Skip to main content

Top-Down Mechanism of Perception: A Scenario on the Role for Layer 1 and 2/3 Projections Viewed from Dynamical Systems Theory

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics (II)

Abstract

Cortical layer 1 is the main entrance of top-down signals from other higher cortices and subcortical nuclei. Recent findings challenge the view that top-down signals play just a modulatory role. However, how top-down signals are implemented to help reconstruct the internal representations of images, or an episode of events is poorly understood. Recent experimental data suggest that the “ongoing” brain state without external inputs into layer 4 and attentional top-down signals continually fluctuates among the intrinsic patterns of activity. Viewed from a dynamical systems standpoint, the transitory intrinsic states could be an expression of “attractor ruins”, observed in a mesoscopic dynamical system. We hypothesize that when top-down signals arrive as attention(s), contexts, or indices, the local brain state is temporarily stabilized to be an attractor(-like) state. In view of the anatomical and physiological configurations of neuronal systems in the superficial layers, we propose a hypothetical scenario for such non-classical dynamics in the brain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In “mental imagery”, no external stimuli play a role. When one is asked a question such as “which is longer – a donkey’s ears or an ear of corn?”, one may visualize the objects, and “see” the necessary properties, as most people report [4]. As Kosslyn pointed out, this sort of introspection suggests that visual mental images reconstruct the spatial geometry of objects [4].

  2. 2.

    The concept of attractor ruins may include a wider class of non-classical attractors than the Milnor attractor. By this reason, we may use the term “attractor ruins” in this paper to include possible but unknown classes of ruins.

  3. 3.

    “Attractor landscape” is usually used for potential systems. We may use the term here to mean the spatial structure of basins of attractors.

References

  1. Hubel, D.H.: Cortical neurobiology: a slanted historical perspective. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 5 (1982) 363–370.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Felleman, D.J., Van Essen, D.C.: Distributed hierarchical processing in primate cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex. 1 (1991) 1–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kenet, T., et al.: Spontaneously emerging cortical representations of visual attributes. Nature. 425 (2003) 954–956.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kosslyn, S.M.: Mental images and the brain. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 22 (2005) 333–347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thompson, K.G., et al.: Neural basis of covert attention in the frontal eye field. J. Neurosci. 25 (2005) 9479–9487.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ishai, A., et al.: Visual imagery of famous faces: effects of memory and attention revealed by fMRI. NeuroImage. 17 (2002) 1729–1741.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Golmayo, L., et al.: Electrophysiological evidence for the existence of a posterior cortical–prefrontal–basal forebrain circuitry in modulating sensory responses in visual and somatosensory rat cortical areas. Neuroscience. 119 (2003) 597–609.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsuda, I., Koerner, E., Shimizu, H.: Memory dynamiacs in asynchronous networks. Prog. Theor. Phys. 78 (1987) 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Milnor, J.: On the concept of attractor. Commun. Math. Phys. 99 (1985) 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tsuda, I.: Chaotic itinerancy as a dynamical basis of hermeneutics of brain and mind. World Futures. 32 (1991) 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fujii, H., et al.: Functional relevance of “excitatory” GABA actions in cortical interneurons: a dynamical systems approach. J. Integr. Neurosci. 3 (2004) 183–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nara, S., et al.: Chaotic memory dynamics in a reccurrent neural networks with cyclic memories embedded by pseudo-inverse method. Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos. 5 (1995) 1205–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Briggs, F., Callaway, E.M.: Layer-specific input to distinct cell types in layer 6 of monkey primary visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 21 (2001) 3600–3608.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cardin, J.A.: Driving fast-spiking cells induces γ-rhythm and controls sensory responses. Nature. 459 (2009) 663–668.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gulledge, A.T. et al.: Heterogeneity of phasic cholinergic signaling in neocortical neurons, J. Neurophysiol. 97 (2007) 2215–2229.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kruglikov, I., Rudy, B.: Perisomatic GABA release and thalamocortical integration onto neocortical excitatory cells are regulated by neuromodulators. Neuron. 58 (2008) 911–924; Online Supplement.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Adachi, K., Aihara, K.: Associative dynamics in chaotic neural network. Neural Netw. 10 (1997) 83–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tsuda, I.: Dynamic link of memories—chaotic memory map in non-equilibrium neural networks. Neural Netwo. 5 (1992) 313–3226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Teyler, T.J., et al.: The hippocampal indexing theory and episodic memory: updating the index. Hippocampus. 17 (2007) 1158–1169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bar, M.: A Cortical Mechanism for Triggering Top-down Facilitation in Visual Object Recognition. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 15 (2003) 600–609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuroiwa, J., et al.: Sensitive response of a chaotic wandering state to memory fragment inputs in a chaotic neural network model. Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos. 14 (2004) 1413–1421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Freeman, W.J.: Tutorial on neurobiology: from single neurons to brain chaos. Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos. 2 (1992) 451–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Christophe, E., et al.: Two types of nicotinic receptors mediate an excitation of neocortical layer I interneurons. J. Neurophysiol. 88 (2002) 1318–1327.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gabott, P.L.A., Hacon, S.J.: Local circuit neurons in the medial prefrontal cortex (Areas 24a,b,c, 25 and 32) in the Monkey: I. Cell Morphology and Morphometrics. J. Comp. Neurol. 364 (1996) 567–608.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sirota, A. et al.: Entrainment of neocortical neurons and gamma oscillations by the hippocampal theta rhythm. Neuron. 60 (2008) 683–697.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee, M.K.: Cholinergic basal forebrain neurons burst with thetaa during waking and paradoxical sleep. J. Neurosci. 25 (2005) 4365–4369.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author (HF) was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C), No. 19500259, from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of the Japanese Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroshi Fujii .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fujii, H., Aihara, K., Tsuda, I. (2011). Top-Down Mechanism of Perception: A Scenario on the Role for Layer 1 and 2/3 Projections Viewed from Dynamical Systems Theory. In: Wang, R., Gu, F. (eds) Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics (II). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9695-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics