Skip to main content

Ontogenesis and Changes of the Landscape: A Probabilistic View

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ecology, Cognition and Landscape
  • 1365 Accesses

Abstract

In the second chapter, I distinguished at least three possible approaches to understanding the landscape: the Individual-Based Perceptional Landscape (IBPL), the Individual-Based Cognitive Landscape (IBCL), and the Neutrality-Based Landscape (NBL). These three different perspectives generate processes and patterns that can be perceived moving around. If these perspectives are indicators of real processes and related patterns, we can expect to see some results in a higher-rank meta-domain. The idea that the landscape is a space in which relationships and interactions happen, or is the geography of every domain, is common to all three visions. In other words, the space is the container in which complexity happens continuously. This complexity embarrasses our science which is based more on separate parts than on relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, T.F.H. and Hoekstra, T.W. 1992. Toward a unified theory. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T.F.H. and Starr, T.B. 1982. Hierarchy perspectives for ecological complexity. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers, P. 1998. Complexity & postmodernism. Understanding complex systems. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farina, A. 2000. Landscape ecology in action. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farina, A. and Belgrano, A. 2004. The eco-field: A new paradigm for landscape ecology. Ecological Research 19:107–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farina, A., Bogaert, J., and Schipani, I. 2005. Cognitive landscape and information: New perspectives to investigate the ecological complexity. BioSystem 79:235–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C.S. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4:1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S.A. 1993. The origins of the order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, R. 1999. Complexity. Life at the edge of chaos. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manson, S.M. 2001. Simplifying complexity: A review of complexity theory. Geoforum 32: 405–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monod, J. 1970. Il caso e la necessità. Mondadori, Milano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morowitz, H.J. 2002. The emergence of everything. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, H.T. 1983. System ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, R.T. 2002. A conversation on refining the concept of keystone species. Conservation Biology 9: 962–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J.D. 1999. Divergence, convergence, and self-organization in landscapes. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 89(3): 466–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I. 1961. Introduction to thermodynamics of irreversible processes. John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stonier, T. 1990. Information and the internal structure of the universe. An exploration into information physics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stonier, T. 1996. Information as a basic property of the universe. BioSystems 38: 135–140.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.N., Reichman, O.J., Morin, P.J., Polis, G.A., Power, M.E., Sterner, R.W., Couch, C.A., Gough, L., Holt, R., Hooper, D.U., Keesing, F., Lovell, C.R., Milne, B.T., Moles, M.C., Roberts, D.W., and Strauss, S.Y. 2001. Frontiers of ecology. Bioscience 51: 15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D., May, R.M., Lehman, C.L., and Nowak, M.A. 1994. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371:65–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, T. and Bruggemann, R. 2000. Goal function for the development of natural systems. Ecological Modeling 132: 231–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Almo Farina .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Farina, A. (2009). Ontogenesis and Changes of the Landscape: A Probabilistic View. In: Ecology, Cognition and Landscape., vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3138-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics