Skip to main content

Through Boom and Bust: Coping with Poverty in Sea Snail Fisheries on the Turkish Black Sea Coast

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Poverty Mosaics: Realities and Prospects in Small-Scale Fisheries

Abstract

Small-scale fisheries for the introduced sea snail (Rapana venosa) have seen booms followed by irreversible bust. This chapter focuses on the role of this fishery relative to poverty dynamics on the Turkish Black Sea coast, and explores how fishers cope with boom and bust, respectively. We consider poverty as a multi-faceted issue and analyze in some detail fishers’ income, social security, health, education, housing, as well as people’s own, culturally-informed perception of what constitutes poverty. Yet, our analysis aims beyond a descriptive account of poverty among fishers, and queries the epistemological status of the vicious circle model. Thus, we discuss how sea snail fishing has also constituted a way out of poverty; that it is uncertain whether overfishing can be blamed for the bust; that contextual factors, such as state welfare and agricultural policies, international organizations, and world economic dynamics, can have significant impact on poverty and wealth among the coastal population of the Black Sea coast of Turkey. The boom years of the sea snail fisheries clearly created a frontier situation inhibiting prospects of co-management between the state and communities of fishers. The observed lack of collective action among fishers and their concomitant incapacity to participate can be considered a dimension of poverty. Therefore, fishery development should not only go hand in hand with fishery management, but also with social policies aimed at reducing poverty and inequality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

     With an HDI value of 0.806, Turkey ranks lower (79) on this composite scale than on the GDP/capita ranking (63) (UNDP 2009).

  2. 2.

     Of Turkey’s total population in 2000, 23 million were considered rural and 44 million urban. In 2009, this had changed to 17.8 million rural, and 54.8 million urban (TURKSTAT 2010).

  3. 3.

     These developments have, especially during the last 10 years, led social scientists in Turkey to apply theoretical perspectives from the international poverty literature to studies in Turkey. These studies include the relations between globalization and poverty (Şenses 2001); social policies in the face of poverty (Buğra 2008); quantitative and qualitative studies of migration and urban poverty (e.g., Işık and Pınarcıoğlu 2001); and comparative qualitative studies of the “condition of poverty” in different parts of Turkey (Erdoğan 2007). Case studies of poverty and poverty alleviation initiatives in Turkey are collected in a recent anthology (Oktik 2008). Parallel to this, the Turkish Statistical Institute (TURKSTAT), and the State Planning Organization have intensified data collection directed at providing relevant information on the degree and character of poverty in Turkey. International organizations (esp. the World Bank and UNDP), as well as national research institutions, have often relied on data from TURKSTAT to explore and analyze poverty in Turkey.

  4. 4.

     Çarşıbaşı is the district in the province outside of the city that has the lowest unemployment rate (MEF 2008), and the highest proportion (13.12% in 2000 (SPO 2004a)) of industrial employment (MEF 2008, pp. XII-70). The service sector is also a major employer. The GNP/capita in Çarşıbaşı was 2,756 USD in 1996 (2,137 in the Province of Trabzon) (SAG 2005, p. 41); which was close to the national average (2,888 USD/capita), and made it the richest district in Trabzon after the city of Trabzon itself.

  5. 5.

     SSK (Sosyal Sigortalar Kurumu) is the public social insurance foundation for all salaried employees outside of state civil servants. Bağ-Kur (Esnaf Ve SanatkâRlar Ve Diger Bagimsiz Çalisanlar Sosyal Sigortalar Kurumu) is a publicly administered social security foundation for the self-employed, including farmers and fishers.

  6. 6.

     All personal names of informants referred to in this chapter are pseudonyms.

  7. 7.

     During this period, he and his brother continuously set nets for whiting and delivered 31 landings to the auction in Trabzon. For the total of 412 k caught, they were paid 1,590 TL. Expenses: Fuel – 340, commission at auction – 92, transport to harbor and to auction –185, and wear and tear of nets – 150. One fishing trip lasts for approximately 3 h. In addition, comes travel time to the auction in Trabzon. This calculation has not taken into consideration investment and repair of the boat. It is worth noticing that, during this period, fish prices were relatively high since trawl fisheries had not yet started and because the Ramadan fell within this period (makes for higher demand of fish).

  8. 8.

     Category 1–2 of the total of six categories in Turkish authorities’ categorization of agricul­tural lands, primarily based upon soil quality, degree of inclination, and exposure to erosion (SABEK 2005).

  9. 9.

     Story extracted from conversations during participant observation in Terme, April 2009.

  10. 10.

     “Kocareis,” usually middle-aged men mobilising men from own village/region to work as crew on purse seiners in Istanbul. They are remunerated with agreed-upon shares from the boat’s profit.

  11. 11.

     While the percentage of fishers having green cards does not seem to have decreased, the percentage of green card holders among the overall population went down from 2006 to 2009 in the Province of Samsun from 26% to 16%, and in the District of Terme from 36% to 23% (MHT 2009).

  12. 12.

     In 2000, only 83.6% (SPO 2004a) were literate (national average in 2000 was 87%). A local newspaper article stressed that the high schools in Terme are particularly unsuccessful in getting their students into university (only 26 out of 1127 graduates over the period of 2005–2007 (Samsun Halk Gazetesi, 10 March 2008)).

  13. 13.

     Yakup Korkmaz’ story is based on informal conversation and response to questionnaire, Terme April 2009.

  14. 14.

     In one processing plant, more than 50% of the processed sea snails were in the smallest of the seven size categories. Processed sea snails are sorted into the following size categories: 3L (Extra Large): 1–15 pcs/kg; LL (Extra Large): 15–20 pcs/kg; L (Large): 20–40 pcs/kg; M (Medium): 40–60 pcs/kg; S (Small): 60–80 pcs/kg; SS (Small): 80–120 pcs/kg; 3S (Small): 120 – up pcs/kg (Fora Food webpages: http://www.forafood.com/topshell.htm, accessed 08 Dec 2010).

  15. 15.

     While the largest of the sea snail factories exported 988 t in 2007, export in 2008 had fallen to 422 t (Samsun Halk Gazetesi, 13 April 2009).

  16. 16.

     The Kurds in the Çangallar village owned 6 boats in this 12 m-p boat class, but sold them all in 2008. All Romani sea snail fishers were trying to sell out in 2009. The number of multi-purpose boats in Yalı Mahallesi decreased by 15, from 2005 to 2009.

  17. 17.

     The tightening of inspection seems to be partly a result of EU-pressure in the process of adapting Turkish fishery policy to the Common Fishery Policy in the EU. In practice, policing authority was transferred from the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs’ local Protection and Control branches to the Coast Guard under military command. They are better equipped and possibly less corrupt.

  18. 18.

     From place 240 in 1996 to 436 in 2004 (out of more than 872 districts in Turkey) (SABEK 2005).

  19. 19.

     Share of agriculture in Turkish GDP fell from 17% in 1990 to 12% in 2005, and share of economically active population engaged in agriculture has decreased from 47% in 1990 to 27% in 2006 (Çakmak and Eruygur 2008, p. 174).

  20. 20.

     Internal dynamic toward younger age at reproduction, and smaller average size typical of introduced invasive species.

  21. 21.

     After sea snail fisheries (and associated illegal trawling) discontinued in Trabzon, fishers report during conversations with us in 2008 and 2009 that catches of red mullet are again very good, after having been very meager during the 1990s and early 2000s.

References

  • Acheson JM (1981) Anthropology of fishing. Annu Rev Anthropol 10:275–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Akder H (2000) Türkiye’de Bölgesel Eşitsizlikler ve Kırsal Yoksulluk. In: Akder H, Güvenç M (eds.) Yoksulluk. TESEV Yayını, İstanbul, pp 15–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkan I, Kiliç O (2007) Samsun İli Terme İlçesinin ova ve yüksek kesimindeki fındık işletmecilerin karşılaştırmalı ekonomik analizi. J Fac Agric, Ondokuz Mayis Universitesi 22(2):171–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison EH, Ellis F (2001) The livelihoods approach and management of small-scale fisheries. Mar Policy 25(5):377–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum HS (2001) Citizen participation. In: Smelser NJ, Baltes PB (eds.) International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. Oxford, Pergamon, pp 1840–1846

    Google Scholar 

  • Béné C (2003) When fishery rhymes with poverty: a first step beyond the old paradigm on poverty in small-scale fisheries. World Dev 31(6):949–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brox O (1990) Common property theory: epistemological status and analytical utility. Hum Organ 49(3):227–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Buğra A (2008) Kapitalizm Yoksulluk ve Türkiye’de Sosyal Politika. İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Buğra A, Keyder Ç (2005) Poverty and social policy in contemporary Turkey. Unpublished manuscript, Istanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Çakmak EH, Eruygur HO (2008) Food, rural, agricultural, and fisheries policies in Turkey. Options méditerranéenns, Séries B 61:165–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdoğan N (ed.) (2007) Yoksulluk Halleri. İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Eruygur HO (2006) Impacts of policy changes on Turkish agriculture: an optimization model with maximum entropy. Unpublished Doctor of Philosophy, The Middle East Technical University, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • GoS (2009) Nüfus Durumu. Samsun: Governorship of Samsun homepages

    Google Scholar 

  • Gülçubuk B, Aluftekin N (2006) Impact of international agricultural policies on rural poverty in Turkey. Int Bus Econ Res J 5(1):9–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Işık O, Pınarcıoğlu MM (2001) Nöbetleşe Yoksulluk. İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen S (1997) A comparative study of fishing communities and public awareness in Turkey and Ukraine. Black Sea Environmental Programme, Istanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen S (1998) What role for the Turkish fishery co-operatives? Organisational preconditions for a new management regime in the Black Sea. In: Paper presented at the FISHECO’98: The Proceedings of the first international symposium on fisheries and ecology, Trabzon

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen S (2006) Between life giver and leisure: identity negotiation through seafood in Turkey. Int J Middle East Studies 38(3):395–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen S (2009) Fishers and scientists in modern Turkey. The management of resources, knowledge and identity on the Eastern Black Sea Coast. Berghahn Books, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen S, Zengin M (2006) Case study 2: Trawl and sea snail fisheries in Samsun, Black Sea coast of Turkey. Deliverable 5.2

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen S, Zengin M, Koçak MH (2010) Identifying drivers for fishing pressure. A multidisciplinary study of trawl and sea snail fisheries in Samsun, Black Sea coast of Turkey. Ocean Coast Manage 53(5–6):252–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopytoff I (1987) The African frontier. The reproduction of traditional African societies. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Köse AH, Bahçe S (2009) Yoksulluk’ Yazınının Yoksulluğu: Toplumsal Sınıflarla Düşünmek. Praksis 19(1):385–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangahas MF (2000) Managing luck and negotiating change-ethnographies of fishing and sharing in the Philippines. University of Cambridge, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • McGoodwin JR (1990) Crisis in the World’s fisheries. People, Problems, and Policies. Stanford: Stanford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • MEF (2008). Ordu-Trabzon-Rize-Giresun-Gümüşhane-Artvin Planlama Bölgesi 1/100.000 Ölçekli Çevre Düzeni Planı Araştırma Raporu. Ministry of Environment and Forest, Republic of Turkey, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • MHT (2009) Yeşil kart kayıtlarının ilçelere göre dağılımı (İptal edilen yeşil kartlılar dahil değildir). The Ministry of Health of Turkey, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Oktik N (ed.) (2008) Türkiye’de Yoksulluk Çalışmalar. Yakın Kitabevi Yayınları, İzmir

    Google Scholar 

  • Özbudun S, Başokçu EK (2004) Bizim Köyde Yoksulluk Yok Ki!’ ya da Yoksunluktan Yoksulluğa Türkiye Kırsalı Üzerine Notlar. Toplum ve Hekim 19(1):39–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly D (1994) From growth to Malthusian overfishing: stages of fisheries resources misuse. Tradit Mar Resour Manage Knowledge Info Bull 3:7–14

    Google Scholar 

  • SABEK (2005) Samsun İl gelişim stratejisi. Mevcut durum ve analizi raporu. Samsun Bölgesel Ekonomik Kalkınma, Samsun

    Google Scholar 

  • SAG (2005) Trabzon yatırım ortamı ve yapabilecek yatırımlar araştırması. Sanayi Araştırma ve Geliştirme Genel Müdürlüğü, Republic of Turkey Ministry of Industry and Trade, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins M (1972) Stone age economics. Tavistock Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1983) Development: which way now? Econ J 93(372):745–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1999) Development as freedom. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Şenses F (2001) Küreselleşmenin Öteki Yüzü Yoksulluk. İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • SPO (2004a) İlçelerin sosyo-ekonomik gelişimlik sıralaması araştırması. Turkish Republic State Planning Organization, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • SPO (2004b) Yeşilırmak havza gelişim projesi (Amasya, Çorum, Samsun, Tokat) Mevcut durum ve analizi. Turkish Republic State Planning Organization, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Termehaber(2010) Termenin Nüfus ve Sosyal Yapısı, 2010, from http://www.termehaber.com/haber-358-Termenin-Nüfus-ve-Sosyal-Yapısı.html

  • Tsing AL (2005) Friction. An ethnography of global connection. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • TURKSTAT (2004) Turkey’s statistical yearbook 2004. Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • TURKSTAT (2009) Results of 2008 poverty study. Turkish Statistical Institute, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • TURKSTAT (2010) Adrese dayalı nüfus kayıt sistemi nüfus sayım sonuçları, 2009. TURKSTAT Haber Bülteni, 2010(15)

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (2009) Human development report 2009, Turkey. The human development index – going beyond income, United Nations Development Programme

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2003) Turkey. Poverty and coping after crises (No. 24185-TR): World Bank, Human Development Unit, Europe and Central Asia Region, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoltar Ç (2009) When the poor need health care: ethnography of state and citizenship in Turkey. Middle Eastern Studies 45(5):767–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

In addition to funding from the PovFish project, the research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme [FP7/2007–2013]: Knowledge-based Sustainable Management for Europe’s Seas (EC FP7 – grant 226675). The KnowSeas project is affiliated with LOICZ and LWEC. The authors want to thank research assistants Özlem Yeniay and Kayhan Ural for their very competent participation during fieldwork and data assessment. We are deeply indebted to all the informants who willingly shared time and information with us. This work would not have been possible without fishers, fisher wives, scientists, managers, factory owners, and others being so forthcoming. Thanks to them all!

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ståle Knudsen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Knudsen, S., Koçak, H. (2011). Through Boom and Bust: Coping with Poverty in Sea Snail Fisheries on the Turkish Black Sea Coast. In: Jentoft, S., Eide, A. (eds) Poverty Mosaics: Realities and Prospects in Small-Scale Fisheries. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1582-0_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics