Skip to main content

Terms and Concepts of Methods of Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Epidemiological Research: Terms and Concepts
  • 102k Accesses

Abstract

See note opening section II – 2.

Blinding * – In the methodology of a study, an arrangement making the observers unaware of certain facts (that might bias their observations); also: the counterpart of this in respect to the study subjects (notably as to the category of intervention to which they were assigned in an intervention-prognostic study, so as to prevent this influencing their engagement in extraneous interventions and/or their reporting on their experiences).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Porta M (Editor), Greenland S, Last JM (Associate Editors). A Dictionary of Epidemiology. Fifth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Miettinen OS. Etiologic study vis-à-vis intervention study. Eur J Epidemiol 2010; 25: 671-5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Miettinen OS. Up from Clinical Epidemiology & EBM. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Miettinen OS. Efficacy of therapeutic practice: will epidemiology provide the answers? In: Melmon KL (Editor). Drug Therapeutics. Concepts for Physicians. New York: Elsevier – North Holland, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Miettinen OS. The need for randomization in the study of intended effects. Statist Med 1983; 2: 267-71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Glasser SP, Williams OD. Data Safety and Monitoring Boards (DSMBs). In: Glasser SB (Editor). Essentials of Clinical Research. Dordrecht (NL): Springer, 2008.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Wiggins D. Ethics. Twelve Lectures on the Philosophy of Morality. London: Penquin Books, 2006; p. 147.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Scull A. Madhouse. A Tragic Tale of Megalomania and Modern Medicine. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53: 457-81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Greenwood M. A report on the natural duration of cancer. In: Reports on Public Health and Medical Subjects, Vol 33. London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1926; pp. 1-26.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Miettinen OS. Survival analysis: up from Kaplan-Meier-Greenwood. Eur J Epidemiol 2008; 23: 585-92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. S. Miettinen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Miettinen, O.S. (2011). Terms and Concepts of Methods of Study. In: Epidemiological Research: Terms and Concepts. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1171-6_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics