Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cognitive Flexibility and Epistemic Validation in Learning from Multiple Texts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Links Between Beliefs and Cognitive Flexibility

Abstract

Advanced learning in ill-structured domains is frequently based on multiple documents that contain conflicting information and opposing perspectives on the same or related issues (such as multiple texts belonging to a scientific controversy). In such cases, cognitive flexibility can be defined as the ability to develop a justified point of view by adopting some arguments and rejecting others on rational grounds. I suggest that learners can achieve this goal only if they actively and strategically validate incoming text information against previously acquired knowledge and beliefs (epistemic validation, statement 1). Up to now, the cognitive processes underlying epistemic validation have not been addressed by the major theories in the fields of text comprehension and learning from text. I introduce a simple process model according to which epistemic validation rests on two types of cognitive processes, (automatic) epistemic monitoring and (strategic) epistemic elaboration (statement 2). Epistemic monitoring means that learners regularly and efficiently monitor incoming text information for internal consistency and plausibility. In many cases, learners tend to refute new information that conflicts with their prior knowledge or information acquired earlier. Alternatively, learners motivated and able to do so may engage in an effortful and strategic epistemic elaboration of arguments that are initially evaluated as implausible. Finally, I propose that learners’ epistemological beliefs serve as declarative metacognition that is crucial for engagement in epistemic elaboration. As such, epistemological beliefs determine whether learners achieve cognitive flexibility in learning with multiple texts (statement 3).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, R. C. (1985). Role of the reader’s schema in comprehension, learning, and memory. In H. Singer & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. A., Lepper, M. R., & Ross, L. (1980). Perseverance of social theories: The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1037–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britt, M. A., & Angliskas, C. (2002). Improving students’ ability to identify and use source information. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 485–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1973). Going beyond the information given. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science education. Review of Educational Research, 63, 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferretti, T. R., Singer, M., & Patterson, C. (2008). Electrophysiological evidence for the time course of verifying text ideas. Cognition, 108, 881–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H., & Wellman, H. M. (1977). Metamemory. In R. V. Kail & J. W. Hagen (Eds.), Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition (pp. 3–33). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K. (2004). Epistemological understanding as a metacognitive process: Thinking aloud during online searching. Educational Psychologist, 39, 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H. M., & Seifert, C. M. (1994). Sources of the continued influence effect: When misinformation in memory affects later inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1420–1436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inferences, and consciousness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N., Girotto, V., & Legrenzi, P. (2004). Reasoning from inconsistency to consistency. Psychological Review, 111, 640–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W. (1988). The use of knowledge in discourse processing: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchener, K. S. (1983). Cognition, metacognition, and epistemic cognition: A three-level model of cognitive processing. Human Development, 26, 222–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lea, R. B. (1995). On-line evidence for elaborative logical inferences in text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 18–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lea, R. B., Mulligan, E. J., & Walton, J. L. (2005). Accessing distant premise information: How memory feeds reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 387–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowsky, S., Stritzke, W. G. K., Oberauer, K., & Morales, M. (2005). Memory for fact, fiction, and misinformation. Psychological Science, 16, 190–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LimĂłn, M., & Mason, L. (2002). Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L., & Boldrin, A. (2008). Epistemic metacognition in the context of information searching on the web. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Knowing, knowledge and beliefs: Epistemological studies across diverse cultures (pp. 377–404). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKoon, G., Gerrig, R. J., & Greene, S. B. (1996). Pronoun resolution without pronouns: Some consequences of memory-based text processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 919–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, E. J., & Myers, J. L. (1999). Text comprehension: A view from the bottom up. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 35–53). Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otero, J., & Kintsch, W. (1992). Failures to detect contradictions in text: What readers believe versus what they read. Psychological Science, 3, 229–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A., Britt, M. A., & Georgi, M. C. (1995). Text-based learning and reasoning: Studies in history. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A., Rouet, J. F., & Britt, M. A. (1999). Toward a theory of documents representation. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 99–122). Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieschl, S., Stahl, E., & Bromme, R. (2008). Epistemological beliefs and self-regulated learning with hypertext. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, T. (2003). Epistemologische Einschätzungen beim Textverstehen [Epistemic validation in text comprehension]. Lengerich, Germany: Pabst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, T., & Schmid, S. (2010). Epistemological beliefs and epistemic strategies in self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 5, 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, T., Schroeder, S., & Wöhrmann, B. (2009). You don’t have to believe everything you read: Background knowledge permits fast and efficient validation of information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 538–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L., Lepper, M. R., & Hubbard, M. (1975). Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: Biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 880–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L., Lepper, M. R., Strack, F., & Steinmetz, J. (1977). Social explanation and social expectation: Effects of real and hypothetical explanations on subjective likelihood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 817–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouet, J. F. (2006). The skills of document use: From text comprehension to web-based learning. Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouet, J. F., Britt, M. A., Mason, R. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1996). Using multiple sources of evidence to reason about history. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 478–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmalhofer, F., & Glavanov, D. (1986). Three components of understanding a programmer’s manual: Verbatim, propositional, and situational representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 279–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, S., & Lutz, A. (2007). Epistemologische Ăśberzeugungen als kohärente Laientheorien [Epistemological beliefs as coherent lay theories]. Zeitschrift fĂĽr Pädagogische Psychologie, 21, 29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, S., Richter, T., & Hoever, I. (2008). Getting a picture that is both accurate and stable: Situation models and epistemic validation. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 237–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M. (2006). Verification of text ideas during reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 574–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M., Halldorson, M., Lear, J. C., & Andrusiak, P. (1992). Validation of causal bridging inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 507–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, R. J., Coulson, R. L., Feltovich, P. J., & Anderson, D. K. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In V. Patel (Ed.), Tenth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 375–383). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, R. J., & Jehng, J. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 163–205). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, E., & Bromme, R. (2007). The CAEB: An instrument for measuring connotative aspects of epistemological beliefs. Learning and Instruction, 17, 773–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng, Y., van den Broek, P., Kendeou, P., & Lee, C. (2005). The computational implementation of the Landscape Model: Modeling inferential processes and memory representations of text comprehension. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 37, 277–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Broek, P. (2005). Integrating memory-based and constructionist processes in accounts of reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, 39, 299–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Broek, P., Risden, K., Fletcher, C. R., & Thurlow, R. (1996). A “landscape” view of reading: Fluctuating patterns of activation and the construction of a stable memory representation. In B. K. Britton & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 165–187). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, J. F., & Wiley, J. (1997). Developing understanding while writing essays in history. International Journal of Educational Research, 27, 255–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, J., & Voss, J. F. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 301–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG; grants RI 1100/4-1 and RI 1100/5-1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany

    Tobias Richter

Authors
  1. Tobias Richter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobias Richter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Centr. Instructiepsychol.&-technologie, K.U. Leuven, Andreas Vesaliusstraat 2, Leuven, 3000, Belgium

    Jan Elen

  2. Pädagogische Hochschule Freiburg, Kunzenweg 21, Freiburg, 79117, Germany

    Elmar Stahl

  3. Inst. Psychologie III, Methodenlehre, Entwicklungspsychologie,, Universität Münster, Fliednerstr. 21, Münster, 48149, Germany

    Rainer Bromme

  4. , Subfaculteit Psychologie en Pedagogische, K.U. Leuven, Etienne Sabbelaan 53, Kortrijk, 8500, Belgium

    Geraldine Clarebout

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Richter, T. (2011). Cognitive Flexibility and Epistemic Validation in Learning from Multiple Texts. In: Elen, J., Stahl, E., Bromme, R., Clarebout, G. (eds) Links Between Beliefs and Cognitive Flexibility. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1793-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation