Skip to main content

Innovation, Growth, and Inequality: Plausible Scenarios of Wage Disparities in a World with Nanotechnologies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nanotechnology and the Challenges of Equity, Equality and Development

Part of the book series: Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society ((YNTS,volume 2))

  • 810 Accesses

Abstract

Walter Valdivia provides another economic analysis of the patterns nanotechnology is weaving. Although much growth theory neglects distributional issues, one version considers the income dynamics connected to the diffusion of a new general purpose technology (GPT). A GPT is a technology that causes widespread change because it radically affects the productivity of many other technologies. Because nanotechnology research is so pervasive in the sciences and engineering, many observers are working with the assumption that it will be as important a GPT as computing technology. Using a model proposed by Philippe Aghion to explain the relationship between skill and the diffusion of a GPT, Valdivia analyzes ways wage inequality might appear in several possible paths for the development of nanotechnologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acemoglu, Daron. 1998. Why do new technologies complement skills? Directed technical change and wage inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics CXIII: 1055–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, Daron. 2002. Technical change, inequality, and the labor market. Journal of Economic Literature 40: 7–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, Philippe. 2002. Schumpeterian growth theory and the dynamics of income inequality. Econometrica 70: 855–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, Philippe, Eve Caroli, and Cecilia Garcia-Peñalosa. 1999. Inequality and economic growth: The perspective of the new growth theories. Journal of Economic Literature 37: 1615–1660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, Philippe, and Peter Howitt. 1992. A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60: 323–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, Philippe, and Peter Howitt. 2006. Joseph Schumpeter Lecture, appropriate growth policy: A unifying framework. Journal of the European Economic Association 4: 269–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barben, Daniel, Erik Fisher, Cynthia Selin, and David H. Guston. 2008. Anticipatory governance of nanotechnology: Foresight, engagement, and integration. In The handbook of science and technology studies, 3rd ed., ed. Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch, and Judy Wajcman. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, Larry M. 2008. Unequal democracy: The political economy of the new Gilded Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan, Timothy F., and Manuel Trajtenberg. 1992. General purpose technologies: Engines of growth? NBER working paper 4148. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan, Timothy F., and Manuel Trajtenberg. 1995. General purpose technologies: engines of growth? Journal of Econometrics 65: 83–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boin, Arjen, and Paul ‘t Hart. 2003. Public leadership in times of crisis: Mission impossible? Public Administration Review 63: 544–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, Paul A. 1989. Computer and dynamo: The modern productivity paradox in a not-too-distant mirror. Center for Economic Policy Research, No. 172. Palo Alto: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, Paul A. 1990. The dynamo and the computer: An historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox. American Economic Review 80: 355–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, Paul A., and Gavin Wright. 1999. General purpose technologies and surges in productivity: Historical reflections on the future of the ICT revolution. Discussion papers in economic and social history. Oxford: University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, Peter. 1954. The practice of management. New York, NY: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, Marvin. 1962. The production function in allocation and growth: A synthesis. American Economic Review 52: 995–1022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Richard B. 1991. How much has de-unionisation contributed to the rise in male earnings inequality? NBER working paper 3826. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, Gene M. and Elhanan Helpman. 1991. Innovation and growth in the global economy. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossmann, Volker. 2001. Inequality, economic growth, and technological change: New aspects in an old debate. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guston, David H., and Daniel Sarewitz. 2002. Real-time technology assessment. Technology in Society 24: 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Charles I. 1995. R&D-based models of economic growth. The Journal of Political Economy 103: 759–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Bronwyn H., Adam B. Jaffe, and Manuel Trajtenberg. 2001. The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER working paper 8498. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, John R. 1937. Mr. Keynes and the “classics”: A suggested interpretation. Econometrica 5: 147–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Charles I. 1995. R&D-based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy 103: 759–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karinen, Risto, and David H. Guston. 2009. Toward anticipatory governance; The experience with nanotechnology. In Governing future technologies: Nanotechnology and the rise of an assessment regime, ed. Mario Kaiser, Monika Kurath, Sabine Maasen, and Cristoph Rehmann-Sutter, 217–232. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, Richard G., Cliff Bekar, and Kenneth Carlaw. 1998. What requires explanation? In General purpose technologies and economic growth, ed. Elhanan Helpman, 15–54. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lux Research, Inc. 2007. The nanotech report™. Investment overview and market research for nanotechnology, 5th ed. New York, NY: Lux Research Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, Paul, and John Roberts. 1990. The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization. The American Economic Review 80: 511–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani, Franco. 1944. Liquidity preference and the theory of interest and money. Econometrica 12: 45–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr, Joel. 1990. The lever of riches: Technological creativity and economic progress. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard R. 2005. Technology, institutions, and economic growth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard R., and Edmund S. Phelps. 1966. Investments in humans, technological diffusion, and economic growth. American Economic Review 56: 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmberg, Christopher, and Tuomo Nikulainen. 2006. Industrial renewal and growth through nanotechnology? An overview with focus on Finland. ETLA discussion paper 1020. Helsinki: ETLA Elinkeinoelämän Tutkimuslaitos, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parente, Stephen L. 2001. The failure of endogenous growth. Knowledge, Technology and Policy 13: 49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Nancy C., and Linda Wargo. 1994. The dilemma of planning in large scale public organizations: The case of the United States Navy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 4: 469–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, Paul. 1986. Increasing returns and long-run growth. The Journal of Political Economy 94: 1002–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, Paul. 1990. Endogenous technological change. The Journal of Political Economy, Part 2: The Problem of Development: A conference of the Institute for the Free Enterprise Systems 98: S71–S102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Nathan. 1998. Chemical Engineering as a general purpose technology. In General purpose technologies and economic growth, ed. Elhanan Helpman, 15–54. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Sherwin. 1981. The economics of superstarts. The American Economic Review 71: 845–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruttan, Vernon W. 2006. Is war necessary for economic growth? Military procurement and technology development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Paul, Gilles. 2008. Innovation and inequality: How does technical progress affects workers? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, Paul A. 1947. Foundations of economic analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1942. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York, NY: Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, Christine M. 2005. Future management research directions in nanotechnology: A case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 22: 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert A. 1987. The steam engine and the computer: What makes technology revolutionary. EDUCOM Bulletin 22: 2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smits, Ruud, Rutgerg van Merkerk, David H. Guston, and Daniel Sarewitz. 2009. Strategic intelligence; The role of TA in systemic innovation policy. Utrecht University, Innovation Studies Utrecht, Working Paper 08.01. http://www.geo.uu.nl/isu/pdf/isu0801.pdf. (accessed November 1, 2009).

  • Solow, Robert M. 1956. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 70: 65–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verspagen, Bart. 2005. Innovation and economic growth. In The Oxford handbook of innovation, ed. Jan Fagerberg, David Mowery, and Richard R. Nelson, 487–513. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youtie, Jan, Maurizio Iacopetta, and Stuart Graham. 2008. Assessing the nature of nanotechnology: Can we uncover an emerging general purpose technology? Journal of Technology Transfer 33: 315–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, Rae. 1985. The relationship of emergency management to governmental policies on man-made technological disasters. Public Administration Review 45: 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walter D. Valdivia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Valdivia, W.D. (2010). Innovation, Growth, and Inequality: Plausible Scenarios of Wage Disparities in a World with Nanotechnologies. In: Cozzens, S., Wetmore, J. (eds) Nanotechnology and the Challenges of Equity, Equality and Development. Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9615-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics