Skip to main content

Health-Service Organisation, Clinical Team Composition and Student Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Developing Learning Professionals

Part of the book series: Professional and Practice-based Learning ((PPBL,volume 7))

Abstract

Although clinical placements are an integral part of health-profession education, in contrast to university settings where education is a primary focus of activity, the health services that host these placements are primarily configured for clinical services. As a result, health-service staff supervise students in an environment where work priorities are centred on patient care rather than on student learning. Moreover, health services are complex and dynamic environments where student-learning opportunities vary greatly. As part of a project to identify and build leadership capacity for quality student learning within clinical teams, a model for team development was tested in three different health-service teams. The process of identifying and enrolling the selected teams permitted some observations to be made by the project team regarding the ways in which the organisation of health services shaped student-learning opportunities. The more complex the health service in terms of size, clinical team composition and patient or client care responsibilities, the fewer opportunities staff had to come together as a team to discuss and plan student learning. In addition, the more complex the health service, the greater the number of universities placing students and the greater the number of different programmes and levels of study represented, rendering the task of planning more difficult. It is proposed that what is required are negotiations across institutions that are sensitive to the complexities of clinical practice and also mindful of the need for students to be supported and engaged in ways that allow them to contribute and learn effectively in doing so.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These three clinical teams participated in the Leadership for Excellence Project ‘Using TMS to identify and build leadership for quality learning in clinical healthcare teams.’ Support for the project was provided by the Australian Learning and Teaching Council, an initiative of the Australian Government Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the Australian Learning and Teaching Council or of the Australian Government.

  2. 2.

    Despite having less autonomy to reorganise their day-to-day activities to improve student learning opportunities, as a result of participation in the project, both the aged-care and country hospital teams identified and created changes within their organisations to enhance student learning.

  3. 3.

    The country hospital team was the only one of the three teams in which students from more than one discipline were observed in the same workplace.

References

  • Boor, K., Scheele, F., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., Teunissen, P. W., den Breejen, E. M. E., & Scherpbier, A. J. J. A. (2008). How undergraduate clinical learning climates differ: A multi-method case study. Medical Education, 42(7), 1029–1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourbonnais, F. F., & Kerr, E. (2007). Preceptoring a student in the final clinical placement: Reflections from nurses in a Canadian hospital. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16(8), 1543–1547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, C., Cooper, H., & Watkins, C. (2004). Do none of you talk to each other?: The challenges facing the implementation of inter-professional education. Medical Teacher, 26(6), 545–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catchpole, K., Mishra, A., Handa, A., & McCulloch, P. (2008). Teamwork and error in the operating room. Analysis of skills and roles. Annals of Surgery, 247(4), 699–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dornan, T., Boshuizen, H., King, N., & Scherpbier, A. (2007). Experience-based learning: A model linking the processes and outcomes of medical students’ workplace learning. Medical Education, 41(1), 84–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flin, R., & Maran, N. (2004). Identifying and training non-technical skills for teams in acute medicine. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13(suppl. 1), i80–i84. DOI:10.1136/qshc.2004.009993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, R., & Morris, J. (2001). Student placements- Is there evidence supporting team skills development in clinical practice settings?. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 15(2), 171–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Le Maistre, C., & Pare, A. (2004). Learning in two communities: The challenge for universities and workplaces. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(1/2), 44–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, P. (2004). A model of teaching and learning in the operating theatre. Medical Education, 38(12), 1278–1287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manser, T. (2009). Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: A review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiology Scandanavia, 53(2), 143–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manser, T., Harrison, T. K., Gaba, D. M., & Howard, S. K. (2009). Coordination pattern related to high clinical performance in a simulated anesthetic crisis. Anesthetic Analgesia, 108(5), 1606–1615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormack, B., & Slater, P. (2006). An evaluation of the clinical education facilitator. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 15(2), 135–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodger, S., Webb, G., Devitt, L., Gilbert, J., Wrightson, P., & McMeekin, J. (2008). Clinical education and practice placements in the allied health professions: An international perspective. Journal of Allied Health, 37(1), 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wray, N., & McCall, L. (2009). ‘They don’t know much about us’: Educational reform impacts on students’ learning in the clinical environment. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14(5), 665–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the contribution of the clinical teams and health services who participated in this project together with the Building Leadership for Quality Learning project team. We also acknowledge the support provided by the Australian Learning and Teaching Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maree O’Keefe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

O’Keefe, M., McAllister, S., Stupans, I. (2011). Health-Service Organisation, Clinical Team Composition and Student Learning. In: Billett, S., Henderson, A. (eds) Developing Learning Professionals. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3937-8_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics