Skip to main content

Fruit Flies as Models in Biomedical Research – A Drosophila Asthma Model

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Insect Biotechnology

Part of the book series: Biologically-Inspired Systems ((BISY,volume 2))

Abstract

Inflammatory diseases of the lung such as asthma and COPD show an increasing prevalence in western countries. Although these diseases are typically complex ones, they have an important genetic component. Genome-wide association studies have provided us with a comprehensive list of asthma susceptibility genes that will be extended substantially in the near future. To identify the role of these genes in the physiology and pathophysiology of the lung genetically tractable model organisms are indispensable. The inherent limitations of present models such as the mouse represent a constant urge for novel, complementary models. The fruit fly Drosophila has the potential to close this gap, as it might prove to be extremely helpful in the translation process from genetics to biological function. Except for those asthma susceptibility genes associated with adaptive immunity, we found unequivocal homologues for all of them in the fly genome. In addition, most of these candidates are indeed expressed in the airway epithelium and/or in other organs relevant for asthma, namely the blood cells and the brain. A majority of them are regulated upon airway infection in the Drosophila airway epithelium pointing to an important role in airway immunity and development of asthma-like phenotypes in the fly. These surprising similarities at the molecular level, in combination with the unmatched technical possibilities available to researchers using Drosophila should complement murine models in various aspects of asthma research. Biomedical research critically depends on animal models to understand the molecular basis underlying the pathogenesis of human diseases and to provide systems for developing and testing new therapies. Despite the supremacy of murine models, other model organisms are able to provide new and relevant information. All these organisms, including mice, are characterized by a set of features allowing us to categorize them as real model organisms. In addition to the sequenced genomes, the short life cycles, and the similarities with human genes/proteins, the ease of genetic manipulation is of prime importance. Among the limited number of well established and generally accepted model organisms (yeast, C. elegans, Drosophila, zebra fish, and mice), the fruit fly Drosophila is the only insect. It is the oldest model organism and was introduced almost a century ago by Thomas Hunt Morgan. Sequencing and analysis of its genome revealed a completely unforeseen degree of similarities with our own genome. More than 60% of all human disease genes have homologous counterparts in the fly (Fortini et al., 2000), which led to the development of a special database listing all these candidate genes (Chien et al., 2002). Among the first studies that utilized Drosophila with the goal to learn more about the molecular events underlying these diseases are those that established corresponding models for neurodegenerative diseases (Feany and Bender, 2000). In addition to this Parkinson model, very informative models of Huntington’s and Alzheimer’s disease have been established (Chan and Bonini, 2000), which triggered a great number of follow-up studies. In the last years, various different Drosophila disease models have been introduced (Bier, 2005). Only two out of a plethora of corresponding studies should be mentioned, i.e. models for the analysis of cardiac diseases (Wolf et al., 2006) and diabetes (Baker and Thummel, 2007). For the unprejudiced reader it may be hard to understand why Drosophila should be that well suited. The fruit fly is central to all model organisms; its organization is much simpler than in mice. Drosophila is simple enough to function as an easy to use model, but major organs, physiological processes, and behaviors are very similar to those found in men. This is of special importance, because it makes comparisons between men and flies much easier than comparisons between men and worms or even between men and yeast. The major question is what makes Drosophila so special? It is a combination of a vast amount of knowledge that has been accumulated during the last century and the availability of countless technical opportunities to manipulate the fly that are beyond comparison.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Affolter M, Bellusci S, Itoh N, Shilo B, Thiery JP, Werb Z (2003) Tube or not tube: remodeling epithelial tissues by branching morphogenesis. Dev Cell 4(1):11–18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arbouzova NI, Zeidler MP (2006) JAK/STAT signalling in Drosophila: insights into conserved regulatory and cellular functions. Development 133(14):2605–2616

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baker KD, Thummel CS (2007) Diabetic larvae and obese flies-emerging studies of metabolism in Drosophila. Cell Metab 6(4):257–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bellen HJ, Levis RW, Liao G, He Y, Carlson JW, Tsang G, Evans-Holm M, Hiesinger PR, Schulze KL, Rubin GM, Hoskins RA, Spradling AC (2004) The BDGP gene disruption project: single transposon insertions associated with 40% of Drosophila genes. Genetics 167(2):761–781

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bier E (2005) Drosophila, the golden bug, emerges as a tool for human genetics. Nat Rev Genet 6(1):9–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brand AH, Perrimon N (1993) Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118(2):401–415

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Broide DH, Lawrence T, Doherty T, Cho JY, Miller M, McElwain K, McElwain S, Karin M (2005) Allergen-induced peribronchial fibrosis and mucus production mediated by IkappaB kinase beta-dependent genes in airway epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102(49):17723–17728

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chan HY, Bonini NM (2000) Drosophila models of human neurodegenerative disease. Cell Death Differ 7(11):1075–1080

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chien S, Reiter LT, Bier E, Gribskov M (2002) Homophila: human disease gene cognates in Drosophila. Nucleic Acids Res 30(1):149–151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dietzl G, Chen D, Schnorrer F, Su KC, Barinova Y, Fellner M, Gasser B, Kinsey K, Oppel S, Scheiblauer S, Couto A, Marra V, Keleman K, Dickson BJ (2007) A genome-wide transgenic RNAi library for conditional gene inactivation in Drosophila. Nature 448(7150):151–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feany MB, Bender WW (2000) A Drosophila model of Parkinson’s disease. Nature 404(6776):394–398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrandon D, Jung AC, Criqui M, Lemaitre B, Uttenweiler-Joseph S, Michaut L, Reichhart J, Hoffmann JA (1998) A drosomycin-GFP reporter transgene reveals a local immune response in Drosophila that is not dependent on the Toll pathway. EMBO J 17(5):1217–1227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelman FD, Wills-Karp M (2008) Usefulness and optimization of mouse models of allergic airway disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol 121(3):603–606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fortini ME, Skupski MP, Boguski MS, Hariharan IK (2000) A survey of human disease gene counterparts in the Drosophila genome. J Cell Biol 150(2):F23–F30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghabrial A, Luschnig S, Metzstein MM, Krasnow MA (2003) Branching morphogenesis of the Drosophila tracheal system. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 19:623–647

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami S, Angkasekwinai P, Shan M, Greenlee KJ, Barranco WT, Polikepahad S, Seryshev A, Song LZ, Redding D, Singh B, Sur S, Woodruff P, Dong C, Corry DB, Kheradmand F (2009) Divergent functions for airway epithelial matrix metalloproteinase 7 and retinoic acid in experimental asthma. Nat Immunol 10(5):496–503

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hammad H, Chieppa M, Perros F, Willart MA, Germain RN, Lambrecht BN (2009) House dust mite allergen induces asthma via Toll-like receptor 4 triggering of airway structural cells. Nat Med 15(4):410–416

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holgate ST (2007) The epithelium takes centre stage in asthma and atopic dermatitis. Trends Immunol 28(6):248–251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holgate ST, Polosa R (2008) Treatment strategies for allergy and asthma. Nat Rev Immunol 8(3):218–230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway JW, Yang IA, Holgate ST (2008) Interpatient variability in rates of asthma progression: can genetics provide an answer? J Allergy Clin Immunol 121(3):573–579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lemaitre B, Hoffmann J (2007) The host defense of Drosophila melanogaster. Annu Rev Immunol 25:697–743

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lemaitre B, Nicolas E, Michaut L, Reichhart JM, Hoffmann JA (1996) The dorsoventral regulatory gene cassette spatzle/Toll/cactus controls the potent antifungal response in Drosophila adults. Cell 86(6):973–983

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire SE, Le PT, Osborn AJ, Matsumoto K, Davis RL (2003) Spatiotemporal rescue of memory dysfunction in Drosophila. Science 302(5651):1765–1768

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Page-McCaw A, Serano J, Sante JM, Rubin GM (2003) Drosophila matrix metalloproteinases are required for tissue remodeling, but not embryonic development. Dev Cell 4(1):95–106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pantano C, Ather JL, Alcorn JF, Poynter ME, Brown AL, Guala AS, Beuschel SL, Allen GB, Whittaker LA, Bevelander M, Irvin CG, Janssen-Heininger YM (2008) Nuclear factor-kappaB activation in airway epithelium induces inflammation and hyperresponsiveness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 177(9):959–969

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roeder T, Isermann K, Kabesch M (2009) Drosophila in asthma research. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 179(11):979–983

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruehle H (1932) Das larvale Tracheensystem von Drosophila melanogaster Meigen und seine Variabilität. Z Wiss Zool 141:159–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuai K, Liu B (2003) Regulation of JAK-STAT signalling in the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 3(11):900–911

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tang H, Kambris Z, Lemaitre B, Hashimoto C (2008) A serpin that regulates immune melanization in the respiratory system of Drosophila. Dev Cell 15(4):617–626

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tzou P, Ohresser S, Ferrandon D, Capovilla M, Reichhart JM, Lemaitre B, Hoffmann JA, Imler JL (2000) Tissue-specific inducible expression of antimicrobial peptide genes in Drosophila surface epithelia. Immunity 13(5):737–748

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Venken KJ, Bellen HJ (2007) Transgenesis upgrades for Drosophila melanogaster. Development 134(20):3571–3584

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Venken KJ, Carlson JW, Schulze KL, Pan H, He Y, Spokony R, Wan KH, Koriabine M, de Jong PJ, White KP, Bellen HJ, Hoskins RA (2009) Versatile P[acman] BAC libraries for transgenesis studies in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Methods 6(6):431–434

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vercelli D (2008) Discovering susceptibility genes for asthma and allergy. Nat Rev Immunol 8(3):169–182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner C, Isermann K, Fehrenbach H, Roeder T (2008) Molecular architecture of the fruit fly’s airway epithelial immune system. BMC Genomics 9:446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner C, Isermann K, Roeder T (2009) Infection induces a survival program and local remodeling in the airway epithelium of the fly. FASEB J 23(7):2045–2054

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whitten J (1957) The post-embryonic development of the tracheal system in Drosophila melanogaster. Q J Microsc Sci 98:123–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf MJ, Amrein H, Izatt JA, Choma MA, Reedy MC, Rockman HA (2006) Drosophila as a model for the identification of genes causing adult human heart disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(5):1394–1399

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research in our group was sponsored by the German Research Foundation (DFG) as parts of the SFB Transregio-22 (Teilprojekt A7) and the Cluster Inflammation@ interfaces.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Roeder .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roeder, T., Isermann, K., Wagner, C., Warmbold, C. (2011). Fruit Flies as Models in Biomedical Research – A Drosophila Asthma Model. In: Vilcinskas, A. (eds) Insect Biotechnology. Biologically-Inspired Systems, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9641-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics