Skip to main content

Non-Deterministic Semantics for Logical Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Philosophical Logic

Part of the book series: Handbook of Philosophical Logic ((HALO,volume 16))

Abstract

The principle of truth-functionality (or compositionality) is a basic principle in many-valued logic in general, and in classical logic in particular. According to this principle, the truth-value of a complex formula is uniquely determined by the truth-values of its subformulas. However, real-world information is inescapably incomplete, uncertain, vague, imprecise or inconsistent, and these phenomena are in an obvious conflict with the principle of truth-functionality. One possible solution to this problem is to relax this principle by borrowing from automata and computability theory the idea of non-deterministic computations, and apply it in evaluations of truth-values of formulas. This leads to the introduction of non-deterministic matrices (Nmatrices) — a natural generalization of ordinary multi-valued matrices, in which the truth-value of a complex formula can be chosen nondeterministically out of some non-empty set of options. There are many natural motivations for introducing non-determinism into the truth-tables of logical connectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Almukdad A. and D. Nelson, Constructible falsity and inexact predicates, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 49:231–333, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arieli O. and A. Avron, Reasoning with Logical Bilattices, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 5:25–63, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Artemov, H. Barringer, A.S. d’Avila Garcez, L.C. Lamb and J. Woods, We Will Show Them! Essays in Honour of Dov Gabbay, vol. 1, College Publications, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Avron, A., Simple consequence relations, Information and Computation, 92:105–139, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Avron, A., Gentzen-Type Systems, Resolution and Tableaux, Journal of Automated Reasoning, 10:265–281, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Avron, A. and I. Lev, Canonical Propositional Gentzen-type Systems, Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Automated Reasoning (IJCAR 2001), R. Gore, A. Leitsch, T. Nipkow (eds.), Springer Verlag, LNAI 2083, 529-544, Springer Verlag, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Avron, A. and I. Lev, Non-deterministic Multi-valued Structures, Journal of Logic and Computation, 15:241–261, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Avron, A., A Nondeterministic View on Nonclassical Negations, Studia Logica, 80:159–194, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Avron, A., Non-deterministic Matrices and Modular Semantics of Rules, Logica Universalis, J.-Y. Beziau ed., Birkhűser Verlag, 149–167, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Avron, A. Logical Non-determinism as a Tool for Logical Modularity: An Introduction, [Artemov et.al. (eds.), 2005], 105–124, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Avron, A. and B. Konikowska, Proof Systems for Logics Based on Non-deterministic Multiple-valued Structures, Logic Journal of the IGPL, 13:365-387, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Avron, A. and A. Zamansky, Quantification in Non-deterministic Multi-valued Structures, Proceedings of the 35th IEEE International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logics, 296–301, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Avron, A., J. Ben-Naim and B. Konikowska, Cut-free Ordinary Sequent Calculi for Logics Having Generalized Finite-Valued Semantics, Logica Universalis 1:41–69, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Avron, A., Non-deterministic semantics for logics with a consistency operator, Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 45:271–287, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Avron, A., Non-deterministic Semantics for Families of Paraconsistent Logics, Handbook of Paraconsistency, J.-Y. Beziau,W. Carnielli and D. Gabbay (eds.), 285-320, Studies in Logic 9, College Publications, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Avron, A. and A. Zamansky, Non-deterministic Multi-valued Matrices for First-order Logics of Formal Inconsistency, Proceedings of the 37th IEEE International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logics, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Avron, A. and A. Zamansky, Generalized Non-deterministic matrices and (n,k)-ary quantifiers, Proceedings of the Symposium on Logical Foundations of Computer Science, S. Artemov and A. Nerode (eds.), LNCS 4514, 26–40, Springer, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Avron, A. and A. Zamansky, Many-valued non-deterministic semantics for first-order Logics of Formal (In)consistency, Algebraic and Proof-theoretic Aspects of Non-classical Logics, S. Aguzzoli, A. Ciabattoni, B. Gerla, C. Manara, and V. Marra, (eds.), 1–24, LNAI 4460, Springer, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Avron, A., J. Ben-Naim, and B. Konikowska, Processing Information from a Set of Sources, Forthcoming in Towards Mathematical Philosophy, Trends in Logic series, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Avron, A. and A. Zamansky, Canonical calculi with (n,k)-ary quantifiers, Journal of Logical Methods in Computer Science, 10.2168/LMCS-4(3:2), 2008 (an extended version of [Zamansky and Avron, 2006c]).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zamansky, A. and A. Avron, Signed Calculi, Non-deterministic Matrices and Cut-elimination, Proceedings of the Symposium on Logical Foundations of Computer Science LNCS 5407, 31 – 46, Springer, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zamansky, A. and A. Avron, Signed Canonical Calculi with Quantifiers (an extended version of [Avron and Zamansky, 2009]), to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Avron, A., Tonk - a full mathematical solution, to appear in Ruth Manor’s Festschrift.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Baaz M., Kripke-Type Semantics for da Costa’s paraconsistent Logic Cω, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 27:523–527, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lopari´c A., A Semantical Study of some Propositional Calculi, The Journal of Non-Classical Logics, 3:73–95, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Baaz M., C.G. Fermüller, G. Salzer and R.Zach, Dual systems of sequents and tableaux for many-valued logics, Bull. EATCS, 51:192–197, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Baaz M. and C.G. Fermüller, Resolution-based theorem-proving for many-valued logics, Journal of Symbolic Computation, 19(4): 353–391, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Baaz M., C.G. Fermüller, G. Salzer and R .Zach, Labeled Calculi and Finite-valued Logics, Studia Logica, 61:7–33, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Baaz M., C. G. Fermüller, and G. Salzer, Automated Deduction for Many-valued Logics, Handbook of Automated Reasoning, A. Robinson and A. Voronkov (eds.), 1355–1400, Elsevier Science Publishers, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Baaz M., U. Egly and A. Leitsch, Normal Form Transformations, Handbook of Automated Reasoning, 273–333, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Batens D., K. de Clerq and N. Kurtonina, Embedding and inter- polation for some paralogics. The propositional case, Reports on Mathematical Logic 33:29–44, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Belnap N.D, Tonk, plonk and plink, Analysis, 22:130–134, 1962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Belnap N.D, A useful four-valued logic, Modern uses of multiple-valued logic, G. Epstein and J. M. Dunn, (eds.) Reidel, Dordrecht, NL, 5–37, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Béziau J.-Y., Classical negation can be expressed by one of its halves, Logic Journal of the Interest Group in Pure and Applied Logics, 7:145–151, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Blamey S., Partial Logic, Handbook of Philosophical Logic, D. Gabbay, F. Guenthner (eds.), 3:1–70, Reidel , Dordrecht, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bolc L. and P.Borowik, Many-Valued Logics 1. Theoretical Foundations, Springer, Berlin, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Borowik P., Multi-valued n-sequential propositional logic, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 52:309–310, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Carnielli W.A., Systematization of Finite Many-valued Logics through the method of Tableaux, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 52 (2):473–493, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Carnielli W.A., On sequents and tableaux for many-valued logics, Journal of non-classical logics, 8(1):59–76, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Carnielli W.A., Possible-translations semantics for paraconsistent logics, Frontiers in paraconsistent logic: Proceedings of the I World Congress on Paraconsistency, 159–72, Ghent, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Carnielli W.A. and J. Marcos, Limits of Paraconsistent Calculi, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 40:375–390, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Carnielli W.A, J. Marcos and S. de Amo, Formal inconsistency and evolutionary databases, Logic and logical philosophy, 8:115–152, Ghent, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Carnielli W.A., M.E. Coniglio and I.M.L. D’Ottaviano, Paraconsistency - the Logical Way to the Inconsistent, Lecture notes in pure and appliced mathematics, vol. 228, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  44. Carnielli W.A. and J. Marcos, A Taxonomy of C-systems, [Carnielli et. al., 2002], 1–94, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Carnielli W.A. and M.E. Coniglio,Splitting Logics, [Artemov et.al. (eds.), 2005], 389–414, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Carnielli W.A., M.E. Coniglio and J. Marcos, Logics of Formal Inconsistency, Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2nd Edition, D. Gabbay and F. Guenther (eds.), 14:15–107, Springer, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Church A., A formulation of the simple theory of types, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 5:56–68, 1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ciabattoni A. and Terui K., Towards a semantic characterization of cut elimination, Studia Logica, 82(1):95–119, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ciabattoni A. and Terui K., Modular cut-elimination: finding proofs or counter-examples, Proceedings of the 13-th International Conference of Logic for Programming AI and Reasoning (LPAR06), LNAI 4246, 135–149, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  50. da Costa N.C.A, On the theory of inconsistent formal systems, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 15:497–510, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Dunn J.M., Intuitive semantics for first-degree entailments and coupled trees, Philosophical Studies, 29:149–168, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Enderton H., A Mathematical Introduction to Logic, Academic Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Fitting M., Kleene’s Three-valued Logics and Their Children, Fundamenta Informaticae 20:113-131, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Gentzen, G., Investigations into Logical Deduction, The collected works of Gerhard Gentzen, M.E. Szabo, ed., 68–131, North Holland, Amsterdam , 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ginsberg M.L, Multivalued logics: A Uniform Approach to Reasoning in AI, Computer Intelligence, 4:256-316, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  56. J. Y. Girard, Linear logic, Theoretical Computer Science, 50:1–101, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Gottwald S., A Treatise on Many-Valued Logics, Studies in Logic and Computation, vol. 9, Research Studies Press, Baldock, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Hähnle, R., Automated Deduction in Multiple-valued Logics, Oxford University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Hähnle, R., Commodious Axiomatization of Quantifiers in Many-valued Logic, Studia Logica, 61:101–121, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Hähnle, R. Tableaux for Multiple-valued Logics, Handbook of Tableau Methods, M. D’Agostino, D. Gabbay, R. Hähnle and J. Posegga, (eds.), 529–580, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Hähnle, R., Advanced many-valued logics, Handbook of Philosophical Logic, D. Gabbay, F. Guenthner (eds.), 2nd Edition, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2:297–395, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Henkin, L., Some remarks on infinitely long formulas, Infinistic Methods, 167–183. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Hodges, W., Elementary Predicate Logic, Handbook of Philosophical Logic, D. Gabbay, F. Guenthner (eds.), 2nd Edition, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1:1–129, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Kalish, D. and R. Montague, Logic: Techniques of Formal Reasoning, NY: Harcourt, Brace&World, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Kleene, S.C, On a notation for ordinal numbers, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 3:150–155, 1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Konikowska B., Rasiowa-Sikorski Deduction Systems in Computer Science Applications, Theoretical Computer Science 286:323-266, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Leblanc H., Alternatives to Standard First-order Semantics, Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2:53–133, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Malinowski G., Many-Valued Logics, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  69. McCarthy, J., A basis for a mathematical theory of computation, Computer Programming and Formal Systems, P. Braffort and D. Hirshberg (eds.), 33–70, North Holland, Amsterdam , 1963.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  70. Mendelson E., Introduction to Mathematical Logic, Chapman and Hall, fourth edition, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Mostowski, A., Axiomatizability of some Many-valued Predicate Calculi, Fundamenta Mathematicae, , 15:165–190, North Holland, Amsterdam , 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Prior, A.N, The runabout inference ticket, Analysis, 21:38–9, 1960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Rabaey J.M., A. Chandrakasan and B. Nikolic , Digital Integrated Cicruits: A Design Perspective, Prentice-Hall, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Rasiowa H. and R. Sikorski, The Mathematics of Metamathematics, PWN (Polish Scientific Publishers), Warsaw 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Rosser J.B. and A.R. Turquette, Many-Valued Logics, North-Holland Publ. Comp., Amsterdam, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Rousseau G., Sequents in many-valued logic 1, Fundamenta Mathematicae, LX:23–33, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Salzer, G., Optimal axiomatizations for multiple-valued operators and quantifiers based on semilattices, Proceedings of 13-th CADE, Springer, M. McRobbie and J. Slaney (eds.), 1104:688–702, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Schroeder-Heister, P. Natural deduction calculi with rules of higher levels, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 50:275–276, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Shoenfield, J.R., Mathematical Logic, Association for Symbolic Logic, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Shoesmith D.J. and Smiley T.J, Deducibility and many-valuedness, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 36:610–622, 1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Sundholm, G., Proof Theory and Meaning, Handbook of Philosophical Logic, D. Gabbay, F. Guenthner (eds.), 2nd Edition, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 9:165–198, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Takahashi M., Many-valued logics of extended Gentzen style I, Sci. Rep. Tokio Kyoiku Daigaku Sec. A, 9(231):95–110, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Troelstra, A.S. and H. Schwichtenberg, Basic Proof Theory, Cambridge University Press, 126–130, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Urquhart A., Many-valued Logic, Handbook of Philosophical Logic, D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), 2nd Edition, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2:249–295, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  85. van Dalen D., Logic and Structure, Springer, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  86. von Kutschera F., Ein verallgemeinerter widerlegungsbegriff fur Gentzenkalkule, Archiv fur Mathematische Logik und Gurndlagenforschung, 12:104–118, 1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Wójcicki R., Theory of Logical Calculi: basic theory of consequence operations, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Zamansky, A. and A. Avron, Cut Elimination and Quantification in Canonical Systems, Studia Logica, 82(1):157–176, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Zamansky A. and A. Avron, Non-deterministic semantics for first-order paraconsistent logics, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, 431–440, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Zamansky, A. and A. Avron, Canonical Gentzen-type calculi with (n,k)-ary quantifiers , Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference in Automated Reasoning (IJCAR06), U. Furbach and N. Shankar (eds.), LNAI 4130, 251 – 265, Springer, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Zamansky, A. and A. Avron, Effective non-deterministic semantics for first-order LFIs, Journal of Multiple-valued Logic and Soft Computing (an extended version of [Avron and Zamansky, 2007a]), 13:4-6, 335 - 352, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Zucker, J.I., The adequacy problem for classical logic, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 7:517–535, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Zucker, J.I. and R.S. Tragesser, The adequacy problem for inferential logic, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 7:501–516, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnon Avron .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Avron, A., Zamansky, A. (2011). Non-Deterministic Semantics for Logical Systems. In: Gabbay, D., Guenthner, F. (eds) Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0479-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics