Skip to main content

Philosophy and Engineering: Setting the Stage

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Philosophy and Engineering:

Part of the book series: Philosophy of Engineering and Technology ((POET,volume 2))

Abstract

Philosophical inquiries into technology are still rare and most investigations are of a recent nature. This contribution introduces a number of general themes that are investigated in the volume Philosophy and Engineering. It pays attention to the difference between philosophy of technology and philosophy of engineering, discusses possible definitions of engineering and the relation between science, technology and engineering. An inventory of philosophical issues in engineering is offered and attention is paid to how engineers and philosophers can cooperate to make the new area of philosophy of engineering a success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    In biology, a deme is another word for a local population of organisms of one species that actively interbreed with one another and share a distinct gene pool. If demes are isolated for a long time they can become distinct subspecies or species. Definition from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deme_(biology).

  2. 2.

    Note that engineering activities like inspection, research, etc. do not produce technology, but still may be said to have technology as the object.

References

  • Achterhuis, A., ed. 2001. American philosophy of technology: The empirical turn. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. 1998. Thinking like an engineer. Studies in the ethics of a profession. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. 2005. Engineering ethics: The international library of essays in public and professional ethics. Aldershot, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franssen, M. 2005. Arrow’s theorem, multi-criteria decision problems and multi-attribute preferences in engineering design. Research in Engineering Design 16: 42–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C.E., Pritchard, M.S. and Rabins, M.J. 2008. Engineering ethics: Concepts and cases. 4th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houkes, W.N. 2006. Knowledge of artefact functions. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37(1): 102–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura, Y., Yusuke, K., and Riichiro, M. 2006. An ontological model of device function: industrial deployment and lessons learned. Applied Ontology 1(3–4): 237–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koen, B. 2003. Discussion of the method. Conducting the engineer’s approach to problem solving. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroes, P. and Meijers, A., eds. 2000. The empirical turn in the philosophy of technology. Vol. 20, Research in the Philosophy of technology. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M.W. and Schinzinger, R. 2005. Ethics in engineering. 4th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitcham, C. 1994. Thinking through technology. The path between engineering and philosophy. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Poel, I. 2001. Investigating ethical issues in engineering design. Science and Engineering Ethics 7(3): 429–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Poel, I. 2005. Engineering design ethics. In Encyclopedia of Science, Technology, and Ethics, edited by C. Mitcham. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Poel, I. 2007. Methodological problems in QFD and directions for future development. Research in Engineering Design 18: 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermaas, P.E. and Dorst, K. 2006. On the conceptual framework of John Gero’s FBS-model and the prescriptive aims of design methodology Design Studies 28(2): 133–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesilind, P.A. and Gunn, A. 1998. Engineering, ethics, and the environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The editors want to thank Saskia Polder for her invaluable editorial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van de Poel, I. (2009). Philosophy and Engineering: Setting the Stage. In: Poel, I., Goldberg, D. (eds) Philosophy and Engineering:. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2804-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics