Skip to main content

Changing Sports/Media Complex and Its Impact on the Regulatory Process of the Broadcasting Sector

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Media and Sport

Part of the book series: ASSER International Sports Law Series ((ASSER))

  • 1428 Accesses

Abstract

Given that access to information seems unlimited in the digital landscape, some authors argue that broadcasting regulation is something from the past. According to them, spectrum scarcity and one-way selection of information at the level of broadcasters can no longer be upheld in the future as the premise for the regulation of the media sector. Moreover, they even proposed to leave the regulation of the broadcasting market to competition law. However, this should be nuanced, because the empowerment of the viewer and the change in behaviour is overestimated. Given that the replacement of old media by new media is not always followed immediately by the substitution of old media practices by new media habits, it would be too dangerous to conclude that the raison d’être of media regulation has disappeared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a detailed overview, see e.g. Castendyk et al. 2008, Valcke et al. 2010.

  2. 2.

    Hutchins and Rowe 2009, 356.

  3. 3.

    Szymanski 2006, 430.

  4. 4.

    Sportcal.com 2008.

  5. 5.

    Jakubowicz 2009, 17.

  6. 6.

    Standing Committee on Environment, Communications and the Arts 2009, 11.

  7. 7.

    Reding 2006.

  8. 8.

    Evens et al. 2010.

  9. 9.

    Mansell 1999, 156.

  10. 10.

    Levy 2001, 138.

  11. 11.

    Ungerer 2005a, 4.

  12. 12.

    Ungerer 2005b, 3.

  13. 13.

    Donders 2010.

  14. 14.

    Ariño2004a, 101.

  15. 15.

    Cowie and Marsden 1999, 56; Tambini 2001, 3.

  16. 16.

    Council of Europe 1999, Recommendation No. R (99) 1 on measures to promote media pluralism.

  17. 17.

    Dermot 1997, 603.

  18. 18.

    Donders and Evens 2010..

  19. 19.

    Cowie and Marsden 1999, 61; Helberger 2005, 45.

  20. 20.

    Mansell 1999, 63; Van Loon 2000, 298; Mansell 2004, 97.

  21. 21.

    See e.g.: Council of Europe 1999, Recommendation No. R (99) 1 on measures to promote media pluralism; Ariño 2004b, 157; Valcke 2004, 764.

  22. 22.

    ICRI et al. 2009a, 8.

  23. 23.

    Ariño 2007, 116.

  24. 24.

    OECD2007, 5–6 & 35.

  25. 25.

    Verhulst 2006, 333; Jakubowicz 2009, 13.

  26. 26.

    See e.g.: ICRI et al. 2009bb, 17.

  27. 27.

    Castells Castells 2009, 55 & 58.

  28. 28.

    ICRI et al. 2009a, 9; ICRI et al. 2009b, 11 & 14.

  29. 29.

    ICRI et al. 2009a, 9.

  30. 30.

    Verhulst 2007, 115 &121–122.

  31. 31.

    van Eijk 2006, 2.

  32. 32.

    Recital 22 of the AVMS Directive.

  33. 33.

    Lievens 2010, 78.

  34. 34.

    van Dijk 2006, 171–173; IDATE et al. 2008, 173.

  35. 35.

    Keen 2007, 15.

  36. 36.

    ICRI et. al. 2009b, 10.

  37. 37.

    Keen 2007, 15 & 17.

  38. 38.

    See e.g.: Chaffee and Metzger Chaffee and Metzger 2001, 365–379; Butler 2007, 4.

  39. 39.

    Visiongain 2008, 44.

  40. 40.

    de Dorlodot 2010.

  41. 41.

    See e.g.: ACT 2010, 4 & 14; Deloitte 2011.

  42. 42.

    Ofcom 2010a, para 4.9.

  43. 43.

    Gluck and Sales 2008, 46.

  44. 44.

    Woolard 2010.

  45. 45.

    Dejonghe 2010.

  46. 46.

    Laven 1998, 7.

  47. 47.

    Gluck and Sales 2008, 8; Deloitte 2011.

  48. 48.

    The Economist 2010; IP Network 2010.

  49. 49.

    Dejonghe 2010.

  50. 50.

    Gripsrud 2004, 216.

  51. 51.

    Tay and Turner 2010, 31.

  52. 52.

    Foster 2007, para 7.3.20.

  53. 53.

    Gluck and Sales 2008, 48, 112 & 115; Chunovic 2008, 2–3.

  54. 54.

    Ofcom 2010b, 102–103.

  55. 55.

    X 2004, 667; Boyle 2009, 5; Ofcom 2010b, 102–103.

  56. 56.

    Chelsea 2012.

  57. 57.

    Schuurman and De Marez 2010.

  58. 58.

    The Economist 2010.

  59. 59.

    Berte et al. 2010.

  60. 60.

    ACT 2009, 10.

  61. 61.

    Helberger 2008, 13.

  62. 62.

    ICRI et. al. 2009b, 17.

  63. 63.

    Helberger 2008, 3.

  64. 64.

    Iosifidis 2002, 39.

References

Legislation and Policy Documents: International: OECD

Council of Europe: Recommendations

  • Council of Europe (1999) Recommendation No. R (99) 1 on measures to promote media pluralism

    Google Scholar 

UK: Reports

Doctrine

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katrien Lefever .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 T.M.C. ASSER PRESS, The Hague, The Netherlands, and the author

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lefever, K. (2012). Changing Sports/Media Complex and Its Impact on the Regulatory Process of the Broadcasting Sector. In: New Media and Sport. ASSER International Sports Law Series. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-873-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships