Abstract
Factor analysis and hierarchical linear modeling are employed to examine Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2003 data (with updates from PISA 2006 and the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study, TIMSS 2007) regarding the effects on mathematics achievement in the United States of student-level variables including socioeconomic status (SES), gender, motivations, mathematics anxiety, self-related cognitions, and school-level variables including percentage of female students, number of mathematics activities, and student/mathematics teacher ratio. At the student level, SES, motivations, and self-related cognitions have positive relationships with students’ mathematics achievement, while mathematics anxiety is negatively associated with mathematics achievement. At the school level, percentage of female students, number of mathematics activities, and student/mathematics teacher ratio do not significantly influence average school mathematics achievement.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Braswell, J. S., Lutkis, A. D., Grigg, W. S., Santapau, S. L., Tay-Lim, B., & Johnson, M. (2001). The Nation’s report card: Mathematics 2000. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park: Sage.
Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park: Sage.
Campbell, J. R., Hombo, C. M., & Mazzeo, J. (2000). NAEP 1999 trends in academic progress: Three decades of student performance, NCES 2000. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Cooper, B., & Dunne, M. (2000). Assessing children’s mathematical knowledge: Social class, sex and problem-solving. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Ferguson, R. F. (1998). Can schools narrow the African American-white test score gap? In C. Jencks & M. Phillips (Eds.), The African American-white test score gap (pp. 318–374). Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
Hickey, D. T., Moore, A. L., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2001). The motivational and academic consequences of elementary mathematics environments: Do constructivist innovations and reforms make a difference? American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 611–652.
Lee, J. (2002). Racial and ethnic achievement gap trends: Reversing the progress toward equity? Educational Researcher, 31(1), 3–12.
Lee, V. E., & Bryk, A. S. (1989). A multilevel model of the social distribution of high school achievement. Sociology of Education, 62, 172–192.
Lubienski, S. T. (2001). A second look at mathematics achievement gaps: Intersections of race, class and gender in NAEP data. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Seattle (ERIC, document number ED454246).
Lubienski, S. T., & Bowen, A. (2000). Who’s counting? A survey of mathematics education research 1982–1998. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(5), 626–633.
Lubienski, S. T., & Shelley, M. C. (2003). A closer look at U.S. mathematics instruction and achievement: Examinations of race and SES in a decade of NAEP data. Paper presented at the 2003 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, April, 21–25.
Lubienski, S. T., Camburn, E., & Shelley, M. C. (2004). A closer look at mathematics instruction, achievement, and equity: Examinations of race and SES in 2000 main NAEP data. Ames: Iowa State University.
Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2006). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Newbury Park: Sage.
Newmann, F. M., Smith, B., Allensworth, E., & Bryk, A. S. (2001). Instructional program coherence: What it is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(4), 297–321.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Rothstein, R. (2004). Class and schools: Using social, economic, and educational reform to close the African American-white achievement gap. Washington: Economic Policy Institute.
Schafer, J. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman & Hall.
Schoenfeld, A. H (2002). Making mathematics work for all children: Issues of standards, testing, and equity. Educational Researcher, 31(1), 13–25.
Secada, W. G. (1992). Race, ethnicity, social class, language, and achievement in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 623–660). New York: Macmillan.
Shelley, M. C., & Lubienski, S. T. (2003). Mathematics instruction and student achievement: Multilevel models and social structures in NAEP 2000 data. Paper presented at the 2003 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, April 21-25.
Shelley, M. C., & Lubienski, S. T. (2005). Do NCTM reform practices matter? Predicting precollege student mathematics achievement using NAEP 2000 data. In 2004 American Statistical Association Proceedings (pp. 2363–2368). Alexandria: American Statistical Association.
Strutchens, M., Lubienski, S. T., McGraw, R., & Westbrook, S. K. (2004). NAEP findings regarding race/ethnicity: Students’ performance, school experiences, attitudes/beliefs and family influences. In P. Kloosterman & F. K. Lester, Jr. (Eds.), Results and interpretations of the 1990 through 2000 mathematics assessments of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (pp. 269–304). Reston: NCTM.
Weis, L. (Ed.). (1988). Class, race, and gender in American education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shelley, M.C., Su, W. (2010). Effects of Student-Level and School-Level Characteristics on the Quality and Equity of Mathematics Achievement in the United States: Using Factor Analysis and Hierarchical Linear Models to Inform Education Policy. In: Atweh, B., Graven, M., Secada, W., Valero, P. (eds) Mapping Equity and Quality in Mathematics Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9803-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9803-0_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9802-3
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9803-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)