Abstract
In this paper Leibniz’s influence on the early eighteenth century French philosophy of nature will be discussed. The paper focuses on two texts, the “Lettre sur la comète” of Pierre Louis Moreau de Maupertuis and the “Institutions de physique” of Emilie du Châtelet as representative for the interest of French scholars in Leibniz at that time. As it can be seen from the two publications, Leibnitian ideas governed scientific as well as metaphysical discourses. When Maupertuis was primarily inspired by the Leibnitian possible world problem, which he transformed into a kind of scientific methodology, Du Châtelet examined the principles of contradiction and sufficient reason as fundamental for a systematic reconstruction of a metaphysical base of science. It will be demonstrated that the different approaches to draw a line from Leibniz to early eighteenth century problems paved the way for unique and distinctive metaphysical solutions in Du Châtelet and Maupertuis as well. These solutions have to be understood as first steps to redefine the relationship between metaphysics and science under the condition of Newtonian physics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Maupertuis. 1768b. Lettre. 256.
- 2.
Maupertuis. 1768b. Lettre. 207.
- 3.
Maupertuis. 1768b. Lettre. 211 f.
- 4.
Maupertuis. 1768b. Lettre. 213.
- 5.
Maupertuis. 1768b. Lettre. 224.
- 6.
Maupertuis. 1768b. Lettre. 238.
- 7.
Leibniz. 1998. Monadologie. 60, 62.
- 8.
Leibniz. 1949. Protogaea. 24 ff.
- 9.
Maupertuis. 1768b. Lettre. 241.
- 10.
Inst1742Rep1988 §392.
- 11.
Inst1742Rep1988 §393.
- 12.
Maupertuis. 1768a. Essay de Cosmologie. 42.
- 13.
Inst1742Rep1988 XII.
- 14.
Inst1742Rep1988 XII.
- 15.
Leibniz. 1999. Discours de métaphysique. 1538. The passage reads: “Et si quelcun traçoit tout d’une suite une ligne qui seroit tantost droite, tantost cercle, tantost d’une autre nature, il est possible de trouver une notion ou regle ou equation commune à tous les points de cette ligne, en vertu de la quelle ces mêmes changemens doivent arriver.“
- 16.
See also: Inst1742Rep1988 §13.
- 17.
See also Hecht. 2006. Maupertuis und die Leibniz-Tradition an der Berliner Akademie.
- 18.
Leibniz. 1890. Tentamen Anagogicum. 275.
- 19.
Inst1742Rep1988 §401.
- 20.
Inst1742Rep1988 §403.
- 21.
Inst1742Rep1988 §403.
- 22.
Inst1742Rep1988 §422.
- 23.
Inst1742Rep1988 §427 f.
- 24.
Inst1742Rep1988 §437.
- 25.
Inst1742Rep1988 §437.
- 26.
Maupertuis. 1768a. Essay de Cosmologie. 42.
- 27.
Inst1742Rep1988 §437.
- 28.
Inst1742Rep1988 §437.
- 29.
Inst1742Rep1988 §389.
- 30.
Inst1742Rep1988 §394.
- 31.
Inst1742Rep1988 §340.
- 32.
Inst1742Rep1988 §378.
References
Hecht, H. 2006. Maupertuis und die Leibniz-Tradition an der Berliner Akademie. In Hofkultur und aufgeklärte Öffentlichkeit: Potsdam im 18. Jahrhundert im europäischen Kontext, ed. Günther Lottes and Iwan D’Aprile. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Leibniz, G. W. 1999. Discours de métaphysique. In Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, ed. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, series VI, vol 4, Part B. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Leibniz, G. W. 1890. Tentamen Anagogicum. In Die philosophischen Schriften, ed. Carl Immanuel Gerhardt, vol 7. Berlin: Weidmann.
Leibniz, G. W. 1998. Monadologie, ed. Hartmut Hecht. Stuttgart: Reclam.
Leibniz, G. W. 1949. Protogaea. Transl. by W. v. Engelhardt. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Maupertuis, P. L. M. de. 1768a. Essay de Cosmologie. In OEuvres et lettres, vol 1. Lyon: Bruyset.
Maupertuis, P. L. M. de. 1768b. Lettre sur la comète qui paroissoit en 1742. In OEuvres et lettres, vol 3. Lyon: Bruyset.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hecht, H. (2012). In the Spirit of Leibniz – Two Approaches from 1742. In: Hagengruber, R. (eds) Emilie du Châtelet between Leibniz and Newton. International Archives of the History of Ideas / Archives internationales d'histoire des idées, vol 205. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2093-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2093-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2074-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2093-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)