Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

When Good Turns to Bad: An Examination of Governance Failure in a Not-for-Profit Enterprise

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Corporate Governance and Business Ethics

Part of the book series: Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy ((SEEP,volume 39))

  • 4503 Accesses

Abstract

This paper examines the assumption that is present in society (if not in law) that not-for-profit enterprises are unlikely to exhibit unethical behaviour in their governance function. It explores this issue by examining a recent case of governance failure within a not-for-profit social enterprise that had unethical behaviour at its root. This failure ultimately led to the organisation becoming bankrupt. A parallel is drawn with governance failures within the private sector which also resulted in bankruptcy. The paper draws on theories of governance and stakeholder management in order to reflect on whether unethical governance behaviour is a continuing threat to all sectors. In doing so, it concludes that there is merit in challenging the assumption that values-based organisations are immune to such a threat to their organisational existence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For an example, see Hayden (2006).

  2. 2.

    Thanks go to Chris Chinnock, an MSc student at the University of Huddersfield who conducted the primary data collection.

References

  • Abzug, R., and J. Galaskiewicz. 2001. Nonprofit boards: Crucibles of expertise of symbols of local identities? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 30: 51–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bart, C., and K. Deal. 2006. The governance role of the board in corporate strategy: A comparison of board practices in ‘For Profit’ and ‘Not For Profit’ organisations. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 2: 2–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berle, A.A., and G.C. Means. 1932/1991. The modern corporation and private property. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouckaert, L., and J. Vandenhove. 1998. Business ethics and the management of non-profit institutions. Journal of Business Ethics 17: 1073–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W.A. 2002. Inclusive governance practices in nonprofit organizations and implications for practice. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 12: 369–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J., and S.B. Rodrigues. 2004. Repairing the breach of trust in corporate governance. Corporate Governance 12: 143–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, T. 2005. Accounting for Enron: Shareholder value and stakeholder interests. Corporate Governance 13: 598–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dart, R. 2004. The legitimacy of social enterprise. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 14: 411–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., and L.E. Preston. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review 20: 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, A., and C.A. Riley. 2004. Supporting the not-for-profit sector: The government’s review of charitable and social enterprise. The Modern Law Review 67: 632–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 13 September 32–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodpaster, K. 1993. Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. In Applied ethics: A reader, ed. E.R. Winkler and J.R. Coombs, 229–248. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosvold, J., S. Brammer, and B. Rayton. 2007. Board diversity in the United Kingdom and Norway: An exploratory analysis. Business ethics: A European review 16: 344–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, E.W. 2006. Governance failures also occur in the non-profit world. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 2: 116–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, D. 2003. Review of the role and effectiveness of non-executive directors. London: Department of Trade and Industry, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, W. 1995. The state we’re in. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iecovich, E. 2005. The profile of board membership in Israeli voluntary organisations. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 16: 161–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, N. 2008. The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letza, S., X. Sun, and J. Kirkbride. 2004. Shareholding versus stakeholding: A critical review of corporate governance. Corporate Governance 12: 242–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, C., and C. Cowton. 2004. Beyond stakeholder engagement: The challenges of stakeholder participation in corporate governance. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1: 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, C., J. Kirkbride, and D. Bryde. 2007. From stakeholders to institutions: The changing face of social enterprise governance theory. Management Decision 45: 284–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller-Millesen, J.L. 2003. Understanding the behaviour of nonprofit boards of directors: A theory-based approach. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 32: 521–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monks, R.A.G., and N. Minow. 2008. Corporate governance, 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, L.D. 2007. Internal governance in the nonprofit boardroom: A participant observer study. Corporate governance 15: 923–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J. 2003. Social enterprise in anytown. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruigrok, W., S. Peck, and S. Tacheva. 2007. Nationality and gender diversity on Swiss corporate boards. Corporate Governance 15: 546–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samra-Fredericks, D. 2000. Doing ‘Boards-In-Action’ research – an ethnographic approach for the capture and analysis of directors’ and senior managers’ interactive routines. Corporate Governance 8: 244–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. 2000. Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, E. 2000. The defects of stakeholder theory. Corporate Governance 8: 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, S. 2007. Analysing network governance of public assets. Corporate Governance 15: 1079–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK

    Chris Low (Head of the Division of Health and Wellbeing)

Authors
  1. Chris Low
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Low .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Inst. Philosophie, Universität Bayreuth, Universitätsstr. 30, Bayreuth, 95447, Germany

    Alexander Brink

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Low, C. (2011). When Good Turns to Bad: An Examination of Governance Failure in a Not-for-Profit Enterprise. In: Brink, A. (eds) Corporate Governance and Business Ethics. Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1588-2_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation