Skip to main content

Dynamic MRI and the Assessment of Activity

  • Chapter
Imaging of Perianal Inflammatory Diseases
  • 1309 Accesses

Abstract

Paramagnetic contrast administration is routinely used in the evaluation of perianal disease in order to detect the presence of active inflammation within fistula tracts as well as abscesses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Spencer JA, Ward J, Beckingham IJ et al. (1996) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of perianal fistulas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167:735–741

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Morris J, Spencer JA, Ambrose NS (2000) MR imaging classification of perianal fistulas and its implications for patients management. Radiographics 20:623–637

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cuenod CA, de Parades V, Siauve N et al. (2003) IRM des suppurations ano-perineales. J Radiol 84:516–528

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dwarkasing S, Hussain SM, Krestin GP (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging of perianal fistulas. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 26:247–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Halligan S, Stoker J (2006) Imaging of fistula in ano. Radiology 239:18–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sun MR, Smith MP, Kane RA (2008) Current techniques in imaging of fistula in ano: three- dimensional endoanal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 29:454–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ziech M, Felt-Bersma R, Stoker J (2009) Imaging of perianal fistulas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7:1037–1045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Horsthuis K, Lavini C, Bipat S et al. (2009) Perianal Crohn disease:evaluation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging as an indicator of disease activity. Radiology 251:380–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Savoye-Collet C, Savoye G, Koning E et al. (2010) Fistulizing perianal Crohn’s disease: contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging assessment at one year on maintenance anti-TNF- alpha therapy. Inflamm Bowel Dis 17(8):1751–1758.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Spalinger J, Patriquin H, Miron MC et al. (2000) Doppler US in patients with Crohn disease: vessel density in the diseased bowel reflects disease activity. Radiology 217:787–791

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mallouhi A, Bonatti H, Peer S et al. (2004) Detection and characterization of perianal inflammatory disease. J Ultrasound Med 23:19–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maconi G, Sampietro GM, Russo A et al. (2002) The vascularity of internal fistulae in Crohn’s disease: an in vivo power Doppler ultrasonography assessment. Gut 50(4):496–500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Villa C, Pompili G, Franceschelli G et al. (2011) Role of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of the activity of perianal Crohn’s disease. Eur J Radiol Feb 10

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bell SJ, Halligan S, Windsor AC et al. (2003) Response of fistulating Crohn’s disease to infliximab treatment assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 17:387-93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Assche G, Vanbeckevoort D, Bielen D et al. (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging of the effects of infliximab on perianal fistulizing Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol 98:332–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ng SC, Plamondon S, Gupta A et al. (2009) Prospective evaluation of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy guided by magnetic resonance imaging for Crohn’s perineal fistulas. Am J Gastroenterol 104:2973–2986

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schwarts DA (2009) Imaging and the treatment of Crohn’s perianal fistulas: to see is to believe. Am J Gastroenterol 104: 2987–2989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Karmiris K, Bielen D, Vanbeckevoort D et al. (2011) Long-term monitoring of infliximab therapy for perianal fistulizing Crohn’s disease by using magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 9:130–136.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Losco A, Vigano C, Conte D et al. (2009) Assessing the activity of perianal Crohn’s disease: comparison of clinical indices and computer-assisted anal ultrasound. Inflamm Bowel Dis 15:742–749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiara Villa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Villa, C. (2013). Dynamic MRI and the Assessment of Activity. In: Tonolini, M., Maconi, G. (eds) Imaging of Perianal Inflammatory Diseases. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2847-0_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2847-0_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2846-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2847-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics