Skip to main content

Verification Through Shaking Table Testing of EC8-Based Assessment Approaches Applied to a Building Designed for Gravity-Loads

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering

Part of the book series: Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering ((GGEE,volume 13))

  • 2593 Accesses

Abstract

Recent events in Italy and in other countries with similar building stock have demonstrated the need of an extensive campaign of assessment to define the seismic risk and outline the intervention policy especially for buildings devoted to public or important functions (hospitals, fire brigade buildings, schools, etc.) and for the infrastructures. Advanced codes of practice, like EC8, or those implementing similar concepts, have introduced in the last years accurate verification procedures based on the mixed use of numerical and experimental investigations, to qualify the level of knowledge of the existing structures first, and to verify the compliance with limit state requirements for seismic loads, second. Since the introduction of the assessment approaches in the codes several applications to real cases have been developed. However, the number of studies carried out to verify their real efficiency is still limited. This would require a more extended campaign of analyses to better validate procedures and safety requirement assumptions. The work presented in this paper aims at contributing to the experimental verification of code assessment approaches in the common case of an irregular multi-storey RC building designed for gravity loads. As required in the assessment procedures, linear and non linear analyses have been applied to determine the performance level of the building at each limit state. Then a dynamic testing campaign has been performed on the advanced testing facility at EUCENTRE in Italy, to directly verify the effects of seismic loading. An innovative system of high definition digital cameras developed at EUCENTRE has allowed the acquisition of a rich base of data in the shaking table tests and a careful comparison of the results in terms of local and global response parameters to those obtained from the code procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Calvi GM, Bolognini D, (2001) Seismic response of reinforced concrete frames infilled with weakly reinforced masonry panels. J Earthq Eng 5(2):153–185

    Google Scholar 

  2. Casarotti C, Peloso S, Lunghi F (2009) NEARB-3274: System identification of a torsionally-coupled building. XIII ANIDIS National Conference Proceedings to be published.

    Google Scholar 

  3. CEN (2005) EN 1998-3:2005 – Eurocode 8 Design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings. European Committee for Standardisation, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  4. Crisafulli FJ (1997) Seismic behavior of reinforced concrete structures with masonry infills. PhD Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, New Zealand, http://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/handle/10092/1221

  5. Crisafulli FJ, Carr AJ, Park R (2005) Experimental response of framed masonry structures designed with new reinforcing details. Bull NZ Soc Earthq Eng 38(1):19–32

    Google Scholar 

  6. Decanini LD, Bertoldi SH, Gavarini C (1993) Telai tamponati soggetti ad azione sismica, un modello semplificato: confronto sperimentale e numerico. Atti del 6° convegno nazionale. ANIDIS 2:815–824, Perugia 13–15

    Google Scholar 

  7. Decreto Ministeriale 14/01/2008, Gazzetta Ufficiale n.29 del 4/2/2008, supplemento ordinario n. 30, Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fardis M, Negro P (2005) Seismic assessment and rehabilitation of existing buildings. Proceeding of SPEAR international workshop, Ispra, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kakaletsis DJ, Karayannis CG (2008) Influence of masonry strength and openings on infilled R7C frames under cycling loading. J Earthq Eng 12:197–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lanese I (2007) Valutazione numerico-sperimentale del comportamento sismico di un edificio esistente progettato per soli carchi verticali. Tesi di Laurea, Università degli Studi di Pavia, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lanese I, Marazzi F, Nascimbene R (2008) Il cambiamento di scala delle strutture per la verifica sismica su tavola vibrante di un telaio in c.a. progettato per carichi verticali. Ingegneria Sismica 4:13–25

    Google Scholar 

  12. Magenes G, Pampanin S (2004) Seismic response of gravity-load design frames with masonry infills, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  13. Magenes L (2008) Confronto tra un metodo di valutazione strutturale agli spostamenti e i metodi alle forze proposti dall’OPCM 3274. Tesi di Laurea, Università degli Studi di Pavia, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  14. Masi A (2003) Seismic vulnerability assessment of gravity load designed R/C frames. Bull Earthq Eng 1:371–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ordinanza n. 3274 del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri, Gazzetta Ufficiale 5 marzo 2003, Supplemento Ordinario n. 72 della G.U. n. 105 del 8.05.2003, Primi elementi in materia di criteri generali per la classificazione sismica del territorio nazionale e di normative tecniche per le costruzioni in zona sismica

    Google Scholar 

  16. Paulay T, Priestley MJN (1992) Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. Wiley, New York, NY

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Pavese A, Lanese I, Scovenna MP, Franzolin R, Lunghi F, Airouche H, Casarotti C, Peloso S (2008) NEARB project: numerical and experimental assessment recommendations inherent existing RC buildings included in OPCM 3274. Final research report

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Part of the current work has been carried out under the financial auspices of the Italian Civil Protection, within the framework of the Executive Project 2005–2008 (Research Project #1) and of the Executive Project 2008–2011 (Project e3). Such support is gratefully acknowledged by the authors. The authors would also like to thank the Cariplo Foundation, for the contribution within the project “Use of innovative materials for strengthening and reparation of R.C. structures in high seismicity areas” and Consorzio ReLUIS for the contribution within the project “ReLUIS Linea 1”.

Finally, a special thank is due to the EUCENTRE lab staff, whose support has been crucial in the implementation and interpretation of the whole test campaign.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto Pavese .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pavese, A., Lanese, I. (2010). Verification Through Shaking Table Testing of EC8-Based Assessment Approaches Applied to a Building Designed for Gravity-Loads. In: Fardis, M. (eds) Advances in Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8746-1_44

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics