Skip to main content

Towards a Caring Economy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Applying Care Ethics to Business

Part of the book series: Issues in Business Ethics ((IBET,volume 34))

Abstract

The predominant economic theory in the United States and most of the developed world emphasizes competitive relations among individuals or institutions. These relations are often justified by traditional moral concepts such as justice, equality, rights, etc. The ethics of care, on the other hand, emphasizes personal relationships among individuals in their communities and takes interdependence as a necessary condition for achieving individual interests. Prima facie, the ethics of care seems to be, at best, irrelevant and, at worse, inconsistent with this economic theory. I argue that the claim that the ethics of care is irrelevant is misguided. The claim that it is inconsistent with the predominant economic theory, on the other hand, seems correct. This, however, need not be viewed as a flaw of the ethics of care since, I contend, it is more plausibly construed as a flaw of the predominant economic system. The ethics of care is relevant to economic theory in two ways. Firstly, it is relevant in settling disputes within the preferred economic theory. The ethics of care places primary importance on the interests of the individuals who are affected the most by such arrangements. Secondly, it is relevant in evaluating competing economic theories. The ethics of care can ensure that an economic theory creates a system that will positively affect the individuals and their societies by assigning primary roles to them. The relevancy of the ethics of care further suggests that any inconsistency between it and an economic system should count against the economic system. An economic theory, if it is to be justified, must be conducive to the welfare of the individuals in their communities. The ethics of care can help us determine whether an economic theory can be justified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The terms “corporate” or “corporations” are intended to have a wide scope as to include any private or state owned company.

  2. 2.

    Slote (1998) views the ethics of care as an agent-based virtue ethics of caring. Held (2006) argues that Slote “misses the centrality of caring relations for an ethics of care” (p. 51). A caring person, according to her, not only needs to have the intention to care and the disposition to care effectively but must also participate in caring relations. Although I agree with Held, whether the ethics of care is an independent moral theory or a version of virtue ethics is not pertinent to my argument.

  3. 3.

    See Rousseau (1986).

  4. 4.

    Smith’s claim is not a metaphor but a metaphysical assumption, specifically a Providential conception of human affairs. See Denis (2005) and Nicholls (1992).

  5. 5.

    The results were presented at the American Association for the Advancement of Science meeting in Boston.

  6. 6.

    See Cookson (2008).

  7. 7.

    The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) reports that global cancer rates are expected to increase by 50% to 15 million in the year 2020. (Press Release No 145 in April 3, 2003.)

  8. 8.

    The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission Report published in January 2011 paints a similar story.

  9. 9.

    This explanation is nevertheless incorrect since it ignores that the financial sector was aware that the were selling “bundles” of and selling insolvent loans. For a comprehensive analysis see Baruchello (2011).

  10. 10.

    Natural Law Theory provides justification for the former while Kantian Ethics provides justification for the latter.

  11. 11.

    Held (1993) believes that the ethics of care is only applicable to the private realm and proposes to combine it with the ethics of justice, which she views as applicable to the public realm. Gelfand (2004), on the other hand, argues that justice can be conceived as a part of caring. Slote (1998) makes a similar argument.

  12. 12.

    McMurtry’s value theory offers a compelling criterion to determine real needs. See McMurtry (2005).

  13. 13.

    For other alternatives to capitalism see Nürnberger 1998; for limits of market organizations see Nelson 2005; for an exposition on various economic systems see Gary and Joyce Pickersgill 1974.

  14. 14.

    Held argues that neo-liberalism ignores these relations.

  15. 15.

    Decisions made by individuals who interact with one another through or in markets often have negative effects on individuals outside the market. Economists use the term “externalities” to refer to such costs. Air or water pollution is an example of an externality (Wolff and Resnick 1987). It is worth noting that corporations can pass such costs to others without violating Friedman’s provisions since externalities need not arise from either deception or fraud.

  16. 16.

    Noam Chomsky provides this analogy in the documentary “The Corporation”, which is based on the book by Joel Bakan (2004).

  17. 17.

    See Shaw 2011: 230.

  18. 18.

    Since executives virtually determine their own pay by appointing the board of trustees, they are not on a par with an average worker.

  19. 19.

    I am grateful to Giorgio Baruchello, Douglas Woods, and an anonymous referee for helpful comments.

References

  • Baier, Annette C. 1994. The need for more than justice. In Moral prejudices: Essays on ethics, 18–32. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakan, Joel. 2004. The corporation: The pathological pursuit of profit and power. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baruchello, Giorgio. 2008. Capitalism and freedom: The core of a contradiction—an essay on Cornelius Castoriadis and John McMurtry. Nordicum-mediterraneum: Icelandic e-journal of nordic and mediterranean studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baruchello, Giorgio. 2011. Your money or your life John McMurtry and Martha Nussbaum on the for-profit assault upon life-capabilities. Journal of Philosophy of Life 1 (1): 13–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Yoram, and Elaina Rose. 2009. Why are economics students more selfish than the rest? In Department of Economics, University of Washington, WA. Working Papers Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, John B. Jr. 2007. Towards a just and sustainable economic order. In Environmental ethics: An anthology, ed. Light Andrew, and Holmes Rolston III, 359–370. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cookson, Clive. 2008. Poverty mars formation of infant brains. Financial Times, February 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copp, David. 2006. The oxford handbook of ethical theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, Mary. 2002. Care as good for social Policy. Journal of Social Policy 31 (2): 251–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, Herman E. 2005. “Economics in a full world. Scientific American 293 (3): 100–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, Herman E., and Townsend Kenneth N. 1993. Valuing the earth: Economics, ecology, ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, A. 2005. The invisible hand of god in Adam Smith. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 23 (1): 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duska, Ronald F. 2006. Contemporary reflections on business ethics. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Nancy, and Linda Gordon. 2006. “Dependency” demystified: Inscriptions of power in a keyword of the welfare state. In Contemporary political philosophy: An anthology, ed. Robert E. Goodin, and Philip Pettit, 591–606. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Milton. 1982. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, David. 2006. Insecurity, and restructuring of unemployment and mental health. In Unemployment and health: International and interdisciplinary perspectives, ed. T. Keiselbach, A. H. Winefield, C. Boyd, S. Anderson, 21–34. Australia: Australian Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, Scott D. 2004. The ethics of care and (capital?) punishment. Law and Philosophy 23: 593–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenhoul, Ruth E. 2004. Connected lives: Human nature and an ethics of care. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, Virginia. 1993. Feminist morality. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, Virginia. 2006. The ethics of care personal, political, and global. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loy, David R. 1997. The religion of the market. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 65 (2): 275–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, Daniel C. 2010. Ethics: A compete method for moral choice. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry, John. 1999. The cancer stage of capitalism. Sterling, VA: Pluto Press. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry, John. 2005. Principles of the good life: The primary theorems of economic reason [Unpublished manuscript circulated amongst EOLSS contributors to the encyclopedia entitled Philosophy and World Problems].

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard R. (ed.). 2005. The limits of market organization. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, D. 1992. The invisible hand, providence and the market. In The values of the enterprise culture, ed. P. Heelas and P. Morris, 217–36. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, state, and utopia. Oxford: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nürnberger, Klaus. 1998. Beyond marx and market: Outcomes of a century of economic experimentation. New York, NY: Zed Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickersgill, Gary M., and Joyce E. Pickersgill. 1974. Contemporary economic systems: A comparative view. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizarro, David. 2000. Nothing more than feelings?: The role of emotions in moral judgment. Journal of the Theory of Social Behavior 30: 355–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1986. The first and second discourses and essays on the origin of languages (trans. and ed. Victor Gourevitch).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, John. 2009. Inequality as policy: The United States since 1979. Real-World Economics Review (51): Online journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweickart, David. 1980. Capitalism or worker control? An ethical and economic appraisal. New York, NY: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweickart, David. 1992. Economic democracy: A worthy socialism that would really work. Science and Society 56 (1): 9–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweickart, David. 1996. Against capitalism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, William H. 2011. Business ethics: A textbook with cases. Wadsworth Publishing (7th edition, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, Peter. 1994. The famine relief argument. In Social and political philosophy, ed. Elizabeth Smith, and H. Gene Blocker, 456–465. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slote, Michael. 1998. Justice and caring. Social Philosophy and Policy 15: 171–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Susan J. 2005. States, markets, and an ethic of care. Political Geography 24: 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sollenius, Jan. 2000. Humane economy. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, Joan C. 1996. Care as a political concept. In Revisioning the political: Feminist reconstructions of traditional concepts in western political theory, eds. Nancy J. Hirschmann, and Christine Di Stefano, 139–155. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, Hal R. 2000. What use is economic theory? In Variants in economic theory: Selected works of Hal R. Varian. 352–360. Nothhampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, Jeremy. 2006. Superseding historic injustice. In Contemporary political philosophy: An anthology, eds. Robert E. Goodin, and Philip Pettit. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilber, Charles K. 1998. Trust, moral hazards, and social economics: Incentives and the organization of work. In Economics, ethics, and public policy, ed. Charles K. Wilber, 93–105. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, Richard D., and Stephen A. Resnick. 1987. Economics: Marxian versus neoclassical. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitria Electra Gatzia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gatzia, D.E. (2011). Towards a Caring Economy. In: Hamington, M., Sander-Staudt, M. (eds) Applying Care Ethics to Business. Issues in Business Ethics, vol 34. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9307-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics