Abstract
Walter Valdivia provides another economic analysis of the patterns nanotechnology is weaving. Although much growth theory neglects distributional issues, one version considers the income dynamics connected to the diffusion of a new general purpose technology (GPT). A GPT is a technology that causes widespread change because it radically affects the productivity of many other technologies. Because nanotechnology research is so pervasive in the sciences and engineering, many observers are working with the assumption that it will be as important a GPT as computing technology. Using a model proposed by Philippe Aghion to explain the relationship between skill and the diffusion of a GPT, Valdivia analyzes ways wage inequality might appear in several possible paths for the development of nanotechnologies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acemoglu, Daron. 1998. Why do new technologies complement skills? Directed technical change and wage inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics CXIII: 1055–1090.
Acemoglu, Daron. 2002. Technical change, inequality, and the labor market. Journal of Economic Literature 40: 7–72.
Aghion, Philippe. 2002. Schumpeterian growth theory and the dynamics of income inequality. Econometrica 70: 855–882.
Aghion, Philippe, Eve Caroli, and Cecilia Garcia-Peñalosa. 1999. Inequality and economic growth: The perspective of the new growth theories. Journal of Economic Literature 37: 1615–1660.
Aghion, Philippe, and Peter Howitt. 1992. A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60: 323–351.
Aghion, Philippe, and Peter Howitt. 2006. Joseph Schumpeter Lecture, appropriate growth policy: A unifying framework. Journal of the European Economic Association 4: 269–314.
Barben, Daniel, Erik Fisher, Cynthia Selin, and David H. Guston. 2008. Anticipatory governance of nanotechnology: Foresight, engagement, and integration. In The handbook of science and technology studies, 3rd ed., ed. Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch, and Judy Wajcman. Cambridge: MIT.
Bartels, Larry M. 2008. Unequal democracy: The political economy of the new Gilded Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bresnahan, Timothy F., and Manuel Trajtenberg. 1992. General purpose technologies: Engines of growth? NBER working paper 4148. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Bresnahan, Timothy F., and Manuel Trajtenberg. 1995. General purpose technologies: engines of growth? Journal of Econometrics 65: 83–108.
Boin, Arjen, and Paul ‘t Hart. 2003. Public leadership in times of crisis: Mission impossible? Public Administration Review 63: 544–553.
David, Paul A. 1989. Computer and dynamo: The modern productivity paradox in a not-too-distant mirror. Center for Economic Policy Research, No. 172. Palo Alto: Stanford University.
David, Paul A. 1990. The dynamo and the computer: An historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox. American Economic Review 80: 355–361.
David, Paul A., and Gavin Wright. 1999. General purpose technologies and surges in productivity: Historical reflections on the future of the ICT revolution. Discussion papers in economic and social history. Oxford: University of Oxford.
Drucker, Peter. 1954. The practice of management. New York, NY: Harper.
Frankel, Marvin. 1962. The production function in allocation and growth: A synthesis. American Economic Review 52: 995–1022.
Freeman, Richard B. 1991. How much has de-unionisation contributed to the rise in male earnings inequality? NBER working paper 3826. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Grossman, Gene M. and Elhanan Helpman. 1991. Innovation and growth in the global economy. Cambridge: MIT.
Grossmann, Volker. 2001. Inequality, economic growth, and technological change: New aspects in an old debate. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
Guston, David H., and Daniel Sarewitz. 2002. Real-time technology assessment. Technology in Society 24: 93–109.
Jones, Charles I. 1995. R&D-based models of economic growth. The Journal of Political Economy 103: 759–784.
Hall, Bronwyn H., Adam B. Jaffe, and Manuel Trajtenberg. 2001. The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER working paper 8498. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Hicks, John R. 1937. Mr. Keynes and the “classics”: A suggested interpretation. Econometrica 5: 147–159.
Jones, Charles I. 1995. R&D-based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy 103: 759–784.
Karinen, Risto, and David H. Guston. 2009. Toward anticipatory governance; The experience with nanotechnology. In Governing future technologies: Nanotechnology and the rise of an assessment regime, ed. Mario Kaiser, Monika Kurath, Sabine Maasen, and Cristoph Rehmann-Sutter, 217–232. Dordrecht: Springer.
Lipsey, Richard G., Cliff Bekar, and Kenneth Carlaw. 1998. What requires explanation? In General purpose technologies and economic growth, ed. Elhanan Helpman, 15–54. Cambridge: MIT.
Lux Research, Inc. 2007. The nanotech report™. Investment overview and market research for nanotechnology, 5th ed. New York, NY: Lux Research Inc.
Milgrom, Paul, and John Roberts. 1990. The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization. The American Economic Review 80: 511–528.
Modigliani, Franco. 1944. Liquidity preference and the theory of interest and money. Econometrica 12: 45–88.
Mokyr, Joel. 1990. The lever of riches: Technological creativity and economic progress. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Nelson, Richard R. 2005. Technology, institutions, and economic growth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Nelson, Richard R., and Edmund S. Phelps. 1966. Investments in humans, technological diffusion, and economic growth. American Economic Review 56: 69–75.
Palmberg, Christopher, and Tuomo Nikulainen. 2006. Industrial renewal and growth through nanotechnology? An overview with focus on Finland. ETLA discussion paper 1020. Helsinki: ETLA Elinkeinoelämän Tutkimuslaitos, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
Parente, Stephen L. 2001. The failure of endogenous growth. Knowledge, Technology and Policy 13: 49–58.
Roberts, Nancy C., and Linda Wargo. 1994. The dilemma of planning in large scale public organizations: The case of the United States Navy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 4: 469–491.
Romer, Paul. 1986. Increasing returns and long-run growth. The Journal of Political Economy 94: 1002–1037.
Romer, Paul. 1990. Endogenous technological change. The Journal of Political Economy, Part 2: The Problem of Development: A conference of the Institute for the Free Enterprise Systems 98: S71–S102.
Rosenberg, Nathan. 1998. Chemical Engineering as a general purpose technology. In General purpose technologies and economic growth, ed. Elhanan Helpman, 15–54. Cambridge: MIT.
Rosen, Sherwin. 1981. The economics of superstarts. The American Economic Review 71: 845–858.
Ruttan, Vernon W. 2006. Is war necessary for economic growth? Military procurement and technology development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Saint-Paul, Gilles. 2008. Innovation and inequality: How does technical progress affects workers? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Samuelson, Paul A. 1947. Foundations of economic analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1942. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York, NY: Harper and Brothers.
Shea, Christine M. 2005. Future management research directions in nanotechnology: A case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 22: 185–200.
Simon, Herbert A. 1987. The steam engine and the computer: What makes technology revolutionary. EDUCOM Bulletin 22: 2–5.
Smits, Ruud, Rutgerg van Merkerk, David H. Guston, and Daniel Sarewitz. 2009. Strategic intelligence; The role of TA in systemic innovation policy. Utrecht University, Innovation Studies Utrecht, Working Paper 08.01. http://www.geo.uu.nl/isu/pdf/isu0801.pdf. (accessed November 1, 2009).
Solow, Robert M. 1956. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 70: 65–94.
Verspagen, Bart. 2005. Innovation and economic growth. In The Oxford handbook of innovation, ed. Jan Fagerberg, David Mowery, and Richard R. Nelson, 487–513. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Youtie, Jan, Maurizio Iacopetta, and Stuart Graham. 2008. Assessing the nature of nanotechnology: Can we uncover an emerging general purpose technology? Journal of Technology Transfer 33: 315–329.
Zimmerman, Rae. 1985. The relationship of emergency management to governmental policies on man-made technological disasters. Public Administration Review 45: 29–39.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Valdivia, W.D. (2010). Innovation, Growth, and Inequality: Plausible Scenarios of Wage Disparities in a World with Nanotechnologies. In: Cozzens, S., Wetmore, J. (eds) Nanotechnology and the Challenges of Equity, Equality and Development. Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9615-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9615-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9614-2
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9615-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)