Skip to main content

Inside and Outside the Game

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Computer Games and New Media Cultures
  • 5602 Accesses

Abstract

Immersion is a frequently used term. In this chapter, I mark its limits and its potential. In doing so, I will show the bidirectionality of immersion. This builds upon the concept of border. It is used in two significant ways: on the one hand, it shows the connection between player and game, and on the other hand, it represents their separation. Therein lies the concept of double bind. This is represented by an including exclusion. This is supported by recalling the player as a conscious being with intentions. In addition, the active player implies a context of communication. Communication is established as a more powerful superset of interaction. Applying principles of communication naturally leads to the social context. Finally, the myth of total immersion in games is revealed as a contradiction in itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Bibliography

  • Bolten, J. (1985). Die hermeneutische Spirale. Ãœberlegungen zu einer integrativen Literaturtheorie. Poetica, 17, 355–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuer, J. (2009). Mittendrin – statt nur dabei. In M. Mosel (Ed.), Gefangen im Flow? Ästhetik und dispositive Strukturen von Computerspielen (pp. 181–213). Boizenburg: Verlag Werner Hülsbusch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. (2003). Play dead. Genre and affect in Silent Hill and Planescape Torment. Game Studies, 3(1). http://www.gamestudies.org/0301/carr/. Accessed 29 Oct 2009.

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1977). Beyond boredom and anxiety. The experience of play in work and games. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ermi, L., & Mäyrä, F. (2005). Fundamental components of the gameplay experience: Analysing immersion. In Proceedings of DiGRA 2005 Conference: Changing Views – Worlds in Play, Vancouver. http://www.digra.org/dl/db/06276.41516.pdf/. Accessed 6 May 2010.

  • Ferreira, E., & Falcão, T. (2009). Through the looking glass: Weavings between the magic circle and immersive processes in video games. In Breaking new Ground: Innovation in Games, Play, Practice and Theory. Proceedings of DiGRA 2009. http://www.digra.org/dl/db/09287.45173.pdf. Accessed 7 May 2010.

  • Fritz, J., & Misek-Schneider, K. (1995). StudentInnen im Sog der Computerspiele. In J. Fritz (Ed.), Warum Computerspiele faszinieren. Empirische Annäherungen an Nutzung und Wirkung von Bildschirmspielen (pp. 39–65). Weinheim: Juventa-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Günzel, S. (2008). The space-image. Interactivity and spatiality of computer games. In S. Günzel, M. Liebe, & D. Mersch (Eds.), Conference Proceedings of the Philosophy of Computer Games Conference (pp. 170–188). http://opus.kobv.de/ubp/volltexte/2008/2007/. Accessed 29 Oct 2009.

  • Huizinga, J. (2006). Homo ludens. Vom Ursprung der Kultur im Spiel. Hamburg: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juul, J. (2005). Half-real: Video games between real rules and fictional worlds. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimmt, C. (2006). Computerspielen als Handlung. Dimensionen und Determinanten des Erlebens interaktiver Unterhaltungsangebote. Köln: von Halem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1993). Paradoxie der Form. In D. Baecker (Ed.), Probleme der Form. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (2002). Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nacke, L., & Lindley, C. A. (2008). Flow and immersion in first-person shooters: Measuring the player’s gameplay experience. In Future Play’08: Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Future Play (pp. 81–88). Toronto: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neitzel, B., & Nohr, R. F. (2006). Das Spiel mit dem Medium. Partizipation – Immersion – Partizipation. Zur Teilhabe an den Medien von Kunst bis Computerspiel. In B. Neitzel & R. F. Nohr (Eds.), Das Spiel mit dem Medium. Partizipation – Immersion – Partizipation. Zur Teilhabe an den Medien von Kunst bis Computerspiel (pp. 9–17). Marburg: Schüren Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2006). Don’t bother me mom – I’m learning! St. Paul: Paragon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, D. W. (2006). How computer games help children learn. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P. (1971). Menschliche Kommunikation. Formen, Störungen, Paradoxien. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

Filmography

  • Strange Days. (1995). K. Bigelow (Dir.), USA: Lightstorm Entertainment.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominik Härig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Härig, D. (2012). Inside and Outside the Game. In: Fromme, J., Unger, A. (eds) Computer Games and New Media Cultures. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2777-9_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics