Skip to main content

Riassunto

La senologia è il tipico settore dell’imaging al quale gli aspetti caratterizzanti l’attuale comunicazione si adattano pressoché completamente. Riguarda, infatti, un limitato gruppo di donne sintomatiche, che sono quindi “pazienti” a tutti gli effetti, e un assai più numeroso gruppo di donne asintomatiche che, aderendo ai programmi di prevenzione mediante esami clinico-strumentali completi o mediante screening mammografico (Fig. 11.1), possono essere definite “utenti” [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia

  1. Barreau B, Tastet S (2005) De l’usage des pratiques de communication dans la relation radiologue-patiente en senologie. In: Taourel P, Tardivon A (eds) Imagerie du sein. Société française de radiologie, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  2. Veronesi U, Boyle P, Rilke F (1988) Carcinoma della mammella. Sorbona Edizioni, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  3. Martino G (2006) Informazione-Comunicazione negli studi di prevenzione e diagnosi precoce. In: Modena S (a cura di) Trattato di Senologia. Piccin, Padova, pp. 111–116

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barreau B, Tastet S (2007) L’annonce du diagnostic en sénologie: les techniques de communication. J Radiol 88(2):219–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lorch H, Scherer P (2007) Disclosure of diagnosis in ambulatory radiology practice: expectations of patients and referring physicians. Rofo 179(10):1043–1047

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mammography quality standards act. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Food and Drug Administration (http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Radiation-EmittingProducts/ MammographyQualityStandardsActandProgram/Regulations/ucm110849.pdf)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Giordano L, Webster P, Segnan N, Austoker J (2005) Linee guida europee sulla comunicazione ed informazione nei programmi di screening mammografico. GISMa, Grassina (Firenze)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beck RS, Daughtridge R, Sloane PD (2002) Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review. J Am Board Fam Pract 15(1):25–38

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown RF, Butow PN, Henman M et al (2002) Responding to the active and passive patient: flexibility is the key. Health Expect 5(3):236–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bassett LW, Bomyea K, Liu S, Sayre J (1995) Communication of mammography results to women by radiologists: attitudes of referring health care providers. Radiology 195(1): 235–238

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Leclère J, Ollivier L, Dolbeault S, Neuenschwander S (2006) Dialogue entre le radiologue et le patient atteint d’un cancer. J Radiol 87(2 Pt 1):99–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Leclère J, Ollivier L, Pacault V, Palangié T (1996) La relation médecin-malade en écographie cancérologique. J Radiol 77(6):405–409

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Berlin L (2002) Communicating findings of radiologic examinations: whither goest the radiologist’s duty? AJR Am J Roentgenol 178(4):809–815

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Berlin L (2007) Communicating results of all radiologic examinations directly to patients: has the time come? AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(6):1275–1282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hammond I, Franche RL, Black DM, Gaudette S (1999) The radiologist and the patient: breaking bad news. Can Assoc Radiol J 50(4):233–234

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Harvey JA, Cohen MA, Brenin DR et al (2007) Breaking bad news: a primer for radiologists in breast imaging. J Am Coll Radiol 4(11):800–808

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ragavendra N, Laifer-Narin SL, Melany ML, Grant EG (1998) Disclosure of results of sonographic examinations to patients by sonologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170(6):1423–1425

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hall FM (2009) The radiology report of the future. Radiology 251(2):313–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. The face of radiology. American College of Radiology (http://www.mypatientconnection.com/ Articles/Neimanletter.aspx)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Martino G (2004) Problemi relazionali nel lavoro del TSRM in Senologia. In: Mammografia: tecnica e controlli di qualità. Testo per Tecnici Sanitari di Radiologia Medica. Scuola Italiana di Senologia, Milano (http://www.senologia.it/scuola/tecnica_mammografica_2004.html)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gunderman RB (2005) The golden rule. J Am Coll Radiol 2(1):76–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schiavon, F., Zambrin, E., Piuzzi, M. (2012). La comunicazione in senologia. In: Schiavon, F., Guglielmi, G., Rotondo, A. (eds) La comunicazione radiologica nella società del benessere. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2504-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2504-2_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2503-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2504-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics