Abstract
In daily routine work clinicians of all specialties must make a variety of decisions, including whose needs and problems to address first, what diagnostic tests to order, what treatments to recommend or institute, how to measure the results of those treatments interventions, how to predict the fate of the patients, and when to stop the diagnostic or therapeutic process. Those challenges and questions are particularly concentrated in the setting of an intensive care unit where the time to make decisions is limited by the acute nature of the underlying diseases, where available information is commonly incomplete, and where the consequences of decisions are frequently of immediate and major importance to the patients. Resuscitating, providing life support, and providing intensive monitoring in a setting of advanced diagnostic and therapeutic technology requires clinicians to rapidly decide who should receive such care, what are the potential alternative management strategies, and what are the risks, benefits and costs of each alternative. In making a final management decision clinicians must also consider patients and relatives’ values and preferences, as well as the societal, cultural, religious, moral, and legal implications of their choices.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Guyatt GH (1991) Evidence-based medicine [editorial]. Ann Internal Medicine 114[Suppl 2]
Sacks HS, Chalmers TC, Smith H Jr (1983) Sensitivity and specificity of clinical trials. Randomized versus historical assignment in controlled clinical trials. Arch Intern Med 143: 753–755
Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG (1995) Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 273:408–412
Mulrow CD, Mulrow JP, Linn WD et al (1988) Relative efficacy of vasodilator therapy in chronic congestive heart failure. JAMA 259:3422–3426
Packer M, Carver JR, Rodeheffer RJ et al (1991) Effect of oral milrinone on mortality in severe chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 325:1468
The EC/IC Bypass Study Group (1985) Failure of extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 313:1191–1200
North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators (1991) Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 325:445–453
Echt DS, Liebson PR, Mitchell LB et al (1991) Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. N Engl J Med 324:781–788
McPherson K (1990) Why do variations occur? In: Anderson TF, Mooney G (eds) The challenges of medical practice variations. Macmillan, London, pp 16–35
Anderson GM, Lomas J (1989) Regionalization of coronary artery bypass surgery: effects on access. Med Care 27:288–296
Antman EM, Lau J, Kupelnick B et al (1992) A comparison of meta-analyses of randomized trial and recommendations of clinical experts: Treatment of myocardial infarction. JAMA 268:240–248
Fahey T, Griffiths S, Peters TJ (1995) Evidence based purchasing: understanding results of clinical trials and systematic reviews. BMJ 311:1056–1060
Naylor CD (1995) Grey zones of clinical practice: Some limits to evidence-based medicine. Lancet 345:840–842
Chalmers I (1983) Scientific inquiry and authoritarianism in perinatal care and education. Birth 10:151–164
Hayward R, Wilson MC, Tunis SR et al and the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (1995) Users’ guides to the medical literature. VIII. How to use clinical practice guidelines. Part A. Are the recommendations valid? JAMA 274:570–574
Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Sinclair J et al (1995) Users’ guides to the medical literature. IX. A Method for grading health care recommendations. JAMA 274:1800–1804
Hope T (1995) Evidence based patient choice. Report to the Anglia and Oxford Health Authority into the use of evidence based information for enhancing patient choice. Anglia and Oxford Regional Health Authority, Oxford
Guyatt GH, Rennie D (1993) Users’ guides to the medical literature: Editorial. JAMA 270: 2096–2097
Sackett DL, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB (1997) Evidence-based medicine. Churchill Livingston, New York
Oxman AD, Sackett DL, Guyatt GH for the Evidence-based Medicine Working Group (1993). Users’ guides to the medical literature. I. How to get started. JAMA 270:2093–2095
Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ for the Evidence-based Medicine Working Group (1993) Users’ guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. Part A. Are the results of the study valid? JAMA 270:2598–2601
Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL for the Evidence-based Medicine Working Group (1994) Users’ guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. Part A. Are the results of the study valid? JAMA 271:389–391
Levine M, Walter S, Lee H et al for the Evidence-based Medicine Working Group (1994) Users’ guides to the medical literature. IV How to use an article about harm. JAMA 271: 1615–1619
Laupacis A, Wells G, Richardson S, Tugwell P for the Evidence-based Medicine Working Group (1994) Users’ guides to the medical literature. V How to use an article about prognosis. JAMA 272:234–237
Wilson MC, Hayward R, Tunis SR et al for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (1995) Users’ Guides to the medical literature. VIII. How to use clinical practice guidelines. B. What are the recommendations and will they help me in caring for my patients? JAMA 274:1630–1632
Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ for the Evidence-based Medicine Working Group (1994) Users’ guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. Part B. What were the results and will they help me in caring for my patients. JAMA 271: 59–63
Kilbourn RG (1997) Evidence based medicine in critical care: Will it takes us over the cutting edge? Crit Care Med 25:1448–1449
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer-Verlag Italia
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jaeschke, R., Guyatt, G., Meade, M. (1999). Evidence-Based Medicine in the ICU. In: Gullo, A. (eds) Anaesthesia, Pain, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine — A.P.I.C.E.. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2145-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2145-7_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Milano
Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0051-3
Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2145-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive