helped get international ­family planning programs started. It was also most influential in the creation of key population ­institutions, like UNFPA, and helped establish an Office of Population within USAID. It also raised ­private funds for the IPPF.

  2. 2.

    Later, such cash incentives would be banned by some agencies, e.g., USAID, as being coercive. Even monetary incentives for family planning providers would be prohibited, for instance under Results-Based Financing (RBF) schemes.

  3. 3.

    However, the WHO Department of Reproductive Health and Research and its longstanding Human Reproduction Program currently carry out important work in the area of contraceptive research and normative guidance for family planning and reproductive health programs.

  4. 4.

    Initially, UNFPA was set up as a division of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and managed by the UNDP Governing Council. The first name of UNFPA was United Nations Fund for Population Activities.

  5. 5.

    GTZ was renamed Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) in January 2011.

  6. 6.

    In addition, global health initiatives, health sector reforms, and new financial modalities from donors and lenders further threatened the reproductive health agenda; see Yazbeck (2004).

  7. 7.

    Ironically, soon after the Cairo conference, the Bank changed the acronym PHN, which stands for population, health and nutrition, into HNP, thereby demoting population issues.

  8. 8.

    The same authors point to the lobbying exerted in the early 1950s by the Holy See, with the ­support of some countries (e.g., Belgium, Italy, and Lebanon), to ensure that family planning would not be included in the mandate of the World Health Organization (Ibid.: 58–66).

  9. 9.

    Ronald Reagan (1911–2004) was the US 40th President (1981–1989).

  10. 10.

    In its 16 chapters, the extensive ICPD Report covered a wide range of topics, inter alia ­population growth and structure, mortality, fertility, population distribution, international migration, education, technology, research, and international cooperation. Unfortunately, public and media ­attention focused almost exclusively on Chapter VII, which dealt with reproductive rights and reproductive health, and Chapter VIII, which covered abortion (paragraph 8.25). As a result, the world lost sight from the global perspective offered by this comprehensive document.

  11. 11.

    A similar conference is planned for 2012.

  12. 12.

    European countries, which wanted to fund reproductive health, became major donors of UNFPA, which explains in part why this agency somewhat lost sight of family planning goals.

  13. 13.

    Sometimes, declarations endorsed internationally by governments are adopted with considerable delays by their national parliaments. For example, the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa, which was adopted in July 2003 by the African Union in the form of a protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, was signed by 46 countries but was ratified by only 28 countries as of July 2010. The “Maputo Protocol” guarantees comprehensive rights to women including the right to take part in the political process, to achieve social and political equality with men, to control their reproductive health, and to end female genital mutilation.

  14. 14.

    With the benefit of hindsight, one may regret that population and family planning professionals at the time did not denounce sufficiently the abuses of the programs in India and China.

  15. 15.

    The new United Nations projections (the 2010 Revision) issued in 2011 use the median trajectory of the probabilistic projection of the TFR to inform the assumptions for the medium fertility variant. However, mortality is still projected deterministically. Additionally, the projections run until 2100 instead of 2050 as in the previous UN projections revisions.

  16. 16.

    In its 2008 population projections (Medium variant), the UN Population Division assumes a global average TFR of 2.02 children per woman for the period 2045–2050; see United Nations (2009d): 10.

References

  • Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J., McDonald, P., & Hosseini-Chavoshi, M. (2009). The fertility transition in Iran: Revolution and reproduction. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Allman, J., Rohde, J., & Wray, J. (1987). Integration and disintegration: The case of family planning in Haiti. Health Policy and Planning, 2(3), 236–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayad, M., & Barrère, B. (1991). Présentation des enquêtes démographiques et de santé. Population, 46(4), 964–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, A. M. (2009). Over-demonizing the international population movement. Population Studies, 63(2), 187–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birdsall, N., Kelley, A. C., & Sinding, S. W. (Eds.). (2001). Population matters: Demographic change, economic growth, and poverty in the developing world. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bongaarts, J., & Sinding, S. W. (2009). A response to critics of family planning programs. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 35(1), 39–44 (corrected version).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. F. (2007). Tunisia: The debut of family planning. In W. C. Robinson & J. A. Ross (Eds.), The global family planning revolution: Three decades of population policies and programs (pp. 59–69). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, J. C. (2003a). History of demography. In P. Demeny & G. McNicoll (Eds.), The encyclopedia of population (Vol. 1, pp. 216–221). New York: Macmillan Reference USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, J. C. (2003b). Population organizations. Professional associations. In P. Demeny & G. McNicoll (Eds.), The encyclopedia of population (Vol. 2, pp. 742–744). New York: Macmillan Reference USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell White, A., Merrick, T. W., & Yazbeck, A. S. (2006). Reproductive health. The missing millennium development goal: Poverty, health, and development in a changing world. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chamie, J. (2003). Population organizations. United Nations system. In P. Demeny & G. McNicoll (Eds.), The encyclopedia of population (Vol. 2, pp. 749–752). New York: Macmillan Reference USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chasteland, J. C. (2002). De 1950 à 2000: La communauté internationale face au problème de la croissance de la population mondiale. In J. C. Chasteland & J. C. Chesnais (Eds.), La population du monde: Géants démographiques et défis internationaux (2nd ed., pp. 717–753). Paris: Institut national d'études démographiques.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chasteland, J. C. (2006). World population growth and the international community from 1950 to the present day. In G. Caselli, J. Vallin, & G. Wunsch (Eds.), Demography: Analysis and synthesis. A treatise in population studies (Vol. IV, pp. 457–486). San Diego: Academic Press/Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, J., & Mauldin, W. P. (1991). The promotion of family planning by financial payments: The case of Bangladesh. Studies in Family Planning, 22(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, J., & Verma, V. (1989). The world fertility survey: An appraisal of methodology. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84(407), 756–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, M. J. (2008). Fatal misconception: The struggle to control world population. Cambridge/London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossette, B. (2005). Reproductive health and the millennium development goals: The missing link. Studies in Family Planning, 36(1), 71–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, H. P., Morgall, J. M., Osler, M., Rasmussen, N. K., & Jensen, B. (1990). United States and Denmark: Different approaches to health care and family planning. Studies in Family Planning, 21(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. (2009). The World Development Report at thirty: A birthday tribute or a funeral elegy? In S. Yusuf (Ed.), Development economics through the decades: A critical look at thirty years of the world development report (pp. 105–114). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeJong, J. (2000). The role and limitations of the Cairo international conference on population and development. Social Science and Medicine, 51(6), 941–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon-Mueller, R. (1993). Population policy & women’s rights: Transforming reproductive choice. Westport/London: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eager, P. W. (2004). Global population policy: From population control to reproductive rights. Hants/Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • England, P. (2003). Feminist perspectives on population issues. In P. Demeny & G. McNicoll (Eds.), The encyclopedia of population (pp. 399–403). New York: Macmillan Reference USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkle, J. L., & Crane, B. B. (1975). The politics of Bucharest: Population, development and the new international economic order. Population and Development Review, 1(1), 87–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkle, J. L., & Crane, B. B. (1985). Ideology and politics at Mexico city: The United States at the 1984 international conference on population. Population and Development Review, 11(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkle, J. L., & Crane, B. B. (1990). The politics of international population policy. In International transmission of population policy experience. Proceedings of the expert group meeting on the International Transmission of Population Policy Experience, New York, June 27–30, 1988 (pp. 167–182). New York: United Nations, Department of International Economic and Social Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkle, J. L., & McIntosh, C. A. (2002). United Nations population conferences: Shaping the policy agenda for the twenty-first century. Studies in Family Planning, 33(1), 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francome, C., & Vekemans, M. (2007). Abortion: A worldwide perspective. London: Middlesex University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrow, D. J. (1994). Liberty and sexuality: The right to privacy and the making of Roe v. Wade. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, D., Maguire, E. S., Neuse, M., Sinding, S. W., & Speidel, J. J. (2009). International family-planning budgets in the “new US” era. The Lancet, 373(9674), 1505–1507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Health Council. (2004). Banking on reproductive health: The World Bank’s support for population, the Cairo agenda and the millennium development goals. Washington, DC: Global Health Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guengant, J. P. (2002). ’Revolution” in the field of population projections. CICRED Newsletter, 6(December), 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haaga, J. (2003). Population organizations. Research institutions. In P. Demeny & G. McNicoll (Eds.), The encyclopedia of population (Vol. 2, pp. 744–748). New York: Macmillan Reference USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, B. (1995). Reproductive rights and wrongs: The global politics of population control and contraceptive choice (Revth ed.). Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslegrave, M., & Bernstein, S. (2005). ICPD goals: Essential to the millennium development goals. Reproductive Health Matters, 13(25), 106–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, D. (2009). Abortion, family planning, and population policy: Prospects for the common-ground approach. Population and Development Review, 35(3), 479–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, D., & Watkins, S. C. (1997). Feminists and neo-Malthusians: Past and present alliances. Population and Development Review, 23(3), 469–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, L., & Hardee, K. (2010). How do recent population trends matter to climate change? Population Research and Policy Review. August 24 online. doi: 10.1007/511113-010-9189-7.

  • Lutz, W. (Ed.). (2011). Toward a new set of science-based world population projections by age, sex, and level of educational attainment for individual countries (including the Provinces of India and China). PopNet (IIASA Population Network Newsletter) 42, 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, W., & Samir, K. C. (2011). Global human capital: Integrating education and population. Science, 333(6042), 587–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, A. L. (2003). Population organizations. National and international agencies. In P. Demeny & G. McNicoll (Eds.), The encyclopedia of population (pp. 739–742). New York: Macmillan Reference USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, J. F. (2005). Population policy. In D. L. Poston & M. Micklin (Eds.), Handbook of population (pp. 827–852). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publisher Springer Science & Business Media, Inc.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • May, J. F., Van De Perre, P., Sokal, D., Carael, M., Fox, E., Habiyakare, T., & Bucyendore, A. (1991). AIDS prevention and family planning. The Lancet, 338(8758), 63–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, C. A., & Finkle, J. L. (1995). The Cairo conference on population and development: A new paradigm? Population and Development Review, 21(2), 223–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, C. A., & Finkle, J. L. (2003). International population conferences. In P. Demeny & G. McNicoll (Eds.), The encyclopedia of population (Vol. 1, pp. 168–170). New York: Macmillan Reference USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Measham, A. R., & Lopez-Escobar, G. (2007). Against the odds: Colombia’s role in the family planning revolution. In W. C. Robinson & J. A. Ross (Eds.), The global family planning revolution: Three decades of population policies and programs (pp. 121–135). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences. (1971). Rapid population growth: Consequences and policy implications. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press for the National Academy of Sciences. 2 vol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndulu, B. J., Chakraborti, L., Lijane, L., Ramachandran, V., & Wolgin, J. (2007). Challenges of African growth. Opportunities, constraints, and strategic directions. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Notestein, F. W. (1954). World population conference Rome, August 31–September 10. Population Index, 20(4), 241–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, B. C., & Lutz, W. (2003). Projections and forecast, population. In P. Demeny & G. McNicoll (Eds.), The encyclopedia of population (Vol. 2, pp. 808–813). New York: Macmillan Reference USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, B. C., Dalton, M., Fuchs, R., Jiang, L., Pachauri, S., & Zigova, K. (2010). Global demographic trends and future carbon emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 17521–17526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ott, E. R. (1977). Population policy formation in Colombia: The role of ASCOFAME. Studies in Family Planning, 8(1), 2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Population Foundation of India & Population Reference Bureau. (2007). The future population of India: A long-range demographic view. New Delhi: Population Foundation of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Population Reference Bureau. (2010a). 2010 world population data sheet. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, W. C., & El-Zanaty, F. H. (2007). The evolution of population policies and programs in the Arab republic of Egypt. In W. C. Robinson & J. A. Ross (Eds.), The global family panning revolution: Three decades of population policies and programs (pp. 15–31). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. D. (2008). Common wealth: Economics for a crowded planet. New York: The Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. S. (2009). Creating a new consensus on population: The politics of reproductive health, reproductive rights and women’s empowerment (2nd ed.). London/Sterling: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S., Wulf, D., Hussain, R., Bankole, A., & Sedgh, G. (2009a). Abortion worldwide: A decade of uneven progress. New York: Guttmacher Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speidel, J. J., Sinding, S., Gillespie, D., Maguire, E., & Neuse, M. (2009a). Making the case for U.S. international family planning assistance. Washington, DC: United States Agency for International Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamper, B. M. (1977). Population and planning in developing nations. A review of sixty development plans for the 1970s. New York: The Population Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symonds, R., & Carder, M. (1973). The united nations and the population question, 1945–1970. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabutin, D. (2006). Information systems in demography. In G. Caselli, J. Vallin, & G. Wunsch (Eds.), Demography: Analysis and synthesis. A treatise in population studies (Vol. IV, pp. 493–522). San Diego: Academic Press/Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (2003). Human development report 2003: Millennium development goals: A compact among nations to end human poverty. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFPA. (2009a). Annual report 2008. New York: United Nations Population Fund. See http://www.unfpa.org/webdav/site/global/shared/documents/publications/2009/annual_report_2008.pdf. Accessed on November 28, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1975). Report of the United Nations world population conference, Bucharest, 19–30 August 1974. New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1984). Report on the international conference on population, Mexico, August 6–14, 1984. New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1990a). International transmission of population policy experience. In Proceedings of the expert group meeting on the international transmission of population policy experience, New York, June 27–30, 1988. New York: United Nations, Department of International Economic and Social Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1995b). Report on the international conference on population and development, Cairo, September 5–13, 1994. New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2007a). Report of the secretary-general on the work of the organization. Sixty-second session, supplement 1. New York: United Nations, General Assembly, Official Records.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2009d). World population prospects: The 2008 revision. Comprehensive tables (Vol. 1). New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2010c). World population policies 2009. New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States. (1984). Policy statement of the United States of America at the international conference on population. Population and Development Review, 10(3), 574–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, D. P. (1982). Bitter pills: Population policies and their implementation in eight developing countries. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside, A. (2008). HIV/AIDS. A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1984). World development report 1984. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1991). Population, health, and nutrition. Fiscal 1990 sector review (Policy, Research, and External Affairs Working Paper 707). Washington, DC: The World Bank, Population and Human Resources Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1994b). Population and development: Implications for the world bank. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2000b). Population and the world bank: Adapting to change (Revth ed.). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yazbeck, A. S. (2004). Real and perceived threats to reproductive health: A way forward. Reproductive Health Matters, 12(24), 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

May, J.F. (2012). Internationalization of Population Issues. In: World Population Policies. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2837-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics