Abstract
Current national reform recommendations in the United States have largely neglected nature study and place-based learning as an explicit component of scientific content and literacy. The role of nature study needs to be expanded in both science instruction and science teacher preparation. One way to do this is to use a curriculum grounded in nature study and ideally contextualized in the local environment to address a number of current reform movements in science education. This chapter describes how situated learning using Geospatial Information Technologies (GIT) in preservice teacher education courses can be used to study the environment. GIT has become more prevalent in our everyday lives and is commonly used in natural resources management. Web-based applications such as Google Earth allow easy-to-use access to all types of environmental data. Nature study and GIT were used in preservice science teacher courses on campus and through field experience courses offered at Ossabaw Island in Georgia, Grandfather Mountain in North Carolina, and in Brazil. It was found that through collaborative learning communities, students became immersed in the natural world and were able to investigate their own questions. GIT helped students to visually see and analyze relationships in the environment. Through discourse, collaboration, and shared experiences, the teachers were able to apply what they had learned to their own science classrooms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For more information about the Grandfather Mountain and Ossabaw Island course and to see examples of student projects go to http://web.utk.edu/∼start8/506.
- 2.
For more information about Brazil and Grandfather Mountain workshops go to http://www.ncsu.edu/scilink.
References
Abraham, M. R. (1998). The learning cycle approach as a strategy for instruction in science. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 513–524). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
Alibrandi, M. (1998). GIS as a tool in interdisciplinary environmental studies: Student, teacher, and community perspectives. Meridian, 1(2), 1–10.
American Association for the Advancement of Science: Project 2061. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, N., & Stubbs, H. S. (1993). SCI-LINK: An innovative project linking research scientists and science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 4(2), 44–50.
Archie, M., & McCrea, E. (1998). NAAEE: Environmental education in the United States - past, present, and future. Troy, OH: North American Association for Environmental Education.
Audet, R. H., & Paris, J. (1996). GIS implementation model for schools: Assessing the critical concerns. Journal of Geography, 96(6), 293–300.
Baker, T. R. (2002). The effects of Geographic Information System (GIS) technologies on students’ attitudes, self-efficacy, and achievement in middle school science classrooms. PhD dissertation, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KA.
Bayer Facts of Education Survey V. (1999). Nation’s science teacher register concern over U.S. science education in new survey [Electronic Version]. Retrieved August 13, 2008, from www.bayerus.com/msms/news/facts.cfm?mode=detail&id=survey99
Bodzin, A. M. (2008). Integrating instructional technologies in a local watershed investigation with urban elementary learners. Journal of Environmental Education, 39(2), 47–57.
Comstock, A. (1911). Handbook of nature study. Ithaca, NY: Comstock Publishing.
Coulter, B. (2003). Mapping neighborhood trees to enhance math and science skills. Paper presented at the National Urban Forest Conference. Retrieved April 2, 2009, from http://www.umsl.edu/~polmanj/papers/coulter-polman-aera04.pdf
Coulter, B., & Polman, J. L. (2004). Enacting technology-supported inquiry learning through mapping our environment. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association. Retrieved April 2, 2009, from http://www.umsl.edu/~polmanj/papers/coulter-polman-aera04.pdf
Dewey, J. (1915). The school and society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Duggan-Hass, D. (2004). From ecosphere to edusphere: Problems in (mis)managing ecosystems and edusystems. Paper presented at the Complexity Science and Educational Research Caffey’s Locks, Canada.
Engestrom, Y. (1993). Developmental studies on work as a testbench of activity theory. In S. Chaicklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
ESRI. ArcGIS (Version 9.1). (2005). Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.
Gioppo, C., & Barra, V. M. (2005). Primary school evaluation. Curitiba, Brazil: UFPR/SEB-MEC.
Gioppo, C., da Silva, R. V., & Barra, V. M. (2006). Middle school science evaluation. Curitiba, Brazil: UFPR/SEB-MEC.
Hagevik, R. A. (1999). Mapping Our School Site (MOSS). Retrieved 2003, from www.ncsu.edu/scilink/studysite
Hagevik, R. A. (2007). GIS goes to school multiple paper set: Mapping our school site. Paper presented at the National Urban and Regional Information Systems Association.
Hagevik, R. A. (2008). Facilitating scientific inquiry using CITYgreen and the problem-study framework. Meridian Middle Schools Technology Journal, 11(1).
Hagevik, R. A., Hales, D., & Harrell, J. (2007). GIS live and web problem-solving. Meridian Middle Schools Technology Journal, 10(2).
Harte, A. (2002). Taking a measure of community. American Forests, Summer, 108(2), 7–9.
Kerski, J. J. (2000). The implementation and effectiveness of geographic information systems technology and methods in secondary education. PhD dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO.
Kerski, J. J. (2003). The implementation and effectiveness of geographic information systems technology and methods in secondary education. Journal of Geography, 102(3), 128–137.
Kozma, R. (2003). The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 205–226.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Leslie, C. W. (2003). Nature journal: A guided journal for illustrating and recording your observations of the natural world. North Adams, MA: Storey Publishing.
Liberman, G. A., & Hoody, L. L. (1998). Closing the achievement gap: Using the environment as an integrated context for learning. San Diego, CA: State Education and Environmental Roundtable (SEER).
Mason, S. (2008, September 29). Grandfather Mountain becomes 34th state park. WRAL.com.
McKowen-Ice, R. (2000). Environmental education in the United States: A survey of preservice teacher education programs. The Journal of Environmental Education, 32(1), 4–11.
McWilliams, H., & Rooney, P. (1997). Mapping our city: Learning to use spatial data in the middle school science classroom. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2006). Learning to think spatially. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
North American Association for Environmental Education. (2000). Environmental education materials: Guidelines for excellence workbook. Rock Srping, GA: NAAEE.
Orr, D. W. (2004). Earth in mind. Washington, DC: First Island Press.
Robinson, M., & Crowther, D. (2001). Environmental science literacy in science education, biology, and chemistry majors. The American Biology Teacher, 63(1), 9–14.
Roth, C. (1992). Environmental literacy: Its roots, evolution and direction in the 1990s. Columbus, OH: ERIC/CMME, Ohio State University.
State Education and Environment Roundtable. (2008). The EIC model. Retrieved April 6, 2008, from http://www.seer.org/
Stubbs, H. S. (2009). Using technology to develop global teachers: An innovative model. Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal, 12(1).
Stubbs, H., Devine, H., & Hagevik, R. (2002, July). Thinking spatially: Geographic Information Systems (GIS) curricula K-16 and professional development for educators. Paper presented at the 10th International Symposium, Sustainable Development in a Changing and Diverse World, IOSTE Conference, Iguasu Falls, Brazil.
Survey Research Center. (2000). Environmental studies in the K-12 classroom: A teacher’s view. Washington, DC: North American Association for Environmental Education and Literacy Council.
Tryse, D. (2009). Google earth files. Retrieved April 13, 2009, from http://david.tryse.net/googleearth/
UCAR/CSU. (2004). The GLOBE program. Retrieved 2004, from http://www.globe.gov
Volk, T. L., & McBeth, W. (2005). Environmental literacy in the United States. In H. R. Hungerford, W. J. Bluhm, T. L. Volk, & J. M. Ramsey (Eds.), Essential readings in environmental education (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Stipes Publishing.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
White, R. (2005). Interaction with nature during the middle years: Its importance in children’s development and nature’s future [Electronic Version]. White Hutchinson Leisure and Learning Group from http://www.whitehutchinson.com/children/articles/nature.shtml
Woodhouse, J. L., & Knapp, C. E. (2000). Place-based curriculum and instruction: Outdoor and environmental education approaches [Electronic Version]. ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hagevik, R.A., Stubbs, H.S., Whitaker, D.C. (2010). Situated Learning in Environmental Education: Using Geospatial Technologies with Preservice Secondary Teachers. In: Bodzin, A., Shiner Klein, B., Weaver, S. (eds) The Inclusion of Environmental Education in Science Teacher Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9222-9_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9222-9_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9221-2
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9222-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)