Abstract
Over the course of human history, rural places have been viewed as population reserves for urbanization and industrialization. Rurality was often synonymous with backwardness, and modernization in many countries was conceptualized and understood as a shrinking rural population accompanied by an increasing urban population. Concurrently, policy measures more often promoted urban expansion to the neglect of rural development, and in some cases rural areas were deliberately left undeveloped. The dominant perception of rurality stems from a dichotomous view of what is urban and what is rural, subsequently assuming rural areas are homogeneous. However, this collection of research disputes such overly simplistic views and incomplete policies. Rural areas are increasingly diverse in economic structure, and the presence of certain amenities, historical development patterns, and cultural conditions prompt a reevaluation of rurality. Throughout the international context, contemporary rural areas are confronting several challenges, including managing natural resources, addressing the local impacts of the global economy, and reconceptualizing what “rural” means in a rapidly changing world. Rural demography has much to contribute to understanding the continued evolution of rural populations and places into the 21st century.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Berry, B. (1976). The counterurbanization process: Urban America since 1970. In B. J. L. Berry (Ed.), Urbanization and counterurbanization (pp. 111–143). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Berry, B., & Wheeler, J. (Eds.). (2005). Urban geography in America, 1950–2000. Paradigms and personalities. New York: Routledge.
Brown, D., & Cromartie, J. (2004). The nature of rurality in postindustrial society. In T. Champion & G. Hugo (Eds.), New forms of urbanization: Beyond the urban-rural dichotomy (pp. 269–284). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
Burgess, E. W. (1967) [1925]. The growth of the city: An introduction to a research project. In E. W. Burgess & R. D. McKenzie (Eds.), The city (pp. 47–62). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Castells, M. (1977). The urban question. London: Edward Arnold.
Champion, A. G. (Ed.). (1989). Counterurbanization. The changing pace and nature of population deconcentration. London: Edward Arnold.
Champion, A. G., & Hugo, G. (Eds.). (2004). New forms of urbanization: Beyond the urban-rural dichotomy. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
de Vries, J. (1984). European urbanization 1500–1800. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Fielding, A. J. (1982). Counterurbanization in Western Europe. Progress in Planning, 17, 1–52.
Halfacree, K. (2004). Rethinking ‘rurality’. In T. Champion & G. Hugo (Eds.), New forms of urbanization: Beyond the urban-rural dichotomy (pp. 285–304). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
Jackson, K. (1985). Crabgrass frontier: The suburbanization of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kontuly, T. (1998). Contrasting the counterurbanisation experience in European nations. In P. Boyle & K. Halfacree (Eds.), Migration into rural areas (pp. 61–78). Theories and issues. Chichester: Wiley.
Kulcsár, L. J., & Brown, D. L. (2011). The political economy of urban reclassification in post-socialist Hungary. Regional Studies, 45, 479–490.
Teaford, J. C. (2008). The American suburb. New York: Routledge.
Tilly, C. (Ed.). (1974). Urban world. Boston: Little Brown.
Tisdale, H. (1942). The process of urbanization. Social Forces, 20, 311–316.
United Nations (UN). (2010). World urbanization prospects, the 2009 revision. New York: United Nations (UN).
Vining, D. R., & Kontuly, T. (1978). Population dispersal and major metropolitan regions: An international comparison. International Regional Science Review, 3, 49–73.
White, K. J. C. (2008). Population change and farm dependence: Temporal and spatial variation in the U.S. great plains, 1900–2000. Demography, 45, 363–386.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kulcsár, L.J., Curtis, K.J. (2012). Why Does Rural Demography Still Matter?. In: Kulcsár, L., Curtis, K. (eds) International Handbook of Rural Demography. International Handbooks of Population, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1842-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1842-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1841-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1842-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)