Skip to main content

A3 Architecture Overviews

Harvesting Architectural Knowledge to Enhance Evolvability of Embedded Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Views on Evolvability of Embedded Systems

Part of the book series: Embedded Systems ((EMSY))

Abstract

Creating complex systems from scratch is time consuming and costly, therefore a development strategy often chosen by companies is to evolve existing systems. Reuse of existing knowledge and experience becomes essential to support the evolution process. Complex systems are usually the result of multidisciplinary teams, which means that an effective way to capture, organize and present this knowledge, in a fashion that can be used by different stakeholders is crucial. Typically, some of this knowledge is present in the form of text documents. However, much of that knowledge is usually hidden or lost, especially in long-lived systems. This leads to unexpected problems that could be prevented if the company reuses the knowledge it already has. An approach, based on the creation of A3 Architecture Overviews by an architecting method, is proposed to capture and share key architectural knowledge, enhancing communication and understanding among team members. We show that the proposed method to capture architectural knowledge provides an effective framework to support decision making when evolving complex systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is important to distinguish between levels of abstraction. Different parts of the life-cycle may need different levels of detail.

  2. 2.

    Model: An approximation, representation or idealization of selected aspects of the structure, behaviour, operation or characteristics of a real-world process, concept or system (IEEE 610.12-1990).

  3. 3.

    Visual models and pictures are, as they say, worth a thousand words each. Consequently, as the room to display information is limited, it is encouraged to use them also in the text summary.

  4. 4.

    The term ‘Function’ can be interpreted in many ways. We have used this term in the sense ‘a specific or discrete action that is necessary to achieve a given objective’ (Blanchard and Frabryky 1998).

  5. 5.

    For maintainability reasons, one person should be responsible for collecting all A3s and establish the links among them, as well as their hierarchy. However the creation of individual A3s and their update should be responsibility of A3 Architecture Overview authors.

References

  • Bass L, Clements PC, Kazman R (2003) Software architecture in practice. Addison-Wesley, Reading MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard BS, Frabryky WJ (1998) In: River US (ed) Systems engineering and analysis. Prentice-Hall, New Jersy

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnema GM, Borches PD (2008) Design with overview – how to survive in complex organizations. INCOSE 2008, ISBN: 9781605604473

    Google Scholar 

  • Borches PD, Bonnema GM (2008) ‘Living’ architecture overviews – supporting the design of evolutionary complex systems. CIRP Design Seminar, Enschede. http://www.opm.ctw.utwente.nl/cirpdesignconference2008/viewabstract.php?id=16

  • Borches PD, Bonnema GM (2009) Coping with system evolution – experiences in reverse architecting as a means to ease the evolution of complex systems. INCOSE 2009, ISBN: 9781615674398

    Google Scholar 

  • Chikofsky EJ, Cross JH II (1990) Reverse engineering and design recovery: a taxonomy. IEEE Softw 7(1):13–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW (1968) Challenge to reason. Sussex, Chichester/Wiley New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Domb E, Radeka K (2009) LAMDA and TRIZ: knowledge sharing across the enterprise. TRIZ J

    Google Scholar 

  • Galal-Edeen GH (2002) Reverse architecting: seeking the architectonic. 9th work conference on reverse engineering

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaac D, Mcconaughy G (1994) The role of architecture and evolvability development in accommodating change. INCOSE’94, pp 541–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Krikhaar RL (1997) Reverse architecting approach for complex systems. IEEE international conference on Softw maintenance

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCormack A, Rusnak J, Baldwin C (2008) The impact of component modularity on design evolution: evidence from the software industry. http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/5831.html. Accessed 1 May 2010

  • Mayrhauser A, Wang J, Li Q (1999) Experience with a reverse architecture approach to increase understanding. IEEE international conference on software maintenance

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller G (2006) How to create an architecture overview, Online document http://www.gaudisite.nl. Accessed 1 May 2010

  • Muller HA (1996) Understanding software systems using reverse engineering technologies research and practice. 18th ICSE

    Google Scholar 

  • Rechtin E, Maier RW (2000) The art of systems architecting. CRC, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ring J, Fricke E (1998) Rapid evolution of all your systems – problem or opportunity? IEEE 17th DASC

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw M (1989) Larger scale systems require higher-level abstractions. 5th international Work Softw Specif Des

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. American Philosophical Society

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobek II DK, Jimmerson C (2004) A3 reports: tool for process improvement. Industrial Engineering Res conference

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobek II DK, Jimmerson C (2005) A3 reports: tool for organizational transformation. Industrial engineering research conference

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner R (1998) Systems architecture and evolvability – definitions and perspective. INCOSE’98

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor SE, Fiske ST (1975) Point of view and perceptions of causality. J Pers Soc Psych 32(3):439–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zachman J (1987) A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems J 26:3

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was conducted in cooperation with the MRI group of Philips Healthcare. We thank all the experts from Philips Healthcare MRI for their support and contributions. We want to thank specially Phil van Liere for the time and effort dedicated to this project. We also want to thank the support of Gerrit Muller and other members of the Darwin project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Daniel Borches .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Borches, P.D. (2010). A3 Architecture Overviews. In: Van de Laar, P., Punter, T. (eds) Views on Evolvability of Embedded Systems. Embedded Systems. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9849-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9849-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9848-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9849-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics