Skip to main content

In the Spirit of Leibniz – Two Approaches from 1742

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Emilie du Châtelet between Leibniz and Newton

Abstract

In this paper Leibniz’s influence on the early eighteenth century French philosophy of nature will be discussed. The paper focuses on two texts, the “Lettre sur la comète” of Pierre Louis Moreau de Maupertuis and the “Institutions de physique” of Emilie du Châtelet as representative for the interest of French scholars in Leibniz at that time. As it can be seen from the two publications, Leibnitian ideas governed scientific as well as metaphysical discourses. When Maupertuis was primarily inspired by the Leibnitian possible world problem, which he transformed into a kind of scientific methodology, Du Châtelet examined the principles of contradiction and sufficient reason as fundamental for a systematic reconstruction of a metaphysical base of science. It will be demonstrated that the different approaches to draw a line from Leibniz to early eighteenth century problems paved the way for unique and distinctive metaphysical solutions in Du Châtelet and Maupertuis as well. These solutions have to be understood as first steps to redefine the relationship between metaphysics and science under the condition of Newtonian physics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Maupertuis. 1768b. Lettre. 256.

  2. 2.

    Maupertuis. 1768b. Lettre. 207.

  3. 3.

    Maupertuis. 1768b. Lettre. 211 f.

  4. 4.

    Maupertuis. 1768b. Lettre. 213.

  5. 5.

    Maupertuis. 1768b. Lettre. 224.

  6. 6.

    Maupertuis. 1768b. Lettre. 238.

  7. 7.

    Leibniz. 1998. Monadologie. 60, 62.

  8. 8.

    Leibniz. 1949. Protogaea. 24 ff.

  9. 9.

    Maupertuis. 1768b. Lettre. 241.

  10. 10.

    Inst1742Rep1988 §392.

  11. 11.

    Inst1742Rep1988 §393.

  12. 12.

    Maupertuis. 1768a. Essay de Cosmologie. 42.

  13. 13.

    Inst1742Rep1988 XII.

  14. 14.

    Inst1742Rep1988 XII.

  15. 15.

    Leibniz. 1999. Discours de métaphysique. 1538. The passage reads: “Et si quelcun traçoit tout d’une suite une ligne qui seroit tantost droite, tantost cercle, tantost d’une autre nature, il est possible de trouver une notion ou regle ou equation commune à tous les points de cette ligne, en vertu de la quelle ces mêmes changemens doivent arriver.“

  16. 16.

    See also: Inst1742Rep1988 §13.

  17. 17.

    See also Hecht. 2006. Maupertuis und die Leibniz-Tradition an der Berliner Akademie.

  18. 18.

    Leibniz. 1890. Tentamen Anagogicum. 275.

  19. 19.

    Inst1742Rep1988 §401.

  20. 20.

    Inst1742Rep1988 §403.

  21. 21.

    Inst1742Rep1988 §403.

  22. 22.

    Inst1742Rep1988 §422.

  23. 23.

    Inst1742Rep1988 §427 f.

  24. 24.

    Inst1742Rep1988 §437.

  25. 25.

    Inst1742Rep1988 §437.

  26. 26.

    Maupertuis. 1768a. Essay de Cosmologie. 42.

  27. 27.

    Inst1742Rep1988 §437.

  28. 28.

    Inst1742Rep1988 §437.

  29. 29.

    Inst1742Rep1988 §389.

  30. 30.

    Inst1742Rep1988 §394.

  31. 31.

    Inst1742Rep1988 §340.

  32. 32.

    Inst1742Rep1988 §378.

References

  • Hecht, H. 2006. Maupertuis und die Leibniz-Tradition an der Berliner Akademie. In Hofkultur und aufgeklärte Öffentlichkeit: Potsdam im 18. Jahrhundert im europäischen Kontext, ed. Günther Lottes and Iwan D’Aprile. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, G. W. 1999. Discours de métaphysique. In Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, ed. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, series VI, vol 4, Part B. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, G. W. 1890. Tentamen Anagogicum. In Die philosophischen Schriften, ed. Carl Immanuel Gerhardt, vol 7. Berlin: Weidmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, G. W. 1998. Monadologie, ed. Hartmut Hecht. Stuttgart: Reclam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, G. W. 1949. Protogaea. Transl. by W. v. Engelhardt. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maupertuis, P. L. M. de. 1768a. Essay de Cosmologie. In OEuvres et lettres, vol 1. Lyon: Bruyset.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maupertuis, P. L. M. de. 1768b. Lettre sur la comète qui paroissoit en 1742. In OEuvres et lettres, vol 3. Lyon: Bruyset.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hartmut Hecht .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hecht, H. (2012). In the Spirit of Leibniz – Two Approaches from 1742. In: Hagengruber, R. (eds) Emilie du Châtelet between Leibniz and Newton. International Archives of the History of Ideas / Archives internationales d'histoire des idées, vol 205. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2093-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics