Abstract
Leadership has long been seen as a key factor in organisational effectiveness, and the interest in educational leadership has increased over recent decades. This is due to a number of reasons, often related to changes to the education system, such as the growth of school-based management in many countries over the past two decades, which has meant more influence for the school and therefore a greater role for the school manager, as powers and responsibilities have been delegated or even devolved from national, regional, or local levels to the school. This has inevitably led to a growth in the importance of the school leader and his/her individual role, and therefore to a greater interest in leadership as a key factor in school effectiveness and improvement.
The chapter looks at the state of the art regarding the knowledge about the role of school leadership for the quality and development of schools and the achievement of their pupils. First, a brief summary of findings of school effectiveness and school improvement research is given, highlighting the pivotal role of school leadership, Then, a hint at the interest in learning from the private sector as a contributing factor in the blossoming of leadership in education among policy makers and researchers is made. The main part of the chapter focuses on the growing body of literature dealing with the effectiveness of school leadership as represented in meta-studies and literature reviews of school leader effectiveness. Four main perspectives are distinguished. Then, three models (direct-effects models, mediated-effects models and reciprocal-effects models) are presented to classify studies on administrator effects. Examples of reviews to this topic are named, and some of them are presented briefly. Finally, lessons learnt from the review are provided and discussed. Effective leadership can be expected to be a factor that helps create the conditions under which teachers can be optimally effective, which in turn would result in higher levels of pupil performance. It is concluded that the question which should be asked is no longer whether principals do make a difference but more particularly which means they apply and through which paths they achieve such effects. Limitations, such as the tendency to jump rapidly from a limited research base to prescriptions for practice, a strong reliance on dualistic models in the field, an overreliance on change metaphors in research on educational leadership and deficiencies in research methods are discussed and a point is made for more rigorous quantitative and qualitative research and better “fits” of theories, empirical research and experienced practice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Altrichter, H. & Posch, P. (1998). Lehrer erforschen ihren Unterricht. Klinkhardt: Bad Heilbrunn.
Andrews, R. & Soder, R. (1987). Principal leadership and student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(1), 77–96.
Bamburg, J.D. & Andrews, R.L. (1991). School goals, principals, and achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2, 175–191.
Barth, R.S. (1990). Improving schools from within: Teachers, parents and principals can make a difference. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Bell, L., Bolam, R. & Cubillo, L. (2003). A systematic review of the impact of school leadership and management on student outcomes. In: Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
Biggs, J.B. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: Open University Press/Society for Research into Higher Education.
Bolam, R. (1993). School-based management, school improvement and school effectiveness: overview and implications. In C. Dimmock (Hrsg.), School-based management and school effectiveness (S. 219–234). London: Routledge.
Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Pocklington, K. & Weindling, D. (1993). Effective Management in Schools: A Report for the Department for Education via the School Management Task Force Professional Working Party. HMSO, London.
Bossert, S., Dwyer, D., Rowan, B. & Lee, G. (1982). The instructional management role of the principal. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(3), 34–64.
Brewer, D.J. (1993). Principals and student outcomes: evidence from U.S. high schools. Economics of Education Review, 12(4), 281–292.
Brookover, W.B. (1979). School social systems and student achievement: schools can make a difference. New York: Praeger.
Brookover, W., Beady, C., Flood, P., Schweitzer, J. & Wisenbaker, J. (1979). School social systems and student achievement: schools can make a difference. New York: Praeger.
Caldwell, B.J. & Spinks, J.M. (1992). Leading the Self-Managing School. London & Washington, DC: The Falmer Press.
Cheng, Y.C. (1994). Principal’s leadership as a critical indicator of school performance: evidence from multi-levels of primary schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy, and Practice, 5(3), 299–317.
Cheng, Y.C. (2002) The changing context of school leadership: implications for paradigm shift. In K. Leithwood & P. Hallinger (Eds.). Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration. Norwell, MA, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Creemers, B.P. (1994). The effective classroom. London: Cassell.
Creemers, B. & Kyriakides, L. (2004). The dynamics of educational effectiveness. Abingdon: Routledge.
D’Agostino, J.V. (2000). Instructional and school effects on students’ longitudinal reading and mathematics achievements. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 11(2), 197–235.
Dalin, P., Rolff, H.-G. & Buchen, H. (1990). Institutionelles Schulentwicklungsprogramm. Soest: Soester Verlagskontor.
Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37, 15–24.
Fullan, M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. London: Cassell.
Fullan, M. (1992). Successful school improvement. Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: probing the depths of educational reform. London, Falmer Press.
Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.
Fullan, M.G. (1996). Turning systemic thinking on its head. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(6), 420–423.
Goldring, E.B. & Pasternak, R. (1994). Principals’ coordinating strategies and school effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5, 237–251.
Gray, J. (1990). The quality of schooling: frameworks for judgements. British Journal of Educational Studies, 38(3), 204–233.
Gunter, H. (2001) Critical approaches to leadership in education. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 2, 94–108.
Hall, G.E. & Hord, S.M. (1987). Change in schools: facilitating the process. New York: State University of New York Press.
Hallinger, P. & Heck, R.H. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157–191.
Hallinger, P. & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional leadership behavior of principals. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217–248.
Hallinger, P., Bickman, L. & Davis, K. (1996). School context, principal leadership, and student reading achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 96(5), 527–549.
Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing time: teachers’ work and culture in the post modern age. London: Cassell.
Harris, A. (2004). Distributed leadership and school improvement: leading or misleading? Educational Management Administration Leadership, 32(1), 11–24.
Hattie, J. (2005). What is the nature of evidence that makes a difference to learning. Paper presented at the Australian Council for Educational Research Conference ‘Using Data to Support Learning’, 7–9 August 2005, Melbourne.
Heck, R. (1993). School context, principal leadership, and achievement: the case of secondary schools in Singapore. The Urban Review, 25(2), 151–66.
Heck, R.H., Larsen, T.J. & Marcoulides, G.A. (1990). Instructional leadership and school achievement: validation of a causal model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(2), 94–125.
Hopkins, D., Ainscow, M. & West, M. (1994). School improvement in an era of change. London: Cassell.
Hopkins, D., West, M., et al. (1996). Improving the quality of education for all: progress and challenge. London: Fulton.
Huber, S.G. (1997). Initial teacher training and teaching competence: some lessons from England for Bavaria? Cambridge: School of Education, University of Cambridge.
Huber, S.G. (1999a). School effectiveness: was macht Schule wirksam? Internationale Schulentwicklungsforschung (I). Schul-Management, 2, 10–17.
Huber, S.G. (1999b). School improvement: Wie kann Schule verbessert werden? Internationale Schulentwicklungsforschung (II). Schul-Management, 3, 7–18.
Huber, S.G. (2008a). School development and school leader development: new learning opportunities for school leaders and their schools. In J. Lumby, G. Crow & P. Pashiardis (Eds.). International handbook on the preparation and development of school leaders, 173–175. New York: Routledge.
Huber, S.G. (2008b). Steuerungshandeln schulischer Führungskräfte aus Sicht der Schulleitungsforschung. In R. Langer (Eds.). Warum tun die das? Governanceanalysen zum Steuerungshandeln in der Schulentwicklung, 95–126. Wiesbaden: VS.
Huber, S.G. (2008c). Was Lehrkräfte davon abhält zusammenzuarbeiten – Bedingungen für das Gelingen von Kooperation. In A. Bartz, J. Fabian, S.G. Huber, C. Kloft, H. Rosenbusch & H. Sassenscheidt (Eds.). PraxisWissen Schulleitung (81.10). München: Wolters Kluwer.
Huber, S.G. (2009). Schulleitung. In S. Blömeke, T. Bohl, L. Haag, G. Lang-Wojtasik & W. Sacher, Werner (Eds.). Handbuch Schule Theorie – Organisation – Entwicklung, 502–511. Bad Heilbrunn: Verlag Julius Klinkhardt.
Huberman, M. (1992). Critical introduction. In M. Fullan (Eds.). Successful school improvement (S. 1-20). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Joyce, B. (1991). The doors to school improvement. Educational Leadership, May, 59–62.
Kotter, J.P. (2000). Leading change: why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review. Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation. All rights reserved. March–April 1995 61 Leadership, 44(6), 9–11.
Leithwood, K. (1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 498–518.
Leithwood, K. & Jantzi, D. (1999). Transformational leadership effects: a replication. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 4(10), 451–479.
Leithwood, K. & Montgomery, D. (1982). The role of the elementary principal in program improvement. Review of Educational Research, 52(3), 309–339.
Leithwood, K.A. (1992). The principal’s role in teacher development. In M. Fullan & A. Hargreaves (Hrsg.), Teacher development and educational change (S. 86–103). London: The Falmer Press.
Leithwood, K.A. & Riehl, C. (2003). What do we already know about successful school leadership? AERA Paper Task Force on Developing Research in Educational Leadership.
Leithwood, K., Cousins, B. & Gerin-Lajoie, D. (1993). Years of transition, times for change: a review and analysis of pilot projects investigating issues in the transition years (Vol. 2: Explaining variations in progress). Toronto: Final Report of Research to the Ontario Ministry of Education, Canada.
Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., Harris, A. & Hopkins, D. (2007). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership, 28(1), 27–42.
Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S. & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). Review of research: how leadership influences student learning. Wallace Foundation. Downloaded from http://www.wallacefoundation.org/NR/rdonlyres/E3BCCFA5-A88B-45D3-8E27-973732283C9/0/ReviewofResearchLearningFromLeadership.pdf on December 19, 2007.
Leitner, D. (1994). Do principals affect student outcomes? School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(3), 219–238.
Levine, D.U. & Lezotte, L.W. (1990). Unusually effective schools: a review and analysis of research and practice. Madison: National Centre for Effective School Research.
Marzano, R.J., McNulty, B.A. & Waters, T. (2005). School leadership that works: from research to results. Alexandra, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
Mortimore, P., Sammons, P., Stoll, L., Lewis, D. & Ecob, R. (1988). School matters: the junior years. Somerset: Open Books.
Muijs, D. & Reynolds, D. (2001). Effective teaching, evidence and practice. London: Falmer Press.
Muijs, D., Harris, A., Lumby, J., Marrison, M. & Sood, K. (2006). Leadership and leadership development in highly effective further education providers. Is there a relationship? Journal of Further and Higher Education, 30(1), 87–106.
Ogawa, R. & Bossert, S. (1995). Leadership as an organisational quality. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(2), 224–243.
Peters, T. & Waterman, P. (1983). In search of excellence. New York: Bantam Books.
Pitner, N. (1988). The study of administrator effects and effectiveness. In N. Boyan (Ed.). Handbook of research in educational administration, 99–122. New York: Longman.
Reynolds, D. (1976). The delinquent school. In M. Hammersley & P. Woods (Eds.). The Process of Schooling, 217–229. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Reynolds, D., Bollen, R., Creemers, B., Hopkins, D., Stoll, L. & Lagerweij, N. (Eds.). (1996). Making good schools: linking school effectiveness and school improvement. London: Routledge.
Reynolds, D., Clarke, P. & Harris, A. (2004). Improving schools in exceptionally challenging circumstances. American Education Research Association Conference, 11–16th April, San Diego.
Robinson, V.M.J. (2007). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: making sense of the evidence. The Leadership Challenge: Improving Learning in Schools. Conference Proceedings of the ACER Research Conference 2007, `The Leadership Challenge: Improving learning in schools’, 12–14 August, Melbourne, Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER), Camberwell, pp. 12–16, http://www.acer.edu.au/research_conferences/2007.html
Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P. & Ouston, J. (1979). Fifteen thousand hours. London: Open Books.
Sammons, P., Hillman, J. & Mortimore, P. (1995). Key characteristics of effective schools: a review of school effectiveness research. A report by the Institute of Education for the Office for Standards in Education. London: Institute of Education.
Scheerens, J. & Bosker, R.J. (1997). The foundations of educational effectiveness. New York: Elsevier.
Scott, C. & Teddlie, C. (1987). Student, teacher and principal academic expectations and attributed responsibility as predictors of student achievement. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Research Association, Washington, DC.
Sergiovanni, T.J. (1999). Rethinking leadership: a collection of articles. Arlington Heights, IL: Skylight Training and Publishing Inc.
Silins, H.C. (1994). The relationship between transformational and transactional leadership and school improvement outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(3), 272–298.
Southworth, G. (2003). Primary school leadership in context: leading small, medium and large sized schools. London: Taylor and Francis.
Stegö, N.E., Gielen, K., Glatter, R. & Hord, S.M. (Hrsg.). (1987). The role of school leaders in school improvement. Leuven: ACCO.
Teddlie, C. & Stringfield, S. (1993). Schools make a difference. New York: Teachers College Press.
Trider, D. & Leithwood, K.A. (1988). Influences on principal’s practices. Curriculum Inquiry, 18(3), 289–311.
Tringham, K. (2007). Education gazette, 86(11). See http://www.edgazette.gov.nz
Van de Grift, W. & Houtveen, A.A.M. (1999). Educational leadership and pupil achievement in primary education. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 10(4), 373–389.
van Velzen, W.G. (1979). Autonomy of the school. S’Hertogenkosch: PKC.
van Velzen, W. (1985). Making school improvement work. Leuven, Belgium: ACCO.
Walace Foundation, Leithwood, Seashore Louis, Anderson and Wahlstrom (2004).
Weil et al. (1984). Effective and typical schools: how different are they? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, 1984 April.
Weiner, B. (1980). Human motivation. NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Witziers, B., Bosker, R. & Kruger, M. (2003). Educational leadership and student achievement: the elusive search for an association. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 398–425.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Huber, S.G., Muijs, D. (2010). School Leadership Effectiveness: The Growing Insight in the Importance of School Leadership for the Quality and Development of Schools and Their Pupils. In: Huber, S. (eds) School Leadership - International Perspectives. Studies in Educational Leadership, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3501-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3501-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3500-4
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3501-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)