Abstract
Ask a scientist what “risk” means and, more likely than not, they will emphasize the likelihood of something nasty happening. But, as communicators and social scientists have examined the interface of technology and society more closely during the last 25 years, they have reached a general consensus that non-scientists view risk in an almost antithetically different way from those in the scientific community. Social scientist Peter Sandman (1991) has said, “The things that kill people and the things that scare people are diametrically opposed.” For scientists and engineers, and those who communicate about their work, the take-home lesson is this: citing the probability of something negative happening is never enough. If you want people who do not share your scientific viewpoint to accept your information, you’ll have to do more than cite probability. Scientists and engineers who deal in risk are usually driven by numbers and hard data obtained from tests and experiments. While these may be quantitatively valid for setting exposure levels and probabilities of accidents, such scientific observations do not deal with the broader public’s hard-to-measure psychological reactions to risks. The non-probabilistic aspects of risk are the focus of this chapter. When communicating about risk, public trust and the communicator’s credibility are the most important factors. Content has been shown to be secondary to these intangibles.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References and Further Reading
Adubato S (2008) What were they thinking?: Crisis communication – the good, the bad, and the totally clueless. Rutgers University Press, Piscataway, NJ
Fearn-Banks K (2007) Crisis communications: A casebook approach, 3rd edn. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
Gutteling JM, Wiegman O (1996) Exploring risk communication. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
Hance BJ, Chess C, Sandman PM (1990) Industry risk communication manual: Improving dialogue with communities. Lewis Publishers/CRC, Boca Raton, FL
Hilldorfer J, Dugoni R (2004) The cyanide canary. Free Press, New York
Kamrin MA, Katz DJ, Walter ML (1995) Reporting on risk: A journalists handbook on environmental risk assessment. Michigan Sea Grant, Ann Arbour
Leiss W, Powell DA (2005) Mad cows and mother’s milk: The perils of poor risk communication, 2nd edn. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal
Leviton LC, Needleman CE, Shapiro MA (1997) Confronting public health risks: A decision maker’s guide. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
Lundgren R, McMakin A (2009) Risk communication: A handbook for communicating environmental, safety, and health risks. Wiley-IEEE, Hoboken, NJ
National Research Council (1989) Improving risk communication. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
Sadar AJ, Shull MD (eds) (1999) Environmental risk communication: Principles and practices for industry. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL
Sandman PM (1986) Getting to maybe: some communications aspects of siting hazardous waste facilities. Seton Hall Legislative J 9(2):437–465
Sandman PM (1991) Risk=hazard + outrage: A formula for effective risk communciation: Professional Development Courses and Products. American Industrial Hygeine Association Distance Learning, Fairfax, VA
Sellnow TL, Ulmer RR, Seeger MW, Littlefield RS (2008) Effective risk communication: A message-centered approach. Springer, New York, NY
Slovic P (1987) Perception of risk. Science 236:280–285
Society for Risk Analysis (2009) Risk analysis glossary. http://www.sra.org/resources_glossary.php Cited 27 July 2009
Ulmer RR, Sellnow TL, Seeger MW (2006) Effective crisis communication: Moving from crisis to opportunity. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
West B, Greenberg M (2003) Reporter’s environmental handbook, 3rd edn. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ
Wiebe GD (1973) Mass media and man’s relationship to his environment. J Quart 50(426–432):446
Wogalter M, Dejoy D, Laughery KR (eds) (1999) Warnings and risk communication. Taylor & Francis, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jurin, R.R., Roush, D., Danter, J. (2010). Communicating About Risk. In: Environmental Communication. Second Edition. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3987-3_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3987-3_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3986-6
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3987-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)