Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Employing Eye-Tracking Technology in Researching the Effectiveness of Recasts in CMC

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Directions and Prospects for Educational Linguistics

Part of the book series: Educational Linguistics ((EDUL,volume 11))

Abstract

This chapter reports on an exploratory study, which asked whether eye-tracking technology could help determine what learners attend to in an L2 SCMC task-based learning environment. Eight learners of English completed a two-way information gap with a native speaker of English. The learners’ eye movements were captured using a Tobii 1750 eye tracker. Learner eye movements immediately following a recast by the native speaker were evaluated for duration of eye fixation on the recast. Instances of learner uptake following recasts were also calculated. Results suggest that learners notice just over 60% of intensive recasts. The results also show that lexical recasts were much easier for learners to notice, retain, and use productively in subsequent chat interaction than were grammatical recasts. Further, learners were able to use the noticed lexical recast items more accurately than the noticed grammatical items on the post-test writing measure. Successful uptake ­following recasts was found to occur rarely. Finally, the data suggest that methodologically it may be problematic to consider learner uptake a strong measure of noticing. A call is made for follow-up studies using eye-tracking technology in the exploration of noticing, especially those which seek to correlate the eye-gaze ­measure of noticing with other, more established measures of noticing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Smith (2005) argues for a broadening of the definition of uptake for SCMC to include any productive use of the targeted feature (by the target learner) occurring after the feedback move (delayed uptake). Smith suggests that immediate uptake is less likely to occur in SCMC because learners have access to the written record of the interaction.

References

  • Ammar, Ahlem, and Nina Spada. 2006. One size fits all?: Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28: 543–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauvois, Margaret Healy. 1992. Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals 25(5): 455–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braidi, Susan. 2002. Reexamining the role of recasts in native-speaker/nonnative-speaker interactions. Language Learning 52(1): 1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doughty, Catherine, and Elizabeth Varela. 1998. Communicative focus on form. In Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, ed. Catherine Doughty and Jessica Williams, 114–138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egi, Takako. 2007. Recasts, learners’ interpretations, and L2 development. In Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies, ed. Alison Mackey, 249–268. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, Rod. 2007. The differential effects of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures. In Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical ­studies, ed. Alison Mackey, 339–360. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, Rod, Helen Basturkmen, and Shawn Loewen. 2001. Preemptive focus on form in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly 35(3): 407–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, Rod, Shawn Loewen, and Rosemary Erlam. 2006. Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28(2): 339–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Robert. 2007. How do we know what students are actually doing? Monitoring students’ behavior in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning 20(5): 409–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gass, Susan M. 1997. Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, Susan M., and Alison Mackey. 2000. Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, Susan M., and Evangeline M. Varonis. 1994. Input, interaction, and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16(3): 283–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heins, Barbara, Annette Duensing, Ursula Stickler, and Carolyn Batstone. 2007. Spoken interaction in online and face-to-face language tutorials. Computer Assisted Language Learning 20(3): 279–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwasaki, Junko, and Rhonda Oliver. 2003. Chat-line interaction and negative feedback. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 17: 60–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, Chun, and Yong Zhao. 2006. Noticing and text-based chat. Language Learning and Technology 10(3): 102–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, Chun, Fei Fei, and Robin Roots. 2008. The contingency of recasts and noticing. CALICO Journal 26(1): 70–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeman, Jennifer. 2003. Recasts and second language development: Beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25(1): 37–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loewen, Shawn, and Rosemary Erlam. 2006. Corrective feedback in the chatroom: An experimental study. Computer Assisted Language Learning 19(1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loewen, Shawn, and Jennifer Philp. 2006. Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. Modern Language Journal 90(4): 536–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, Michael H. 1996. The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Handbook of second language acquisition, ed. William Ritchie and Tej Bhatia, 413–468. San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, Michael H., Shunji Inagaki, and Lourdes Ortega. 1998. The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. Modern Language Journal 82(3): 357–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyster, Roy. 2004. Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26(3): 399–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyster, Roy, and Leila Ranta. 1997. Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19(1): 37–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, Alison. 2006. Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics 27(3): 405–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, Alison. 2007. Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, Alison, and Jennifer Philp. 1998. Conversational interaction and development and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal 82(3): 338–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, Alison, Susan M. Gass, and Kim McDonough. 2000. How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22(4): 471–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, Alison, Jennifer Philp, Takako Egi, Akiko Fujii, and Tomoaki Tatsumi. 2002. Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development. In Individual differences and instructed language learning, ed. Peter Robinson, 181–208. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, Kim. 2005. Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners’ responses on ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27(1): 79–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, Howard, Patsy M. Lightbown, and Nina Spada. 2001. Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning 51(4): 719–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Rhonda. 1995. Negative feedback in child NS-NNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17(4): 459–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Rhonda, and Alison Mackey. 2003. Interactional context and feedback in child ESL ­classrooms. Modern Language Journal 87(4): 519–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke, Breffni. 2008. The other C in CMC: What alternative data sources can tell us about text-based synchronous computer mediated communication and language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning 21(3): 227–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, Lourdes. 2009. Interaction and attention to form in L2 test-based computer-mediated ­communication. In Multiple perspectives on interaction, ed. Alison Mackey and Charlene Polio, 226–253. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J.Scott, and Paul J. Whitney. 2002. Developing L2 oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: Output, working memory, and interlanguage development. CALICO Journal 20(1): 7–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellettieri, Jill. 1999. Why-talk? Investigating the role of task-based interaction through synchronous network-based communication among classroom learners of Spanish. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Davis, CA: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philp, Jennifer. 2003. Constraints on “noticing the gap”: Nonnative speakers’ noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25(1): 99–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, Rebecca, and Bo-Ram Suh. 2007. Textually enhanced recasts, learner awareness, and L2 outcomes in synchronous computer-mediated interaction. In Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies, ed. Alison Mackey, 197–227. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagarra, Nuria. 2007. From CALL to face-to-face interaction: The effect of computer-delivered recasts and working memory on L2 development. In Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies, ed. Alison Mackey, 229–248. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satar, Muge H., and Nesrin Özdener. 2008. The effects of synchronous CMC on speaking ­proficiency and anxiety: Text versus voice chat. The Modern Language Journal 92(4): 595–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauro, Shannon. 2009. Computer-mediated corrective feedback and the development of L2 grammar. Language Learning and Technology 13(1): 96–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Richard. 1993. Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 13: 206–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheen, YoungHee. 2004. Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research 8(3): 263–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheen, YoungHee. 2006. Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research 10(3): 361–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheen, YoungHee. 2007. The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly 41(2): 255–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shehadeh, Ali. 2001. Self- and other-initiated modified output during task-based interaction. TESOL Quarterly 35(3): 433–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Bryan. 2003. Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. Modern Language Journal 87(1): 38–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Bryan. 2005. The relationship between negotiated interaction, learner uptake, and lexical acquisition in task-based computer-mediated communication. TESOL Quarterly 39(1): 33–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Bryan. 2008. Methodological hurdles in capturing CMC data: The case of the missing ­self-repair. Language Learning and Technology 12(1): 85–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Bryan, and Greta J. Gorsuch. 2004. Synchronous computer mediated communication ­captured by usability lab technologies: New interpretations. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics 32(4): 553–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Bryan, and Shannon Sauro. 2009. Interruptions in chat. Computer Assisted Language Learning 22(3): 229–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarone, Elaine, and Martha Bigelow. 2007. Alphabetic print literacy and oral language processing in SLA. In Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies, ed. Alison Mackey, 101–122. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trofimovich, Pavel, Ahlem Ammar, and Elizabeth Gatbonton. 2007. How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies, ed. Alison Mackey, 171–195. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tudini, Vincenza. 2007. Negotiation and intercultural learning in Italian native speaker chat rooms. Modern Language Journal 91(4): 577–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Arizona State University, Phoenix, USA

    Bryan Smith

Authors
  1. Bryan Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. Bicultural-Bilingual Studies, University of Texas, San Antonio, UTSA Circle 1, San Antonio, 78249, USA

    Francis M. Hult

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, B. (2010). Employing Eye-Tracking Technology in Researching the Effectiveness of Recasts in CMC. In: Hult, F. (eds) Directions and Prospects for Educational Linguistics. Educational Linguistics, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9136-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation