Skip to main content

Detecting specific populations in mixtures

  • Chapter
Genetics of Subpolar Fish and Invertebrates

Part of the book series: Developments in environmental biology of fishes ((DEBF,volume 23))

  • 160 Accesses

Abstract

Mixed stock analysis (MSA) estimates the relative contributions of distinct populations in a mixture of organisms. Increasingly, MSA is used to judge the presence or absence of specific populations in specific mixture samples. This is commonly done by inspecting the bootstrap confidence interval of the contribution of interest. This method has a number of statistical deficiencies, including almost zero power to detect small contributions even if the population has perfect identifiability. We introduce a more powerful method based on the likelihood ratio test and compare both methods in a simulation demonstration using a 17 population baseline of sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka, from the Kenai River, Alaska, watershed. Power to detect a nonzero contribution will vary with the population(s) identifiability relative to the rest of the baseline, the contribution size, mixture sample size, and analysis method. The demonstration shows that the likelihood ratio method is always more powerful than the bootstrap method, the two methods only being equal when both display 100% power. Power declines for both methods as contribution declines, but it declines faster and goes to zero for the bootstrap method. Power declines quickly for both methods as population identifiability declines, though the likelihood ratio test is able to capitalize on the presence of ¡®perfect identification¡¯ characteristics, such as private alleles. Given the baseline-specific nature of detection power, researchers are encouraged to conduct a priori power analyses similar to the current demonstration when planning their applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aitchison, J.A. 1992. On criteria for measures of compositional difference. Math. Geol. 24: 365-379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, M.A. & W. Eichert. 2000. WHICHRUN (Version 3.2) a computer program for population assignment of individuals based on multilocus genotype data. J. Hered. 91: 87-89.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Begg, G.A., K.D. Friedland & J.B. Pearce. 1999. Stock identification - its role in stock assessment and fisheries management. Fish. Res. 43: 1-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornuet, J.M., S. Piry, G. Luikart, A. Estoup & M. Solignac. 1999. New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origins of individuals. Genetics 153: 1989-2000.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, A.C. & D.V. Hinkley. 1997. Bootstrap Methods and their Application, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 582 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debevec, E.M., R.B. Gates,M.Masuda, J.J. Pella, J.H. Reynolds & L.W. Seeb. 2000. SPAM (version 3.2): Statistics Program for Analyzing Mixtures. J. Hered. 91: 509-511.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, D.A., T.D. Beacham, B.E. Ridell & C.A. Busack. 1984. Estimating stock composition in mixed stock fisheries using morphometric, meristic, and electrophoretic characteristics. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 41: 400-408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoenig, J.M. & D.M. Heisey. 2001. The abuse of power: The pervasive fallacy of power calculations of data analysis. Amer. Stat. 55: 19-25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ihssen, P.E., H.E. Booke, J.M. Casselman, J.M. McGlade, N.R. Payne & F.M. Utter. 1981. Stock identification: Materials and methods. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 38: 1838-1855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunneborg, C.E. 2000. Data Analysis by Resampling: Concepts and Applications, Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CA, U.S.A. 568 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, S., D. Bernard, R. Conrad, B. Cross, D. McBride, A. McGregor, S. McPherson, G. Oliver, S. Sharr & B. Van Allen. 1987. Application of scale patterns analysis to the management of Alaska¡¯s sockeye salmon (Onchorhynchus nerka) fisheries. pp. 207-326. In: H.D. Smith, L. Margolis & C.C. Wood (ed.) Sockeye Salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) Population Biology and Future Management, Canadian Special Pub. on Fish. and Aquat. Sci. 96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, R.B. 1987. Maximum likelihood estimation of mixed stock fishery composition. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 44: 583-590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, G.B., D.J. Teel, F.M. Utter & C.L. Burley. 1981. Columbia River stock identification study: Validation of genetic method. Final report of research (FY80) financed by Bonneville Power Administration Contract DE-A179-80BP18488, National Marine Fisheries Service, Northwest and Alaska Fisheries Center, Seattle, WA. 35 pp.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moles, A. & K. Jensen. 2000. Prevalence of the sockeye salmon brain parasite Myxobolus arcticus in selected Alaska streams. Alaska Fish. Res. Bull. 6: 85-93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J.M., B.J. Pierson, S.L. Talbot, D.V. Derksen,D.Kraege & K.T. Scribner. 2000. A genetic evaluation of morphology used to identify harvested Canada geese. J. Wild. Manag. 64: 863-874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pella, J.J. & M. Masuda. 2001. Bayesian methods for stockmixture analysis from genetic characters. Fish. Bull. 99: 151-167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pella, J.J.&G.B. Milner. 1987. Useofgenetic marksinstock composition analysis. pp. 247-276. In: N. Ryman & F. Utter (ed.) Population Genetics and Fishery Management, Washington Sea Grant Program, Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redner, R.A. & H.F. Walker. 1984. Mixture densities, maximum likelihood and the EM algorithm. Soc. Indust. Appl. Math. Rev. 26: 195-239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, J.H. 2001. SPAM version 3.5: User’s guide addendum. Addendum to special publication No. 15, Alaska Dept. of Fish and Game, Commercial Fisheries Division, Gene Conservation Lab, 333 Raspberry Rd., Anchorage, AK, 99518-1599 (available:http://www.cf.adfg.state.ak.us/geninfo/research/genetics/Software/SpamPage.htm).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, J.H. & W.D. Templin. 2003. Testing component contributions in finite discrete mixtures: detecting specific populations in mixed stock fisheries. pp. 2873-2878. In: Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings, New York, New York, Aug. 11-15, 2002. Am. Stat. Assoc.,Alexandria,VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruzzante, D.E., C.T. Taggart, S. Lang & D. Cook. 2000. Mixed-stock analysis of Atlantic cod near the Gulf of St. Lawrence based on microsatellite DNA. Ecol. Appl. 10: 1090-1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeb, L.W. & P.A. Crane. 1999. Allozymes and mitochondrial NDA discriminate Asian and North American populations of chum salmon in mixed-stock fisheries along the south coast of the Alaska Peninsula. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 128: 88-103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seeb, L.W., C. Habicht, W.D. Templin, K.E. Tarbox, R.Z. Davis, L.K. Brannian & J.E. Seeb 2000. Genetic diversity of sockeye salmon of Cook Inlet, Alaska, and its application to management of populations affected by the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 129: 1223-1249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaklee, J.B., F.W. Allendorf, D.C. Morizot & G.S. Whitt. 1990. Gene nomenclature for protein-coding loci in fish. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 119: 2-15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shaklee, J.B., T.D. Beacham, L. Seeb & B.A. White. 1999. Managing fisheries using genetic data: Case studies from four species of Pacific salmon. Fish. Res. 43: 45-78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smouse, P.E., R.S. Waples & J.A. Tworek. 1990. A genetic mixture analysis for use with incomplete source population data. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 47: 620-634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, A., J.K. Ord & S. Arnold. 1999. Kendall¡¯s Advanced Theory of Statistics Vol 2A: Classical Inference and the Linear Model, 6th edition, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, U.S.A. 885 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urawa, S., K. Nagasawa, L. Margolis & A. Moles. 1998. Stock identification of chinook salmon (Onchorhynchus tshawytscha) in the North Pacific Ocean and Bering Sea by parasite tags. Nor. Pacific Anadro. Fish. Com. Bull.1: 199-204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, B.S. 1996. Genetic data analysis II, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, U.S.A. 445 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Anthony J. Gharrett Richard G. Gustafson Jennifer L. Nielsen James E. Seeb Lisa W. Seeb William W. Smoker Gary H. Thorgaard Richard L. Wilmot

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reynolds, J.H., Templin, W.D. (2004). Detecting specific populations in mixtures. In: Gharrett, A.J., et al. Genetics of Subpolar Fish and Invertebrates. Developments in environmental biology of fishes, vol 23. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0983-6_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0983-6_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3759-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0983-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics