Skip to main content

Is It Still Worth Treating At-Risk Patients with Perioperative Goal-Directed Haemodynamic Therapy?

  • Chapter
Practical Issues in Anesthesia and Intensive Care
  • 1119 Accesses

Abstract

The principle behind the belief that Goal-Directed Haemodynamic Therapy (GDHT) is the key to reducing mortality rates, complications and length of stay (LOS) in at-risk patients undergoing surgery (mainly abdominal, chest or vascular surgery for multiple trauma, sepsis and, generally speaking, surgery in which significant blood loss is expected) is that surgical stress can be overcome only with an oxygen delivery index (DO2I) that is adjusted for metabolic requirements (CaO2·CI·10 = ⁥ 600 mL/m2/min). Oxygen supply to tissues may otherwise be insufficient, particularly in certain parts of the body (especially the intestines), and may lead to complications (e.g. chronic paralytic ileus) that in turn trigger other disorders (e.g. tachycardia, hypotension, myocardial ischemia) which at the very least prolong LOS but may even increase mortality rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  1. Boyd O et al (1993) A randomized clinical trial of the effect of deliberate perioperative increase of oxygen delivery on mortality in high risk surgical patients. JAMA 270:2699–2707

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ciofolo MJ (1989) Changes in ventilation, oxygen uptake and CO2 out up during recovery from anesthesia. Anesthesiology 70:737–741

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Conway DH et al (2002) Randomized controlled trial investigating the influence of intravenous fluid filtration using oesophageal Doppler monitoring during bowel surgery. Anaesthesia 57:845–849

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. De Baker D et al (2006) The effects of dobutamine on microcirculatory alterations in patients with septic shock are independent of its systemic effects. Crit Care 34:403–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Durairaj L et al (2008) Fluid therapy in resuscitated sepsis. Chest 133:252–263. Eur J Anaesth 24:1028-1033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gan TJ et al (2002) Goal directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery. Anesthesiology 97:820–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gueret G et al (2007) Comparison of cardiac output measurements between NICO and the pulmonary artery catheter during repeat surgery for total hip replacement. Eur J Anestesial 24:1028–1033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kern JW et al (2002) Meta analysis of hemodynamic optimization in high-risk patients. Crit Care Med 30:1686–1692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee GDJ (1994) The pulmonary circulation. In: Wagner WW, Weir EK, The pulmonary circulation and gas exchange, Futura, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lobo SM et al (2000) Effects of maximizing oxygen delivery on morbidity and mortality in high risk surgical patients. Crit Care Med 28:3396–3404

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lobo SM et al (2006) Prospective, randomized trial comparing fluids and dobutamine optimization of oxygen delivery in high risk surgical patients. Crit Care 10:872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lobo SM et al (2008) Early optimisation of oxygen delivery in high-risk surgical patients. In: Vincente JL (ed), Yearbook of intensive care and emergency medicine, Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mythen MG et al (1995) Perioperative plasma volume expansion reduces the incidence of gut mucosal hypoperfusion during cardiac surgery. Arch Surg 130:423–429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Older P et al (1993) Preoperative evaluation of cardiac failure and ischemia in elderly patients by cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Chest 104:701–704

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Older P et al (1999) Cardiopulmonary exercise testing as a screening test for perioperative management of major surgery in the elderly. Chest 116:355–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pearse RM et al (2006) Identification and characterization of the high risk surgical population in the United Kingdom. Crit Care 10:R81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sageman WS et al (2002) Equivalence of bioimpedance and thermodilution in measuring cardiac index after cardiac surgery. JCVA16:8–14

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shoemaker WC et al (1988) Prospective trial of supranormal values of survivors as therapeutic goals in high risk surgical patients. Chest 94:1176–1186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Silver MB et al (2004) Evaluation of impedance cardiography as an alternative to pulmonary artery catheterization in Critical ill patients. CHF 10(Suppl 2):17–21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sinclair S et al (1997) Intraoperative intravascular volume optimisation and length of stay after repair of proximal femoral fracture: Randomized trial. BMJ 315:909–912

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stone MD et al (2003) Effect of adding dopexamine to intraoperative volume expansion in patients undergoing major elective abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth 91:619–629

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Van De Water J et al (2003) Impedance Cardiography — The next vital sign technology? Chest 123:2028–2033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Venn R et al (2002) Randomized controlled trial to investigate influence of the fluid challenge on duration of hospital stay and perioperative morbidity in patients with hip fractures. Br J Anaesth 88:65–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wilson J et al (1999) Reducing a risk of major elective surgery: randomized controlled trial of preoperative optimisation of oxygen delivery. BMJ 318:1099–1103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Xiaoming J et al (2008) Risk factors for ARDS in patients receiving mechanical ventilation for >48 h. Chest 188:853–861

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yern SJ et al (2003) Sources of error in noninvasive PCBF measurements by partial rebreathing. Anesthesiology 98:881–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Biagio Allaria .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Allaria, B. (2012). Is It Still Worth Treating At-Risk Patients with Perioperative Goal-Directed Haemodynamic Therapy?. In: Allaria, B. (eds) Practical Issues in Anesthesia and Intensive Care. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2460-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2460-1_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2459-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2460-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics