Skip to main content

Effects of Student-Level and School-Level Characteristics on the Quality and Equity of Mathematics Achievement in the United States: Using Factor Analysis and Hierarchical Linear Models to Inform Education Policy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mapping Equity and Quality in Mathematics Education
  • 2467 Accesses

Abstract

Factor analysis and hierarchical linear modeling are employed to examine Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2003 data (with updates from PISA 2006 and the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study, TIMSS 2007) regarding the effects on mathematics achievement in the United States of student-level variables including socioeconomic status (SES), gender, motivations, mathematics anxiety, self-related cognitions, and school-level variables including percentage of female students, number of mathematics activities, and student/mathematics teacher ratio. At the student level, SES, motivations, and self-related cognitions have positive relationships with students’ mathematics achievement, while mathematics anxiety is negatively associated with mathematics achievement. At the school level, percentage of female students, number of mathematics activities, and student/mathematics teacher ratio do not significantly influence average school mathematics achievement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Braswell, J. S., Lutkis, A. D., Grigg, W. S., Santapau, S. L., Tay-Lim, B., & Johnson, M. (2001). The Nation’s report card: Mathematics 2000. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. R., Hombo, C. M., & Mazzeo, J. (2000). NAEP 1999 trends in academic progress: Three decades of student performance, NCES 2000. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, B., & Dunne, M. (2000). Assessing children’s mathematical knowledge: Social class, sex and problem-solving. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, R. F. (1998). Can schools narrow the African American-white test score gap? In C. Jencks & M. Phillips (Eds.), The African American-white test score gap (pp. 318–374). Washington: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, D. T., Moore, A. L., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2001). The motivational and academic consequences of elementary mathematics environments: Do constructivist innovations and reforms make a difference? American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 611–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. (2002). Racial and ethnic achievement gap trends: Reversing the progress toward equity? Educational Researcher, 31(1), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. E., & Bryk, A. S. (1989). A multilevel model of the social distribution of high school achievement. Sociology of Education, 62, 172–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubienski, S. T. (2001). A second look at mathematics achievement gaps: Intersections of race, class and gender in NAEP data. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Seattle (ERIC, document number ED454246).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubienski, S. T., & Bowen, A. (2000). Who’s counting? A survey of mathematics education research 1982–1998. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(5), 626–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubienski, S. T., & Shelley, M. C. (2003). A closer look at U.S. mathematics instruction and achievement: Examinations of race and SES in a decade of NAEP data. Paper presented at the 2003 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, April, 21–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubienski, S. T., Camburn, E., & Shelley, M. C. (2004). A closer look at mathematics instruction, achievement, and equity: Examinations of race and SES in 2000 main NAEP data. Ames: Iowa State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2006). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmann, F. M., Smith, B., Allensworth, E., & Bryk, A. S. (2001). Instructional program coherence: What it is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(4), 297–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, R. (2004). Class and schools: Using social, economic, and educational reform to close the African American-white achievement gap. Washington: Economic Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, J. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H (2002). Making mathematics work for all children: Issues of standards, testing, and equity. Educational Researcher, 31(1), 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secada, W. G. (1992). Race, ethnicity, social class, language, and achievement in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 623–660). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, M. C., & Lubienski, S. T. (2003). Mathematics instruction and student achievement: Multilevel models and social structures in NAEP 2000 data. Paper presented at the 2003 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, April 21-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, M. C., & Lubienski, S. T. (2005). Do NCTM reform practices matter? Predicting precollege student mathematics achievement using NAEP 2000 data. In 2004 American Statistical Association Proceedings (pp. 2363–2368). Alexandria: American Statistical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strutchens, M., Lubienski, S. T., McGraw, R., & Westbrook, S. K. (2004). NAEP findings regarding race/ethnicity: Students’ performance, school experiences, attitudes/beliefs and family influences. In P. Kloosterman & F. K. Lester, Jr. (Eds.), Results and interpretations of the 1990 through 2000 mathematics assessments of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (pp. 269–304). Reston: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weis, L. (Ed.). (1988). Class, race, and gender in American education. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mack C. Shelley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shelley, M.C., Su, W. (2010). Effects of Student-Level and School-Level Characteristics on the Quality and Equity of Mathematics Achievement in the United States: Using Factor Analysis and Hierarchical Linear Models to Inform Education Policy. In: Atweh, B., Graven, M., Secada, W., Valero, P. (eds) Mapping Equity and Quality in Mathematics Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9803-0_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics