Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spatial Distribution of Toxic Release Inventory Sites in Chicago Area: Is There Environmental Inequity?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Geospatial Techniques in Urban Hazard and Disaster Analysis

Part of the book series: Geotechnologies and the Environment ((GEOTECH,volume 2))

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine if “environmental inequity” can be associated with the spatial distribution of Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) facilities in the Chicago area. The chapter examines whether neighborhoods with minority concentrations or lower-income residents experience disproportionate exposure to facilities that release toxic emissions into the environment. Demographic information is extracted from 2000 Census data, and facility data are based on the 2004 Environmental Protection Agency’s Toxic Release Inventory. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is used to create “buffers” of various spatial extent around the facilities. Statistical analysis (including t-tests and regressions) is conducted to examine whether areas within the buffers are significantly more likely to consist of minority and low-income residents and households than areas outside the buffers. Results indicate that at both the census tract and block group levels, Hispanic and non-white classes as well as low-income residents are more likely to be located within the buffers. Therefore, this study corroborates earlier research findings that minority and low-income groups are disproportionately exposed to environmental hazards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderton, D.L., Anderson, A.B., Oakes, J.M., and Fraser, M.R. (1994). Environmental equity: The demographics of dumping. Demography 31: 229–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora, S. and Cason, N. (1999). Do community characteristics influence environmental outcomes? Evidence from the toxics release inventory. Southern Economic Journal 65: 691–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baden, B.M., and Coursey, D.L. (2002). The locality of waste sites within the City of Chicago: A demographic, social, and economic analysis. Resource and Energy Economics 24: 53–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, S.A., Eichenthal, D.R., Espinosa, R., Heidinger, T.E., Hogan III, W.C., Levin, M.R., Maude, J.L., Niemi, P., O’Donnell, M., and Wolfberg, M.L. (1983). Latinos in Metropolitan Chicago: A Study of Housing and Employment. Chicago: Latino Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolin, B, Matranga, E., Hackett, E.J. Sadalla, E.K., Pijawka, K.D., Brewer, D., and Sicotte, D. (2000). Environmental equity in a sunbelt city: The spatial distribution of toxic hazards in Phoenix, Arizona. Environmental Hazards 2: 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boone, C.G. and Modarres, A. (1999). Creating a toxic neighborhood in Los Angeles county: A historical examination of environmental inequity. Urban Affairs Review 35: 163–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, W.A., Salling, M.J., Haynes, K.E. and Cyran, EJ. (1995). Toward environmental justice: Spatial equity in Ohio and Cleveland. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 85: 641–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, W.M. and Wells, M.V. (2002). The politics and reality of environmental justice: A history and considerations for public administrators and policy makers. Public Administration Review: 62: 688–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, R.D. (1990). Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality. Boulder, Co: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, R.D. and Johnson, G.S. (2000). Environmental justice: Grassroots activism and its impact on public policy decision making. Journal of Social Issues, 56: 555–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, L.W. and Foster, S.R. (2001). From the Ground Up: Environmental Racism and the Rise of the Environmental Justice Movement. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colten, C.E. (1985). Industrial wastes in the Calumet area, 1869 – 1970: An historical geography. Champaign, IL: Hazardous Waste Research and Information Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Environmental Justice, Institute of Medicine (CEJ). (1999). Toward Environmental Justice: Research, Education, and Health Policy Needs. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronon, W. (1991). Nature’s metropolis: Chicago and the Great West. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolinoy, D.C. and Miranda, M.L. (2004). GIS modeling of air toxics releases from TRI reporting and non-TRI-reporting facilities: Impacts for environmental justice. Environmental Health Perspectives 112: 1717–1724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 2008a. “What is the Origin of Environmental Justice at EPA?” Environmental Justice: Frequently Asked Questions, http://www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/faqs/ej/index.html, last updated February 5. Accessed September 6, 2008.

  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 2008b. “How Does EPA Define Environmental Justice?” Environmental Justice: Frequently Asked Questions, http://www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/faqs/ej/index.html, last updated February 5. Accessed September 6, 2008.

  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 2008c. TRI Explorer. Chemical Report. http://www.epa.gov/triexplorer/, last updated July 23. Accessed September 6, 2008.

  • Faber, D. and McCarthy, D. (2001). The evolving structure of the environmental justice movement in the United States: New models for democratic decision-making. Social Justice Research 14: 405–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham, A.S. and Wong, D.W.S. (1991). The modifiable areal unit problem in multivariate statistical analysis. Environment and Planning A 23: 1025–1044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fricker, Jr., R.D. and Hengartner, N.W. (2001). Environmental equity and the distribution of toxic release inventory and other environmentally undesirable sites in metropolitan New York City. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 8: 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasmeier, A.K. and Farrigan, T.L. (November 2003). Poverty, sustainability, and the culture of despair: Can sustainable development strategies support poverty alleviation in America’s most environmentally challenged communities? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 590: 131–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glickman, T.S. (2004). Evaluating equity in Alleghany County. New York: Program for the Human Environment, Rockefeller University. Available at http://phe.rockefeller.edu/comm_risk/commrsk3.html [accessed May 2, 2007]

  • Harner, J., Warner, K., Pierce, J., and Huber, T. (2002). Urban environmental justice indices. The Professional Geographer 54: 318–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hite, D. (2000). A random utility model of environmental equity. Growth and Change 31: 40–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, H. (1933). One Hundred Years of Land Values in Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, L.M. (2000). The spatial association between US immigrant residential concentration and environmental hazards. International Migration Review 34: 460–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, W.A. and Mathur, A. (2003). Environmental justice and information technologies: Overcoming the information-access paradox in urban communities. Public Administration Review 63: 573–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle, M. and Coyle, M. (1992). Unequal protection: The racial divide in environmental law. National Law Journal 15: S1–S12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurian, L. (2003). A prerequisite for participation: Environmental knowledge and what residents know about local toxic sites. Journal of Planning Education and Research 22: 257–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mennis, J. (2002). Using geographic information systems to create and analyze statistical surfaces of population and risk for environmental justice analysis. Social Science Quarterly 83: 281–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, Jr., M., Sadd, J., and Hipp, J. (2001). Which came first? Toxic facilities, minority move-in, and environmental justice. Journal of Urban Affairs 23: 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, Jr., M., Sadd, J.L., and Morello-Frosch, R. (2004). Waiting to exhale: The demographics of toxic air release facilities in 21st century California. Social Science Quarterly 85: 420–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellow, D.N. (2004). The politics of illegal dumping: An environmental justice framework. Qualitative Sociology 27: 511–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellow, D.N., Weinberg, A., and Schnaiberg, A. (2001). The environmental justice movement: Equitable allocation of the costs and benefits of environmental management outcomes. Social Justice Research 14: 423–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinderhughes, R. (1996). The Impact of Race on Environmental Quality: An Empirical and Theoretical Discussion. Sociological Perspectives 39: 231–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rast, J. (2006). Environmental justice and the new regionalism. Journal of Planning Education and Research 25: 249–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, C.L. and Leigh, N.G. (2000). Planning, urban revitalization, and the inner city: An exploration of structural racism. Journal of Planning Literature 14: 367–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M., Cutter, S.L., Menzel, C., and Ji, M. (1997). Spatial accuracy of the EPA’s environmental hazards databases and their use in environmental equity analysis. Applied Geographic Studies 1: 45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talih, M. and Fricker, Jr., R.D. (2002). Effects of neighborhood demographic shifts on findings of environmental injustice: A New York City case study. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 165: 375–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Towers, G. (2000). Applying the political geography of scale: Grassroots strategies and environmental justice. Professional Geographer 52: 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice (UCCCRJ). (1987). Toxic Wastes and Race in the United States: A National Report on the Racial and Socio-Economic Characteristics of Communities with Hazardous Waste Sites. New York: United Church of Christ.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Census Bureau (2008a). Race Data. Recommendations from the Interagency Committee for the Review of the Racial and Ethnic Standards to the Office of Management and Budget Concerning Changes to the Standards for the Classification of Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity. http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/race/Directive_15.html, last updated April 10. Accessed March 24, 2008.

  • US Census Bureau (2008b). United States Census 2000. Your Gateway to Census 2000. http://www.census.gov/main/www/cen2000.html, last updated April 24. Accessed September 6, 2008.

  • US General Accounting Office (USGAO). (1983). Siting of Hazardous Waste Landfills and Their Correlation with Racial and Economic Status of Surrounding Communities. Washington, DC: GAO/RCED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S-S. 2006. Incorporating GIS and Remote Sensing for Census Population Disaggregation. ETD Collection for Texas State University. Paper AAI3221522. http://ecommons.txstate.edu/dissertations/AAI3221522

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography and Anthropology, Louisiana State University, 70803, Baton Rouge, LA, USA

    Fahui Wang

  2. Department of Geography, Northern Illinois University, 60115, DeKalb, IL, USA

    Yvette C. Feliberty

Authors
  1. Fahui Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yvette C. Feliberty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fahui Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. Geography, Texas State University, University Drive 601, San Marcos, 78666-4616, U.S.A.

    Pamela S. Showalter

  2. Dept. Geography, Texas State University, University Drive 601, San Marcos, 78666-4616, U.S.A.

    Yongmei Lu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wang, F., Feliberty, Y.C. (2009). Spatial Distribution of Toxic Release Inventory Sites in Chicago Area: Is There Environmental Inequity?. In: Showalter, P., Lu, Y. (eds) Geospatial Techniques in Urban Hazard and Disaster Analysis. Geotechnologies and the Environment, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2238-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation