Abstract
Perrin’s experiments on Brownian motion left little room for reasonable doubt about the existence of molecules. They provided independent support for the statistical fluctuations that had been postulated by proponents of the kinetic theory and they gave direct support to two basic assumptions of that theory, the randomness of the molecular motions via the motions of the Brownian particles that they jostled, and the equipartition of energy for motions of translation and rotation. Three methods for calculating Avogadro’s number were in agreement with each other and with estimates acquired by other means. The kinetic theory was not confirmed in an unqualified way. It became increasingly clear that violations of the equipartition of energy constituted a problem that could not be solved without a drastic modification in the fundamentals of the theory. The challenge around the time of Perrin’s experiments was to clarify what the kinetic theory got right and what it got wrong. Perrin was able to show that it got things right to an extent that it became unreasonable to doubt the existence of molecules.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chalmers, A. (2009). Experimental Contact with Molecules. In: The Scientist’s Atom and the Philosopher’s Stone. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 279. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2362-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2362-9_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2361-2
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2362-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)