Abstract
This chapter explores the nature and origin of RIKA (Japanese school science) teachers’ professional knowledge. For this purpose, leading elementary RIKA teachers’ quality discourses on what RIKA should be or what the aims and goals of their RIKA lessons should be are analysed. Certain components of such discourses that are different from those of “authentic science” teaching are identified and classified. Then, the chapter explores why and how such clusters of components have been involved in RIKA teachers’ notions of the ideal of RIKA teaching. There is considerable anecdotal data that RIKA teachers’ professional knowledge is different from that of elementary science teachers in western countries. One central aspect of this is that RIKA teachers need to develop a unique capability to cope with other factors than teaching “science” in their science classrooms, in particular RIKA teachers’ professional knowledge will be “indigenized”. The chapter will consider the specific questions of “What are the differences between the nature of RIKA teachers’ professional knowledge for teaching indigenized science (RIKA in the Japanese context) and that of western science teachers?” “Why and how has ‘indigenization of professional knowledge among science teachers’ been occurring?” “Why and how do teachers develop such indigenized professional knowledge?”
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Rika is the Japanese name for school science, and “elementary Rika teacher” in this study refers to “elementary teacher who identifies himself/herself to be a science major teacher” and in most cases, he/she holds lower-secondary Rika teacher’s certificate as well as elementary teacher’s certificate, because in Japan there is no Rika-specific certificate for elementary school.
- 2.
Gakushu Shido Yoryo (GSY) is written in Japanese. Translation into English, if needed, was done by the present author.
References
Abell, S. K. (2006). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1140). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Aikenhead, G. S., & Ogawa, M. (2007). Indigenous knowledge and science revisited. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 539–591.
Aikenhead, G. S., & Otsuji, H. (2000). Japanese and Canadian science teachers’ views on science and culture. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11, 277–299.
Appleton, K. (2006). Elementary science teaching. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 493–535). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Duke, B. (2009). The history of modern Japanese education: Constructing the national school system, 1872–1890. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Fernandez-Balboa, J. M., & Stiehl, J. (1995). The generic nature of pedagogical content knowledge among college professors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 293–306.
Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. G. (2001). Examining pedagogical content knowledge. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Herbert, J. F. (1892). The science of education. London: Swan Sonnenschein
Isozaki, T. (2002). Research on curriculum development of science and mathematics teacher education for promoting the twenty first century science and mathematics education. Higashi-Hiroshima: Hiroshima University. (In Japanese).
Isozaki, T., Yoneda, N., Chujo, K., Isozaki, T., Hirano, T., & Tanzawa, T. (2007). Theoretical and empirical research on the pedagogical content knowledge in the case of lower secondary science teachers. Journal of Science Education in Japan, 31(4), 195–209. (In Japanese with English abstract).
Jones, M. G., & Carter, G. (2006). Science teacher attitudes and beliefs. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1067–1104). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kawasaki, K. (1992). An epistemological study on “Kansatsu” believed to be a precise equivalent for “Observation.” Bulletin of Society of Japan Science Teaching, 33(1), 71–80. (In Japanese with English abstract).
Kawasaki, K. (1996). The concept of science in Japanese and western education. Science & Education, 5, 1–20.
Kawasaki, K. (1999). A deductive description of cultural diversity of “observation” in science education. Journal of Science Education in Japan, 23(4), 258–270.
Maeda, K., & Sato, T. (2004). Teacher-training course students’ and elementary school teachers’ views of science teaching. Memoirs of the Faculty of Education, Kumamoto University. Natural Science, 53, 51–57. (In Japanese).
Masschelein, J., & Ricken, N. (2003). Do we (still) need the concept of Bildung? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 35(2), 139–154.
Murthy, P. A. N. (1973). A historical study of the role of education in the making of modern Japan. New Delhi: Ashajanak Publications.
Ogawa, M. (1986). Toward a new rationale of science education in a non-western society. European Journal of Science Education, 8, 113–119.
Ogawa, M. (1995). Science education in a multi-science perspective. Science Education, 79, 583–593.
Ogawa, M. (1998). A cultural history of science education in Japan: An epic description. In W. W. Cobern (Ed.), Socio-cultural perspective on science education (pp. 139–161). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Ogawa, M. (2001). Reform Japanese style: Voyage into an unknown and chaotic future. Science Education, 85, 586–606.
Ogawa, M. (2002a). How are the novice getting to be the expert?: A preliminary case study on Japanese science teachers. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 22, 1082–1102.
Ogawa, M. (2002b). Nature of indigenous science: A stratified and amalgamated model of knowledge and cosmology. Paper presented to the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Australasian Science Education Research Association, Townsville, Australia.
Shimizu, M. (2002). Teachers’ views of the philosophy of science and the way science is taught in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Education (Society of Japan Science Teaching), 42(2), 43–50. (In Japanese with English abstract).
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Tanzawa, T., Kumano, Y., Tsuchida, S., Katahira, K., Imamura, T., & Nagasu, N. (2003). Characteristics of Japanese views on science and technology. Journal of Research in Science Education (Society of Japan Science Teaching), 44(1), 1–12.
Toda, K. (1992). Pre-service science teachers’ view of science and its influence on their selection of science teaching methods. Bulletin of Society of Japan Science Teaching, 33(1), 59–70. (In Japanese with English abstract).
Westbury, I., Hopmann, S., & Riquarts, K. (Eds.). (2000). Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wimmer, M. (2003). Ruins of Bildung in a knowledge society: Commenting on the debate about the future of Bildung. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 35(2), 167–187.
List of the Papers Used for Study II and Study III (All the papers were written in Japanese and the excerpts referred were translated by the present author)
Igarashi, H. (1987). Teaching materials on living things and its environment in elementary school Rika. Rika no Kyoiku, 36(4), 34–37.
Ishii, M. (2006). Considering Rika from the origin. Rika no Kyoiku, 55(2), 16–17.
Ito, H. (2006). Seeking to make students experiences joy of learning, by doing science. Rika no Kyoiku, 55(11), 19–21.
Kikkawa, H. (1997). Learning Rika by children’s viewpoints. Rika no Kyoiku, 46(1), 20–22.
Murayama, T. (2008). Course contents of new B-unit “Life and Earth.” Rika no Kyoiku, 57(5), 20–23.
Nagai, M. (1966). Instruction guiding pupils toward discovery of facts, principles and laws. Rika no Kyoiku, 15(7), 27–29.
Sakita, T. (2008). To nurture children loving science. Rika no Kyoiku, 57(4), 14–16.
Tanino, Y. (1976). Improving instruction of outdoor Kansatsu in the units of living things. Rika no Kyoiku, 25(7), 19–22.
Tsuyuki, K. (2007). What children commune with Shizen. Rika no Kyoiku, 56(2), 20–22.
Ueno, K. (2006). What would Rika be in next 10 years? Rika no Kyoiku, 55(2), 18–19.
Watanabe, M. (2008). What fan it is to observe in detail! Rika no Kyoiku, 57(5), 44–46.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ogawa, M. (2011). Japanese Elementary Rika Teachers’ Professional Beliefs and Knowledge of Rika Teaching: How Are They Indigenized?. In: Corrigan, D., Dillon, J., Gunstone, R. (eds) The Professional Knowledge Base of Science Teaching. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3927-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3927-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3926-2
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3927-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)