Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

De casus is de basis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neuropsychologische casuïstiek

  • 3836 Accesses

Samenvatting

In dit hoofdstuk betoog ik dat onze ideeën over neuropsychologische stoornissen zoals afasie, agnosie, apraxie en amnesie vooral gebaseerd zijn op beschrijvingen van patiënten met specifieke uitvalsverschijnselen. Van de klassieke oudheid tot de renaissance kennen we geschriften waarin dergelijke patiëntbeschrijvingen voorkomen en waarbij we de neuropsychologische beelden kunnen herkennen. Ook het werk van Broca, Wernicke, Lissauer en Liepmann is op gevalsbeschrijvingen gebaseerd. In het moderne onderzoek spelen gevalsbeschrijvingen een cruciale rol. De niet geringe bijdrage van de Engelse neuropsychologe Elisabeth Warrington is vrijwel volledig gebaseerd op gevalsbeschrijvingen. Er is wel gesteld dat onderzoek naar specifieke cognitieve aandoeningen eigenlijk alleen goed gedaan kan worden bij individuele patiënten. Die stelling bevat een kern van waarheid, maar ook groepsstudies kunnen een zinvolle bijdrage leveren. Het is echter belangrijk om bij dat onderzoek, zowel van symptomen als van behandelingen, gebruik te maken van goede onderzoeksdesigns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatuur

  • APA. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. (DSM-5) (5th ed.). Washington: American Psychiatric Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, D., & Hersen, M. (1976). Single case experimental design. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R. (1992). Mental lives. Case studies in cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R., & Conway, M. (1995). Broken memories. Case studies in memory impairment. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza, A., & McCloskey, M. (1988). The case for single-patient studies. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 517–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Code, C., Wallesch, C., Joanette, Y., & Lecours, A. R. (1996). Classic cases in neuropsychology. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Code, C., Wallesch, C., Joanette, Y., & Lecours, A. R. (2002). Classic cases in neuropsychology (Vol. 2). Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. F., & Mapou, R. L. (1988). Neuropsychological assessment for treatment planning: A hypothesis-testing approach. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 3, 12–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corkin, S. (2013). Permanent tegenwoordige tijd. Het onvergetelijke leven van de man die zijn geheugen verloor. Amsterdam: Prometheus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draaisma, D. (2006). Ontregelde geesten. Groningen: Historische Uitgeverij.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugard, P., Portia, F., & Todman, J. (2011). Single case and small n-designs: A practical guide to randomization tests (2nd ed.). Routledge: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eling, P. (2011). Lichtheim’s golden shot. Cortex, 47(4), 501–508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Funell, E. (2000). Case studies in the neuropsychology of reading. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, G. (2013). Apraxia: The cognitive side of motor control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, G. (1999). Case studies in the neuropsychology of vision. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, N. (1997). Injured brains of medical minds: Views from within. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. (1982). Single case research designs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1987a). The mind of a mnemonist: A little book about a vast memory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1987b). The man with a shattered world: The history of a brain wound. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luzzatti, C., & Whitaker, H. (1995). Johannes Schenck and Johannes Jakob Wepfer: Clinical and anatomical observations in the prehistory of neurolinguistics. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 9, 157–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macmillan, M. (2000). An odd kind of fame. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J., Baron, I. S., & Ricker, J. H. (2011). Casebook of clinical neuropsychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, J. (2005). Fractured minds: A case-study approach to clinical neuropsychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkin, A. (1997). Case studies in the neuropsychology of memory. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomata, G (2010). Sharing cases: The observationes in early modern medicine. Early Science and Medicine, 15/3, 193–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarton, G. (1931). Book review: The Edwin Smith surgical papyrus by James Henry breasted. Isis, 15, 355–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M., & Dell, G. (2010). Case series investigations in cognitive neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27, 477–494.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shallice, T., & Cooper, R. P. (Eds.). (2011). The organization of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tate R., McDonald, S., Perdices, M., Togher, L., Schultz, R., & Savage, S. (2008). Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 18, 385–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tate R., McDonald, S., Perdices, M., Rosenkoetter, U., Wakim, D., Godbee, K., Togher, L., & McDonald, S. (2013). Revision of a method of quality rating scale for single-case experimental designs and n-of-1 trials: The 15-item Risk of Bias in N-of-1 Trials (RoBiNT) Scale. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 23, 619–638.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zurif, E., Swinney, D., & Fodor, J. (1991). An evaluation of assumptions underlying the single-patient-only position in neuropsychological research: A reply. Brain and Cognition, 16, 198–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Paul Eling

Authors
  1. Paul Eling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Koninklijke Visio, Geleen, The Netherlands

    J.A.M. Vandermeulen

  2. Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands

    M.M.A. Derix

Copyright information

© 2015 Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eling, P. (2015). De casus is de basis. In: Vandermeulen, J., Derix, M. (eds) Neuropsychologische casuïstiek. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Houten. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-0417-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-0417-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Houten

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-368-0416-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-368-0417-2

  • eBook Packages: Dutch language eBook collection

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation