Abstract
During the last decade particle beam cancer therapy has seen a rapid increase in interest, and several new centers have been built, are currently under construction, or are in an advanced stage of planning. Typical treatment centers today consist of an accelerator capable of producing proton or ion beams in an energy range of interest for medical treatment, i.e. providing a penetration depth in water of about 30 cm, a beam delivery system to transport the produced beam to the patient treatment rooms, and several patient stations, allowing for an optimal usage of the continuously produced beam. This makes these centers rather large and consequently expensive. Only major hospital centers situated in an area where they can draw on a population of several million can afford such an installation. In order to spread the use of particle beam cancer therapy to a broader population base it will be necessary to scale down the facility size and cost. This can in principle be done by reducing the number of treatment rooms to one, eliminating the need of an elaborate beam delivery system, and thereby reducing the building size and cost. Such a change should be going in parallel with a reduction of the accelerator itself, and a number of approaches to this are currently being pursued. If successful, such developments could eventually lead to a compact system where all components would fit into a single shielded room, not much different in size from a typical radiation vault for radiotherapy with X-rays.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
U. Mock et al., Radioth. Oncol. 73 Sup. 2 S29-S34 (2004); B. Glimelius et al., Acta Oncologica 44 836- 849 (2005)
J.B. Flanz, Nucl. Inst. Meth. B 261 768-772 (2007)
T. Ohkawa, Phys. Soc. Japan Symp. Nucl. Phys. Tokyo, (1953)
K. Symon, D. Kerst, L. Jones L. Laslett, Terwiliger K., Phys. Rev. 103 1837 (1956)
A. A. Kolomensky, Sov. Phys. JETP 6 231 (1957)
R. Edgecok et al., Proc. of EPAC 2008, Genoa, Italy (2009)
K. Peach, et al., Proc of PAC 2009, Vancouver, BC, Canada
S. Sheehy, Proceedings pf PAC 2009, Vancouver, BC, Canada
U. Amaldi, et al., Nucl. Inst. Meth. A 521 512-529 (2004)
U. Amaldi, et al., Nucl. Inst. Meth. A 620 563-577 (2010)
U. Amaldi, S. Braccini, G. Magrin, P. Pearce, R. Zennaro, Ion acceleration system for medical and/or other applications, Patent WO 2008/081480 A1
U. Oelfke, T. Bortfeld, Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2-5 401 (2003)
O. Heid, T. Hughes, Proceedings of HB2010, Morschach, Switzerland (2010)
G.J. Caporaso, et al. Proceedings PAC 09, Vancouver, BC, Canada (2009)
A. Pavloski, et al., Sov. At. En. 28 549 (1970)
S.E. Sampayan, et al., IEEE Trans. Diel. and Elec. Ins. 7 (3) pg. 334 (2000)
J. Harris, et. al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 241502 (2008)
J. Sullivan, J. Stanley, IEEE International Power Modulator Symposium (27th) and High-Voltage Workshop, Washington, DC, May 14-18, p. 215 (2006)
J. Leopold, et. al., IEEE Trans. Diel. And Elec. Ins. 12 (3) 530 (2005)
T. Tajima, J.M. Dawson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 267 (1979)
P. Chen, J.M. Dawson, R.W. Huff, T. Katsouleas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 693-696 (1985)
J. Faure, et al., Nature 431 541-544 (2004)
S. Mangles, et al., Nature 431 535-538 (2004)
C. Geddes, et al., Nature 431 538-541 (2004)
M.J. Martin, Natl. Cancer Institute 101 450-451 (2009)
G. Kraft, S. Kraft, New J. Phys. 11 025001
P.R. Bolton, et al., Nucl. Inst. Methods A620 1392-1400 (2010)
R.A. Snavely, et al., Phys. rev. Lett. 85 2945-2948 (2000)
M. Hegelich, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 085002-1-4 (2002)
S. Hatchett, et al., Phys. Plasmas 5 2076-2082 (2000)
M. Hegelich, et al., Phys. Plasmas 12 056314 (2005)
H. Schwoerer, et al., Nature 439 445-448 (2006)
T. Esirkepov, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 175003 (2002)
B.M. Hegelich, et al., Nature 439 441-444 ((2006)
K. Zeil, et al., NJP 12 045015 (2010)
J. Hein, et al., Conference Proceedings LEI 2009, ed. Dan Dumitras, AIP Conf. Proc. 1228 159-174
C.-M. Ma, et al., Laser Physics 16 639-646 (2006)
W. Luo, E. Fourkal, J. Li, C.-M. Ma, Med. Phys. 32 794806 (2005)
S. Schell, J.J. Wilkens, Phys. Med. Biol. 54 N459-N466 (2009)
S.D. Kraft, et al., 12 085003 (2010)
C. Richter, et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 56 1529-1543 (2011)
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by the DFG under contract WE3565-3 and the NSF under grant # CBET 0853157. MHH acknowledges support by the EU through a Marie Curie Fellowship under contract # PIIF-GA-2009-234814.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Holzscheiter, M.H., Bassler, N. (2012). Future Particle Accelerator Developments for Radiation Therapy. In: GarcÃa Gómez-Tejedor, G., Fuss, M. (eds) Radiation Damage in Biomolecular Systems. Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2564-5_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2564-5_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2563-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2564-5
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)