Skip to main content

Backcasting Using Principles for Implementing Cradle-to-Cradle

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Facilitating Sustainable Innovation through Collaboration

Abstract

This chapter explores the strategic implementation of the cradle-to-cradle concept and suggests backcasting using sustainability principles as a systematic way to support decision-makers. The cradle to cradle concept seeks to learn from nature and to design using principles that emphasize the conversion of waste into food, the use of solar energy inputs, and the celebration of diversity. As such, it facilitates organizational transition toward enabling a societal infrastructure by participating in cyclical supply chains – a valuable complement to the green supply chain approach to organizational collaboration for sustainability. The specific contribution of this chapter to the cradle-to-cradle literature focuses on the integration of cradle-to-cradle design within a systems approach that permits analysis from a strategic sustainable development perspective. After usefully comparing cradle-to-cradle design principles with FSSD principles for sustainability, the authors integrate science-based principles with value-based principles as an asset to support backcasting using overarching sustainability constraints drawn from scientific principles for socio-economic sustainability. This framework is one that decision-makers can use flexibly to make mid-course corrections in the march toward a societal infrastructure that supports a targeted system in which all material flows are either part of a biological or a technical metabolism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This framework is published in many books, case studies and peer-reviewed journals within the field. It is often known amongst business leaders and policy-makers as The Natural Step Framework after the international non-profit organization that helped initiate its development and which continues to promote the strategic sustainable development approach.

  2. 2.

    Such as Natural Capitalism, Factor X, Ecological Footprinting, Life Cycle Assessment and Sustainable Technology Development.

  3. 3.

    Whistler was awarded the “best long term planning” award at the 2005 United Nations Liveable Communities Awards in LaCarna, Spain.

References

  • Benyus, J. M. (2002). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature. New York: Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broman, G., Holmberg, J., & Robèrt, K. H. (2000). Simplicity without reduction: Thinking upstream towards the sustainable society. Interfaces: International Journal of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences, 30(3), 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld, J. R. (1997). Industrial ecology: A framework for product and process design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 5(1–2), 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (2004). From complex regions to complex worlds. Ecology and Society, 9(1):11. [Online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss1/art11

  • Holmberg, J., & Robert. K. H. (2000). Backcasting from non-overlapping sustainability principles a framework for strategic planning. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 7(4), 291–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen, J. (2002). The dominant economics paradigm and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9, 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, W. (1998). Essay: A centennial sermon: Design, ecology, ethics, and the making of things. Perspecta, 29, 78–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002a). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. New York: North Point Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002b). Design for the triple top line: New tools for sustainable commerce. Corporate Environmental Strategy, 9(3), 251–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., & Randers, J. (1992). Beyond the limits: Confronting global collapse, envisioning a sustainable future. Post Mills, VT: Chelsea Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ny, H., MacDonald, J., Broman, G., Yamamoto, R., & Robèrt, K.-H. (2006). Sustainability constraints as system boundaries an approach to making life-cycle management strategic. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 10(1–2), 61–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robèrt, K. H. (2000). Tools and concepts for sustainable development, how do they relate to a general framework for sustainable development and to each other. Journal of Cleaner Production 8(3), 243–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robèrt, K. H., Broman, G., Waldron, D., Ny, H., Hallstedt, S., Cook, D., et al. (2004). Strategic leadership towards sustainability. Karlskrona: BlekingeTekniska Högskola.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robèrt, K. H., Schmidt-Bleek, B., Aloisi de Larderel, J., Basile, G., Jansen, J. L., Kuehr, R., et al. (2002). Strategic sustainable development selection, design and synergies of applied tools. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10, 197–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. B. (1988). Unlearning and backcasting: Rethinking some of the questions we ask about the future. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 33, 325–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. B. (1990). Futures under glass: A recipe for people who hate to predict. Futures, 22(8), 820–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, D. (2008). Applications of the FSSD. Lecture slides from a presentation to graduate students at the BlekingeTekniska Högskola, December 9, 2008, Karlskrona, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the support of our advisors, HenrikNy and Pong Leung, classmates, the Master’s in Strategic Leadership toward Sustainability (MSLS) program team, Dr. Karl-Henrik Robèrt and all our interviewees, both while visiting the Netherlands, in person and through conference calls.

A special remark goes to the cooperation of Enviu – Innovators in sustainability! represented by the enthusiastic support of Wouter Kersten. We would finally like to thank representatives from the Province of Limburg, especially for the energy of Frederieke Vriends and the commitment of Paul Levels and Joey Clark.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Freek van der Pluijm .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van der Pluijm, F., Miller, K.M., Cuginotti, A. (2010). Backcasting Using Principles for Implementing Cradle-to-Cradle. In: Sarkis, J., Cordeiro, J., Vazquez Brust, D. (eds) Facilitating Sustainable Innovation through Collaboration. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3159-4_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics