Skip to main content

Individual Particles, Properties and Quantum Statistics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
EPSA Philosophical Issues in the Sciences

Abstract

It is often held that the peculiar statistical behaviour of quantum particles is due to their non-individuality. In this paper, a new suggestion is put forward: quantum particles are individuals, and the distinctive features of quantum statistics are determined solely by the fact that all the properties it describes are emergent relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example, by allowing relations to individuate, as in (Saunders 2006a) and (Muller and :̧def :̧def Saunders 2008).

  2. 2.

    And, crucially, transitions from symmetric to anti-symmetric states (or vice versa) are ruled out.

  3. 3.

    It could be argued that these non-reducible properties are dispositions, but this is immaterial to the treatment of quantum statistics that I wish to illustrate here.

  4. 4.

    The ‘has’ should, of course, not be understood in the sense that there are definite properties before measurement, but just as a generic description. For present purposes, the issue concerning the exact interpretation of quantum properties can be left open.

  5. 5.

    When exactly interaction gives rise to such many-particle systems, on the other hand, does not seem to be an issue that should be settled here. As a matter of fact it appears that it cannot be settled here, if only because ultimately connected to the infamous measurement problem. The connected question whether reality ultimately consists of a unique ‘universe-whole’ can also be left open for the time being.

  6. 6.

    I wish to thank the audience in Madrid for their useful questions and comments. An expanded version of this paper can be found in Morganti (2009).

References

  • Belousek DW (2000) Statistics, symmetry, and the conventionality of indistinguishability in quantum mechanics. Found Phys 30:1–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Born M (1926) Quantenmechanik der stoßvorgänge. Zeitschrift für Physik 38:803–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French S, Krause D (2006) Identity in physics: a historical, philosophical, and formal analysis. Oxford University Press, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huggett N (1997) Identity, quantum mechanics and common sense. Monist 80:118–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huggett N (1999) Atomic metaphysics. J Philos 96:5–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morganti M (2009) Inherent Properties and Statistics with Individual Particles in Quantum Mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40:223–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller FA, Saunders S (2008) Discerning fermions. Br J Philos Sci 59:499–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redhead M (1975) Symmetry in intertheory relations. Synthèse 32:77–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redhead M, Teller P (1991) Particles, particle labels, and quanta. The toll of unacknowledged metaphysics. Found Phys 21:43–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redhead M, Teller P (1992) Particle-labels and the theory of indistinguishable particles in quantum mechanics. Br J Philos Sci 43:201–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders S (2006a) Are quantum particles objects? Analysis 66:52–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders S (2006b) On the explanation for quantum statistics. Stud Hist Philos Modern Phys 37:192–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teller P (1986) Relational holism and quantum mechanics. Br J Philos Sci 37:71–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Teller P (1989) Relativity, relational holism, and the Bell inequalities. In: Cushing J, McMullin E (eds) Philosophical consequences of quantum theory: reflections on Bell’s theorem. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN, pp 208–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Teller P (1998) Quantum mechanics and haecceities. In: Castellani E (ed) Interpreting bodies: classical and quantum objects in modern physics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 114–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Teller P, Redhead M (2000) Is indistinguishability in quantum mechanics conventional? Found Phys 30:951–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo Morganti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Morganti, M. (2010). Individual Particles, Properties and Quantum Statistics. In: Suárez, M., Dorato, M., Rédei, M. (eds) EPSA Philosophical Issues in the Sciences. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3252-2_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics