Abstract
The dialogue between cognitive neuroscience and spirituality/mysticism has largely entailed measuring the neural and cognitive effects of spiritual practices. Such research follows from the spiritual traditions’ teachings about the intended psychological effects of practice. The ontologically more challenging postulates of spiritual traditions (e.g., mind beyond brain, ‘higher’ or ‘ultimate’ realities) are ignored when focusing in this way on measurable concomitants of practice. In this chapter I argue that the dialogue should be widened to include some of the ontologically more challenging concepts, where these involve references to the brain and psychological states. A specific example is examined in some detail: the kabbalistic worldview posits a correspondence between higher and lower levels in the cosmos (‘macrocosm’ and ‘microcosm’), and includes notions of unconscious thought arising in ‘brains’ in the Godhead. I demonstrate that the macrocosmic principles advanced in kabbalistic literature display a degree of concordance with the results of current research into the neural correlate of consciousness. I explore the implications of this concordance for the light it may cast on the enduring hard problem of consciousness.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Again, the reductive approach can cover a number of viewpoints, not all of which are necessarily dismissive of mystical practice. Mindful experiences, for example, may be viewed as constructive simply in terms of health benefits. However, my term ‘fantasies’ is meant to convey the fact that in the vast majority of the world’s spiritual traditions, such experiences include transcendent categories (‘soul’, ‘godhead’, ‘world soul’, etc.) which are dismissed as irrelevant in psychological discourse.
- 2.
The ‘deep blue sea’ may be a sacrilegious term to apply to the Ultimate, but I claim dispensation from Rabbi Meir’s aphorism that, ‘blue resembles the colour of the sea, and the sea resembles the colour of the sky, and the sky resembles the colour of the Throne of Glory’ (Talmud, Menakhot 43b)!
- 3.
Wolfson is writing here about the mystical experience of light, and therefore his interest lies with visionary experience. The point stands that more generally for the Jewish mystic, hermeneutics is intertwined with all forms of mystical experience.
The Zohar has assumed canonical status within Judaism as being the teaching par excellence of the ‘secrets of the Torah.’ Kabbalah holds that the Torah comprises revealed and concealed teachings, the latter pertaining to the nature of God and the ways to align oneself with God in order to promote divine beneficence to flow to the world. Thus, the mysticism that pervades the Zohar is one that promotes ‘ascent for the sake of descent,’ as Hellner-Eshed (2009, p. 317) characterises it. The Zohar comprises a corpus of writings, many of which are presented as esoteric commentary on the biblical text, with others cryptically elaborating the structure of the Godhead. Its authorship has been the subject of extensive scholarly debate. The major part of the corpus is seen by most scholars as having been penned in thirteenth-century Spain by Moses de León. This view is opposed by religious authorities who regard the Zohar as having been revealed through miraculous means to the second-century Shimon bar Yohai in the Land of Israel.
- 4.
This term refers to the intermediary realm between the unknowable transcendent God and the natural world. The sefirot are the emanations of God.
- 5.
I make no defence for my “wish to hold onto” this sense of mystery. The key point is that my sense of the mystery is independent of data in cognitive neuroscience. The data themselves do not justify any overarching belief for explanation, be it materialistic or transcendental. I hold onto the sense of mystery for a host of reasons, mainly relating to what I consider to be meaningful values and goals in life. In this chapter I am not attempting to ‘prove’ the truth of kabbalistic, or any other, insights. My point is simply that those insights are worthy of exploration for the relationship they have with observations in the cognitive neuroscience of consciousness.
- 6.
Genesis Rabbah 90:1; Leviticus Rabbah 24:9. The quote is given in the name of Rabbi Levi.
Midrash refers to a corpus of Jewish literature, dating from the second to the twelfth centuries C.E., and still of the utmost importance to the practice of Judaism today. The style of Midrash is largely homiletical, and frequently draws on word play to derive a teaching from a scriptural passage. Jewish mysticism largely draws its intellectual roots from the Midrashic imagination (Idel 1993).
- 7.
Terminology is always difficult here. Obviously, as soon as one engages with the unknown it is no longer ‘unknown!’ Indeed, the prefix ‘un-’ in ‘unconscious’ I find problematic, and for this reason I prefer to use the term ‘preconscious,’ although this does not fully resolve the problem (for further discussion, see Lancaster 2004). Introspectively, my sense is of a region of mind detached from the everyday imposition of I-centeredness, this detached region being always already engaged with the ‘Mystery’ (to use Ferrer and Sherman’s term mentioned earlier). Mystical practice builds bridges between this non-I-centred region of mind and the everyday realm of consciousness (see below).
- 8.
Zohar 2:184a.
- 9.
“Conscious states arise from the integration, or unification, of what are initially two distinct representations, a first-order representation of an external stimulus and a higher-order representation of that first-order representation; once the two representations are unified, they form a single representational state with two parts, one directed at the other and the other directed at the stimulus” (Kriegel 2007, p. 899). I would accord the neuronal input model in Figure 1 the status of first-order representation, and the schemata accessed from memory, the status of second-order representation.
- 10.
- 11.
It is difficult in a short treatment of kabbalistic imagery to substantiate fully my claims about the intended meanings in passages such as this. Indeed, concealment of meaning is one of the hallmarks of the medieval Kabbalah. I have explored this issue at greater length in Lancaster (2005).
- 12.
This verse from the book of Job is often translated as “From where may wisdom be found?” The Hebrew translated as “from where,” if taken more literally, means “from nothingness.” The mystics emphasised this latter meaning since it accords with their understanding that the sphere of Wisdom may be accessed only through annulment of the everyday sense of ‘I’; “Transformation comes about only by passing through nothingness,” writes The Maggid (cited in Matt 1995, p. 87).
- 13.
The point may be misunderstood on account of confusion over the appropriate direction in the spatial metaphor applied to notions of consciousness. Freud famously viewed the unconscious as lower – the portion of an iceberg under water, the basement of a house, etc. However, as Whyte (1962) pointed out, the unconscious might be thought of as higher than the conscious sphere on account of its importance for higher creative and spiritual abilities. It is unfortunate that we are compelled to understand these psychic ideas through spatial metaphor, since we confuse the metaphor with the meaning. There is no spatiality in the psyche. Kabbalistically, higher means closer to the divine. But, the parallel with neuro-cognitive terminology arises by virtue of the critical idea that the terms higher and closer to the divine mean that the process comes earlier in the generation of mental content. This is essentially the meaning of Dov Baer’s term kadmut ha-sekhel, which is why it should be translated as preconscious rather than unconscious.
- 14.
It is worth noting in passing that isomorphism as presented in Kabbalah is conceptually distinct from cognitivism’s representationalism, inasmuch as the latter entails an arbitrary relation between the representation and that represented. Kabbalah asserts that the “mirror” that relates two entities (such as God and human) entails an identity of substance. Indeed, it is axiomatic that such identity is critical for any knowledge; man can know God and God can know man only because they share an essential nature. As Wolfson (2005) remarks, this axiom implies ultimately that there is no non-divine reality. And, we might add, if there is no non-divine reality there is no explanatory gap!
References
Abrams, D. (1994). The book Bahir: An edition based on the earliest manuscripts. Los Angeles: Cherub Press.
Aftanas, L. I., & Golocheikine, S. A. (2002). Non-linear dynamic complexity of the human EEG during meditation. Neuroscience Letters, 330(2), 143–146.
Arzy, S., Idel, M., Landis, T., & Blanke, O. (2005). Speaking with one’s self: Autoscopic phenomena in writings from the ecstatic Kabbalah. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 12(11), 4–29.
Assagioli, R. (1993). Transpersonal development: The dimension beyond psychosynthesis. London: Thorsons.
Barušs, I. (2001). The art of science: Science of the future in light of alterations of consciousness. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 15(1), 57–68.
Beauregard, M., & O’Leary, D. (2007). The spiritual brain: A neuroscientist’s case for the existence of the soul. New York: HarperCollins.
Beauregard, M., & Paquette, V. (2006). Neural correlates of a mystical experience in Carmelite nuns. Neuroscience Letters, 405(3), 186–190.
Beauregard, M., & Paquette, V. (2008). EEG activity in Carmelite nuns during a mystical experience. Neuroscience Letters, 444(1), 1–4.
Boehler, C. N., Schoenfeld, M. A., Heinze, H.-J., & Hopf, J.-M. (2008). Rapid recurrent processing gates awareness in primary visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 8742–8747.
Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York: Basic Books.
Boyer, P., & Bergstrom, B. (2008). Evolutionary perspectives on religion. Annual Review of Anthropology, 37, 111–130.
Cahn, B. R., & Polich, J. (2006). Meditation states and traits: EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 180–211.
Chalmers, D. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2, 200–219.
Crick, F. H. C., & Koch, C. (1990). Towards a neurobiological theory of consciousness. Seminars in the Neurosciences, 2, 263–275.
Dehaene, S., Changeaux, J.-P., Naccache, L., Sackur, J., & Sergent, C. (2006). Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: A testable taxonomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(5), 204–211.
Deikman, A. J. (1966). Deautomatization and the mystic experience. Psychiatry, 29, 324–338.
Edelman, G. M., & Tononi, G. (2000). Reentry and the dynamic core: Neural correlates of conscious experience. In T. Metzinger (Ed.), Neural correlates of consciousness: Empirical and conceptual questions (pp. 138–151). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Engel, A. K., & Singer, W. (2001). Temporal binding and the neural correlates of sensory awareness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(1), 16–25.
Enns, J. T., & di Lollo, V. (2000). What’s new in visual masking? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(9), 345–352.
Fahrenfort, J. J., Scholte, H. S., & Lamme, V. A. (2007). Masking disrupts reentrant processing in human visual cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(9), 1488–1497.
Ferrer, J. N., & Sherman, J. H. (2008). Introduction: The participatory turn in spirituality, mysticism, and religious studies. In J. N. Ferrer & J. H. Sherman (Eds.), The participatory turn: Spirituality, mysticism, religious studies (pp. 1–78). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Firman, J., & Gila, A. (2002). Psychosynthesis: A psychology of the spirit. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Giller, P. (2001). Reading the Zohar: The sacred text of the Kabbalah. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hellner-Eshed, M. (2009). A river flows from Eden: The language of mystical experience in the Zohar (N. Wolski, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (Originally published 2005)
Hunt, H. (2001). Some perils of quantum consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(9–10), 35–45.
Hurwitz, S. (1968). Psychological aspects in early Hasidic literature (H. Nagel, Trans.). In J. Hillman (Ed.), Timeless documents of the soul (pp. 149–239). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Idel, M. (1988). The mystical experience in Abraham Abulafia (J. Chipman, Trans.). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Idel, M. (1993). Midrashic versus other forms of Jewish hermeneutics: Some comparative reflections. In M. Fishbane (Ed.), The Midrashic imagination: Jewish exegesis, thought, and history (pp. 45–58). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Idel, M. (2005a). Kabbalah and Eros. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Idel, M. (2005b). Enchanted chains: Techniques and rituals in Jewish mysticism. Los Angeles: Cherub Press.
Jung, C. G. (1977). In W. McGuire & R. F. C. Hull (Eds.), C. G. Jung speaking: Interviews and encounters. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kriegel, U. (2007). A cross-order integration hypothesis for the neural correlate of consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 16(4), 897–912.
Lamme, V. A. F. (2003). Why visual attention and awareness are different. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(1), 12–18.
Lamme, V. A. F. (2004). Separate neural definitions of visual consciousness and visual attention: A case for phenomenal awareness. Neural Networks, 17(5–6), 861–872.
Lamme, V. A. F. (2006). Towards a true neural stance on consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(11), 494–501.
Lancaster, B. L. (1991). Mind, brain and human potential: The quest for an understanding of self. Shaftesbury: Element Books.
Lancaster, B. L. (1997). On the stages of perception: Towards a synthesis of cognitive neuroscience and the Buddhist Abhidhamma tradition. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 4(2), 122–142.
Lancaster, B. L. (2000). On the relationship between cognitive models and spiritual maps: Evidence from Hebrew language mysticism. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 7(11–12), 231–250.
Lancaster, B. L. (2004). Approaches to consciousness: The marriage of science and mysticism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lancaster, B. L. (2005). The essence of Kabbalah. London: Arcturus.
Lancaster, B. L. (in press). The cognitive neuroscience of consciousness, mysticism and psi. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies.
Legrand, D., & Ruby, P. (2009). What is self-specific? Theoretical investigation and critical review of neuroimaging results. Psychological Review, 116(1), 252–282.
Levine, J. (1983). Materialism and qualia: The explanatory gap. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 64, 354–361.
Luo, Q., Mitchell, D., Cheng, X., Mondillo, K., Mccaffrey, D., Holroyd, T., Carver, F., Coppola, R., & Blair, J. (2009). Visual awareness, emotion, and gamma band synchronization. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 1896–1904.
Lutz, A., Greischar, L. L., Rawlings, N. B., Ricard, M., & Davidson, R. J. (2004). Long-term meditators self-induce high-amplitude gamma synchrony during mental practice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(46), 16369–16373.
Lutz, A., Dunne, J. D., & Davidson, R. J. (2007). Meditation and the neuroscience of consciousness: An introduction. In P. D. Zelado, M. Moscovitch, & E. Thompson (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of consciousness (pp. 499–551). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lutz, A., Slagter, H. A., Dunne, J. D., & Davidson, R. J. (2008). Attention regulation and monitoring in meditation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(4), 163–169.
Magid, S. (2002). Origin and overcoming the beginning: Zimzum as a trope of reading in post-Lurianic Kabbala. In A. Cohen & S. Magid (Eds.), Beginning again: Toward a hermeneutic of Jewish texts (pp. 163–214). New York: Seven Bridges Press.
Matt, D. (1995). Ayin: The concept of nothingness in Jewish mysticism. In L. Fine (Ed.), Essential papers on Kabbalah (pp. 67–108). New York: New York University Press.
Metzinger, T. (2003). Being no one: The self-model theory of subjectivity. Cambridge: Bradford.
Newberg, A., Alavi, A., Baime, M., Pourdehnad, M., Santanna, J., & D’Aquili, E. (2001a). The measurement of regional cerebral blood flow during the complex cognitive task of meditation: A preliminary SPECT study. Psychiatry Research, 106(2), 113–122.
Newberg, A., D’Aquili, E., & Rause, V. (2001b). Why God won’t go away: Brain science and the biology of belief. New York: Ballantine Books.
Pascual-Leone, A., & Walsh, V. (2001). Fast backprojections from the motion to the primary visual area necessary for visual awareness. Science, 292(5516), 510–512.
Persinger, M. A. (1987). Neuropsychological bases of God beliefs. New York: Praeger.
Revonsuo, A. (1999). Binding and the phenomenal unity of consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 8(2), 173–185.
Ro, T. (2010). What can TMS tell us about visual awareness? Cortex, 46(1), 110–113. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.03.005.
Rothberg, D. (2000). Spiritual inquiry. In T. Hart, P. Nelson, & K. Puhakka (Eds.), Transpersonal knowing: Exploring the horizon of consciousness (pp. 161–184). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Scholem, G. G. (1941/1961). Major trends in Jewish mysticism. New York: Schocken Books.
Scholem, G. (1975). Devarim be-Go. Tel Aviv: Am Oved. (Hebrew).
Sergent, C., Baillet, S., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Timing of the brain events underlying access to consciousness during the attentional blink. Nature Neuroscience, 8(10), 1391–1400.
Shokek, S. (2001). Kabbalah and the art of being. London: Routledge.
Singer, W. (1999). Neuronal synchrony: A versatile code for the definition of relations? Neuron, 24(1), 49–65.
Singer, W. (2000). Phenomenal awareness and consciousness from a neurobiological perspective. In T. Metzinger (Ed.), Neural correlates of consciousness: Empirical and conceptual questions (pp. 121–137). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Supèr, H., Spekreijse, H., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2001). Two distinct modes of sensory processing observed in monkey primary visual cortex (V1). Nature Neuroscience, 4, 304–310.
Tishby, I. (1949/1989). The wisdom of the Zohar: An anthology of texts. (D. Goldstein, Trans., 3 Vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Treisman, A. M. (1996). The binding problem. Current Opinions in Neurobiology, 6, 171–178.
Treisman, A. M., & Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14(1), 107–141.
von der Malsburg, C. (1981). The correlation theory of brain function. Internal report 81–2, MPI biophysical chemistry. Reprinted in E. Domany, J. L. van Hemmen, & K. Schulten (Eds.), Models of neural networks II (pp. 95–119). Berlin: Springer (1994).
von der Malsburg, C. (1997). The coherence definition of consciousness. In M. Ito, Y. Miyashita, & E. T. Rolls (Eds.), Cognition, computation, and consciousness (pp. 193–204). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Whyte, L. L. (1962). The unconscious before Freud. London: Tavistock.
Wilber, K. (2006). Integral spirituality: A startling new role for religion in the modern and postmodern world. Boston/London: Integral Books.
Wolfson, E. R. (1994). Through a speculum that shines: Vision and imagination in medieval Jewish mysticism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wolfson, E. R. (2004). Hermeneutics of light in medieval Kabbalah. In M. T. Kapstein (Ed.), The presence of light: Divine radiance and religious experience (pp. 105–118). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wolfson, E. (2005). Language, Eros, being: Kabbalistic hermeneutics and poetic imagination. New York: Fordham University Press.
Zohar. (1978). Margoliot, R. (Ed.), (6th edn., 3 Vols.). Jerusalem: Mosad ha-Rav Kook.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lancaster, B.L. (2011). The Hard Problem Revisited: From Cognitive Neuroscience to Kabbalah and Back Again. In: Walach, H., Schmidt, S., Jonas, W. (eds) Neuroscience, Consciousness and Spirituality. Studies in Neuroscience, Consciousness and Spirituality, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2079-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2079-4_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2078-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2079-4
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)