Abstract
This introductory chapter outlines the problematic and its solution. It articulates some of the main tenets of (radical, individual, social) constructivism. Against these tenets are set some of the phenomena that constructivism cannot explain; it articulates some of the reasons why constructivism cannot explain them, including the inherent, presupposed separation between body and mind. The problems include (a) the learning paradox as framed by Carl Bereiter in the 1980s, which questions the possibility of a cognitive system to construct something of higher complexity than its own; (b) the impossibility to aim at (intend) the construction of knowledge that is inherently unknown (“how can you aim at constructing knowledge when this knowledge itself is required for aiming at it?”); (c) the constitutive role of the lived body in knowing; (d) the role of passivity in learning from experience; and (e) the inherent otherness of knowledge (language) and self. I conclude by foreshadowing the inner coherence of the argument that unfolds in this book.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roth, WM. (2011). De/Constructing the Blind Spots of the Constructivist Metaphor. In: Passibility. Classics in Science Education, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1908-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1908-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1907-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1908-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)