Skip to main content

Riassunto

A partire dalla sua introduzione — avvenuta nel lontano 1972 — la TC ha registrato un progressivo sviluppo della propria tecnologia e delle applicazioni in ambito medico, resistendo alla concorrenza di altre metodiche diagnostiche introdotte successivamente, quali l’ecografia e la risonanza magnetica. Negli anni Ottanta, infatti, lo sviluppo di queste ultime due metodiche indusse numerosi studiosi a preconizzare “la morte della TC”, senza attribuire particolare importanza alle trasformazioni già in atto nella TC, come l’introduzione della tecnologia slip ring. In realtà, l’enorme avanzamento tecnologico della TC nell’ultimo ventennio dimostra chiaramente che si tratta di una metodica di imaging in piena salute, che rappresenta uno dei capisaldi della moderna diagnostica per immagini [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia

  1. Kalender WA (2006) Computed Tomography: Fundamentals, Systems technology, Image quality, Applications. Publicis MCD Verlag, Erlangen — Munich

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brock DC (2006) Understanding Moore’s law — four decades of innovation. Chemical Heritage Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hurlock GS, Higashino H, Mochizuki T (2009) History of cardiac computed tomography: single to 320-detector row multislice computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25 Suppl 1:31–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barnes E (2008) Fourth-generation MDCT scanners do cardiac differently. http://www.auntminnie. com/index.asp?Sec=sup&Sub=cto&Pag=dis&ItemId=81632&wf=1236

    Google Scholar 

  5. Klass O, Kleinhans S, Walker MJ et al (2010) Coronary plaque imaging with 256-slice multidetector computed tomography: interobserver variability of volumetric lesion parameters with semiautomatic plaque analysis software. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging [Epub ahead of print], doi 10.1007/s10554-010-9614-3

    Google Scholar 

  6. Geleijns J, Salvadó Artells M, de Bruin PW et al (2009) Computed tomography dose assessment for a 160 mm wide, 320 detector row, cone beam CT scanner. Phys Med Biol 54:3141–3159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Miles KA, Cuénod CA (2007) Multidetector computed tomography in oncology. CT perfusion imaging. Informa Healthcare, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. Axel L (1980) Cerebral blood flow determination by rapid-sequence computed tomography: theoretical analysis. Radiology 137:679–686

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Miles KA (1999) Tumour angiogenesis and its relation to contrast enhancement on computed tomography: a review. Eur J Radiol 30:198–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee TY (2002) Functional CT: physiological models. Trends Biotechnol 20:S3–S10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee TY, Purdie TG, Stewart E (2003) CT imaging of angiogenesis. Q J Nucl Med 47:171–187

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Faggioni L, Neri E, Bartolozzi C (2010) CT perfusion of head and neck tumors: how we do it. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:62–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Miles KA (2006) Perfusion imaging with computed tomography: brain and beyond. Eur Radiol 16 Suppl 7:M37–43

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kalender WA, Kryiakou Y (2007) Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT). Eur Radiol 17: 2767–2779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gupta R, Cheung AC, Bartling SH et al (2008) Flat-panel volume CT: fundamental principles, technology, and applications. Radiographics 28:2009–2022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Buzug TM(2008) Computed Tomography.FromPhoton Statistics toModern Cone-Beam CT.Springer-Verlag, Berlin — Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tanaka R, Sanada S, Fujimura M et al (2009) Pulmonary blood flow evaluation using a dynamic flat-panel detector: feasibility study with pulmonary diseases. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 4:449–455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dörfler A, Struffert T, Engelhorn T, Richter G (2008) Rotational flat-panel computed tomography in diagnostic and interventional neuroradiology. Rofo 180:891–898

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Engelhorn T, Struffert T, Richter G et al (2008) Flat panel detector angiographic CT in the management of aneurysmal rupture during coil embolization. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29:1581–1584

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Struffert T, Doelken M, Adamek E et al (2010) Flat-detector computed tomography with intravenous contrast material application in experimental aneurysms: comparison with multislice CT and conventional angiography. Acta Radiol 51:431–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Struffert T, Eyupoglu IY, Huttner HB et al (2010) Clinical evaluation of flat-panel detector compared with multislice computed tomography in 65 patients with acute intracranial hemorrhage: initial results. J Neurosurg [Epub ahead of print], doi 10.3171/2010.2.JNS091054

    Google Scholar 

  22. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography — an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lauer MS (2009) Elements of danger — the case of medical imaging. N Engl J Med 361:841–843

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A et al (2010) Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:191–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Brenner DJ (2005) Is it time to retire the CTDI for CT quality assurance and dose optimization? Med Phys 32:3225–3226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fayngersh V, Passero M (2009) Estimating radiation risk from computed tomography scanning. Lung 187:143–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Royal HD (2008) Effects of low level radiation-what’s new? Semin Nucl Med 38:392–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Paolicchi, F., Faggioni, L., Neri, E. (2010). Sviluppi futuri in TC. In: Elementi di tomografia computerizzata. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1697-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1697-2_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1696-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1697-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics