Skip to main content

Knowledge: Genuine and Bogus

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Matter and Mind

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 287))

Abstract

It has been said that humans can fake anything, even altruism and love, as well as science and philosophy. Some theories and practices can be recognized at first sight as being bogus and unrecyclable. This is the case of palmistry, homeopathy, and creation “science.” Others demand plowing through esoteric texts. This is the case of phenomenology, which its founder, Edmund Husserl (1960), launched as a “rigorous science,” yet at the same time as “the polar opposite” of science proper. Phenomenologists claim to be able to know anything instantaneously, apodictically, and exclusively through introspection – by pretending that the external world does not exist, instead of assuming it and exploring it. And, since they reject the scientific method, they do not feel obliged to offer any evidence for their claims. But, since phenomenologists have never produced anything other than phenomenology itself, why should we feel compelled to believe the claim that theirs is a rigorous science?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Reference

  • Barkow, Jerome H., Leda Cosmides, and John Tooby, eds. 1992. The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, John D., Paul C. W. Davies, and Charles L. Harper, Jr., eds. 2004. Science and ultimate reality: Quantum theory, cosmology, and complexity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gintis, Herbert, Samuel Bowles, Robert Boyd, and Ernst Fehr, eds. 2005. Moral sentiments and material interests: The foundations of cooperation in economic life. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. S., A. öhman, and R. J. Dolan. 1998. Conscious and unconscious emotional learning in the human amygdala. Nature 393: 467–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, J. L. 1954. The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, Susan C., Randall D. Marshall, Roger A. McKinnon, Roger Vaughan, Lisa Mellman, and Steven P. Roose. 2000. Can we do psychoanalytic outcome research? A feasibiliy study. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 81: 513–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, Edmund. 1960 [1931]. Cartesian meditations: An introduction to phenomenology. The Hague: M. Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • –––––. 1973. The sociology of science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barraclough, Geoffrey. 1979. Main trends in history. New York and London: Holmes & Meier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, Bruce G. 2006. A history of archaeological thought, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panasiuk, Ryszard, and Leszek Nowak, eds. 1998. Marx’s theories today. Amsterdam-Atlanta: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, Kendrick, ed. 2009. Science under siege: Defending science, exposing pseudoscience. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, Martin. 1983. Science: Good, bad, and bogus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, Paul. 2001. Skeptical odysseys. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • –––––. 2007c. Demarcating science from pseudoscience. In Handbook of the philosophy of science: General philosophy of science – Focal issue, ed. T. Kuipers, 515–75. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Robert L. 2008. Superstition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, Lewis. 1992. The unnatural nature of science. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Ernest. 1961. The life and work of Sigmund Freud, ed. and Abridged by L. Trillling and S. Marcus. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Milton. 1991. Old wine in new bottles. Economic Journal 101: 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, Patrick. 1957. Introduction to logic. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, Eric, 2006. In search of memory: The emergence of a new science of mind. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorter, Edward. 1997. A history of psychiatry. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, Paul, ed. 1985. A skeptic’s handbook of parapsychology. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randi, James. 1982. Flim-Flam! Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, David M. (2004). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind, 2nd ed. Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • –––––. 2003. The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, Gregory, and Thomas Harpending. 2009. The 10,000 year explosion: How civilization accelerated human evolution. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, Stephanie D., and Frans B. M. de Waal. 2002. Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25: 1–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkow, Jerome H. 2006. Introduction: Sometimes the bus does wait. In Missing the revolution: Darwinism for social scientists, 3–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller, David J. 2005. Adapting minds: Evolutionary psychology and the persistent quest for human nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, Elisabeth. 1999. Evolutionary psychology: The burdens of proof. Biology and Philosophy 14: 211–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smail, Daniel Lord. 2008. On deep history and the brain. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flew, Antony, ed. 1987. Readings in the philosophical problems of parapsychology. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolin, Lee. 2006. The trouble with physics: The rise of string theory, the fall of science, and what comes next. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, Richard, and Kate Pickett. 2009. The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, John. 2003. Hitler’s scientists: Science, war, and the devil’s pact. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Charlie, et al. 1972. Science against the people: The story of Jason. http://socrates.berkeley.edu

  • Stonor Saunders, Frances. 2000. Who paid the pipers?: The CIA and the cultural cold war. London: Granta Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stove, David. 1991. The plato cult and other philosophical follies. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Loren R. 1981. Between science and values. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Bunge .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bunge, M. (2010). Knowledge: Genuine and Bogus. In: Matter and Mind. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 287. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9225-0_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics