Skip to main content

A Cohort Perspective on Changes in Family, Fertility Behaviour and Attitudes

  • Chapter
The Fertility Transition in Iran: Revolution and Reproduction
  • 744 Accesses

Chapters 6 and 7 have shed light on family planning use as the main proximate determinant of fertility. However, given the fact that the onset of fertility decline occurred a few years before the revival of the official family planning program in 1989 and the evidence of use both traditional and modern methods of contraception by a significant minority of women in the years when the official family planning program was dormant, the question arises as to whether other factors such as social change and transformation of attitudes toward family and fertility paved the way for the later success of the family planning program and the phenomenal fertility decline in Iran in recent years. In other words, despite the contribution of the family planning program to an acceleration of the fertility decline during the later 1980s, the program itself can be considered to be a response to the demand for smaller family size observed before the mid-1980s. There is evidence of profound shifts in attitudes toward family-related behaviours in much of the world (Thornton and Freedman 1982; Morgan and Waite 1987) and evidence suggests that changing attitudes toward family life have played a pivotal role in demographic trends (Thornton and Freedman 1982; Thornton 1989; Axinn and Thornton 1993; Thornton and Young-Demarco 2001). This chapter aims to examine women's reproductive behaviour as well as attitudes toward family and fertility in Iran. The focus of the present chapter will be on four selected provinces of Gilan, Sistan & Baluchistan, West Azarbaijan and Yazd covered in the 2002 Iran Fertility Transition Survey. Among the questions to be addressed are: How do women in contemporary Iran perceive marriage and childbearing? How do these attitudes vary across regions and social groups? Have attitudes of women towards marriage, family and childbearing changed across time? If so, how far have these changes contributed to the fertility decline in Iran? More importantly, if attitudes have changed, how and why did they change? Drawing on the IFTS data, it is argued here that the Iranian fertility decline has been due to social change at both the macro (societal) and micro (family/individual) levels.

An earlier version of this chapter appeared as the ANU Working Papers in Demography No. 88, and a later version appeared as a book Chapter. See Abbasi-Shavazi et al. (2003), and Abbasi-Shavazi et al. (2008a).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Abbasi-Shavazi et al. (2008b) for a detailed analysis of consanguinity in Iran using IFTS data.

  2. 2.

    The question asked if the couple lived for at least one month with one of their husband's or their own relatives after marriage. If so, then they should choose options one to three accordingly, otherwise they should choose the ‘none’ category. Thus, the high prevalence of living with relatives shown in the table does not necessarily imply a long period of co-residence with relatives after marriage.

  3. 3.

    The question by asking ‘ever’ would be answered in the affirmative by women who had only one experience during their marriage. The impression gained from the responses may tend therefore to exaggerate the incidence of violence within marriage. Nevertheless, there were substantial falls in the reported incidence from older to younger cohorts as would be expected if levels of gender equity were improving in association with increased levels of education.

References

  • Abbasi-Shavazi MJ (2000) Effects of marital fertility and nuptiality on fertility transition in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Working Papers in Demography, No. 84, The Australian National University, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbasi-Shavazi MJ, Askari-Nodoushan A (2005) Family changes and fertility decline in Iran: case study in Yazd province, [Persian]. J Soc Sci 25:45–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbasi-Shavazi MJ, McDonald P (2005) National and Provincial-Level Fertility Trends in Iran, 1972–2000. Working Paper in Demography No. 94. Australian National University, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbasi-Shavazi MJ, McDonald P (2007) Family change in Iran: religion, revolution, and the state. In: Jayakody R, Thornton A, Axinn W (eds) International family change: ideational perspectives. Taylor and Francis Group, LLC, Boca Raton, FL, pp 177–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbasi-Shavazi MJ, Sadeghi R (2005) Ethnicity and family patterns in Iran [Persian]. Women Stud [Pazhuhis-i zanan] 3(1):25–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbasi-Shavazi MJ, McDonald P, Hosseini-Chavoshi M (2008a) Social change and the family in post-revolutionary Iran. In: Kathryn M Yount, Hoda Rashad (eds) Family ties and ideals: portraits of continuity and change in Egypt, Iran, and Tunisia. Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, Routledge, pp 217–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbasi-Shavazi MJ, McDonald P, Hosseini-Chavoshi M (2008b) Modernization and the cultural practice of consanguineous marriage in Iran. J Biosoc Sci 40(4):911–933

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbasi-Shavazi MJ, Morgan P, McDonald P, Hosseini-Chavoshi M (2009) Family change and continuity in Iran: contraceptive use before first pregnancy. J Marriage Fam [forthcoming]

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbasi-Shavazi MJ, McDonald P, Hosseini-Chavoshi M (2003) Changes in family, fertility behavior and attitudes in Iran. Working Paper in Demography No. 88, Australian National University, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbasi-Shavazi MJ, Mehryar A, Jones G, McDonald P (2002) Revolution, war and modernization: population policy and fertility change in Iran. J Popul Res 19(1):25–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axinn WG, Thornton A (1993) Mothers, children, and cohabitation: the intergenerational effects of attitudes and behavior. Am Sociol Rev 58:233–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Givens PB, Hirschman C (1994) Modernization and consanguineous marriage in Iran. J Marriage Fam 56 (November), 820–834

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode WJ (1963) World revolution and family patterns. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoodfar H, Assadpour S (2000) The politics of population policy in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Stud Fam Plann 31(1):19–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketabi A (2000) Marriage with close relatives in ancient Iran [Perisan]. J Soc Sci 16:167–192

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald P (1994) Families in developing countries: Idealised morality and theories of family change. In Cho, L. & Yada, M. (eds) Tradition and Change in the Asian Family. East-West Center, Honolulu, pp. 19–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan SP, Waite LJ (1987) Parenthood and the attitudes of young adults. Am Sociol Rev 52:541–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindfuss RR, Morgan SP (1983) Marriage, sex, and the first birth interval: The quiet revolution in Asia. Population and Development Review, 9:259–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saadat M, Ansari-Lari M, Farhud DD (2004) Consanguineous marriage in Iran. Annals of Human Biology 31(2):263–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sewell WH (1992) A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. Am J Sociology 98:1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sewell WH (2005) Logics of history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton A (2001) The developmental paradigm, reading history sideways, and family change. Demography 38(4):449–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton A (2005) Reading history sideways. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton A, Chang JS, Lin HS (1994) From arranged marriage to love match. In: Thornton A, Lin H (eds) Social change and the family in Taiwan. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 148–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton A (1994) Truncation bias. In: Thornton A, Lin H (eds) Social change and the family in Taiwan. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 148–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton A, Lin H (1994) Social change and the family in Taiwan. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton A (1989) Changing attitudes toward family issues in the United States. J Marriage Fam 51:873–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton A, Young-Demarco L (2001) Four decades of trends in attitudes toward family issues in the United States: the 1960s through 1990s. J Marriage Fam 63:1009–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton A, Freedman D (1982) Changing attitudes toward marriage and single life. Fam Plann Perspect 14(6):297–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torabi F (2006) Social, cultural and demographic aspects of relative marriage in Iran. MA thesis in Demography, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsuya NO, Mason KO (1995) Changing gender roles and below-replacement fertility in Japan. In: Mason KO, Jensen AM (eds) Gender and family change in industrialized countries. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 138–167

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2009). A Cohort Perspective on Changes in Family, Fertility Behaviour and Attitudes. In: The Fertility Transition in Iran: Revolution and Reproduction. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3198-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics