Skip to main content

Technical Innovations in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Pelvic Floor

  • Chapter
Pelvic Floor Disorders

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an excellent tool for understanding the complex anatomy of the pelvic floor and for assessing pelvic floor disorders. Using appropriate imaging protocols, the anatomy of the pelvic floor can be visualized in great detail, without exposing the patient to harmful ionizing radiation. Dynamic MRI allows detection and characterization of functional pelvic floor abnormalities. In this chapter, we review the technical aspects of static and dynamic pelvic floor MRI. We focus on recent technical developments in pelvic floor MRI, which enable a global and integrated approach to the pelvic floor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Stoker J, Halligan S, Bartram CI. Pelvic floor imaging. Radiology 2001;218:621–641.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chou CP, Levenson RB, Elsayes KM et al. Imaging of female urethral diverticulum: an update. Radiographics 2008; 28:1917–1930.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Merkle EM, Dale BM, Paulson EK. Abdominal MR imaging at 3T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2006;14:17–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Merkle EM, Dale BM. Abdominal MRI at 3.0 T: the basics revisited. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:1524–1532.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goei R. Anorectal function in patients with defecation disorders and asymptomatic subjects: evaluation with defecography. Radiology 1990;174:121–123.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bertschinger KM, Hetzer FH, Roos JE et al. Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor performed with patient sitting in an open-magnet unit versus with patient supine in a closedmagnet unit. Radiology 2002;223:501–508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Healy JC, Halligan S, Reznek RH et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvic floor in patients with obstructed defaecation. Br J Surg 1997;84:1555–1558.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lienemann A, Fischer T. Functional imaging of the pelvic floor. Eur J Radiol 2003;47:117–122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang A, Mostwin JL, Rosenshein NB, Zerhouni EA. Pelvic floor descent in women: dynamic evaluation with fast MR imaging and cinematic display. Radiology 1991;179:25–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Halligan S, Malouf A, Bartram CI et al. Predictive value of impaired evacuation at proctography in diagnosing anismus. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:633–636.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Karlbom U, Nilsson S, Pahlman L, Graf W. Defecographic study of rectal evacuation in constipated patients and control subjects. Radiology 1999;210:103–108.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maglinte DD, Bartram C. Dynamic imaging of posterior compartment pelvic floor dysfunction by evacuation proctography: techniques, indications, results and limitations. Eur J Radiol 2007;61:454–461.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bartram CI, Turnbull GK, Lennard-Jones JE. Evacuation proctography: an investigation of rectal expulsion in 20 subjects without defecatory disturbance. Gastrointest Radiol 1988;13:72–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Solopova AE, Hetzer FH, Marincek B, Weishaupt D. MR defecography: prospective comparison of two rectal enema compositions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:W118–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fletcher JG, Busse RF, Riederer SJ et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of anatomic and dynamic defects of the pelvic floor in defecatory disorders. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98:399–411.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kelvin FM, Maglinte DD, Hale DS, Benson JT. Female pelvic organ prolapse: a comparison of triphasic dynamic MR imaging and triphasic fluoroscopic cystocolpoproctography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:81–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lienemann A, Anthuber C, Baron A et al. Dynamic MR colpocystorectography assessing pelvic-floor descent. Eur Radiol 1997;7:1309–1317.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vanbeckevoort D, Van Hoe L, Oyen R et al. Pelvic floor descent in females: comparative study of colpocystodefecography and dynamic fast MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9:373–377.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dvorkin LS, Hetzer F, Scott SM et al. Open-magnet MR defaecography compared with evacuation proctography in the diagnosis and management of patients with rectal intussusception. Colorectal Dis 2004;6:45–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hetzer FH, Andreisek G, Tsagari C et al. MR defecography in patients with fecal incontinence: imaging findings and their effect on surgical management. Radiology 2006; 240:449–457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Roos JE, Weishaupt D, Wildermuth S et al. Experience of 4 years with open MR defecography: pictorial review of anorectal anatomy and disease. Radiographics 2002;22:817–832.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ferrante SL, Perry RE, Schreiman JS et al. The reproducibility of measuring the anorectal angle in defecography. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:51–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Penninckx F, Debruyne C, Lestar B, Kerremans R. Observer variation in the radiological measurement of the anorectal angle. Int J Colorectal Dis 1990;5:94–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Choi JS, Wexner SD, Nam YS et al. Intraobserver and interobserver measurements of the anorectal angle and perineal descent in defecography. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:1121–1126.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Comiter CV, Vasavada SP, Barbaric ZL et al. Grading pelvic prolapse and pelvic floor relaxation using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Urology 1999;54:454–457.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Boyadzhyan L, Raman SS, Raz S. Role of static and dynamic MR imaging in surgical pelvic floor dysfunction. Radiographics 2008;28:949–967.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weishaupt, D., Reiner, C.S. (2010). Technical Innovations in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Pelvic Floor. In: Santoro, G.A., Wieczorek, A.P., Bartram, C.I. (eds) Pelvic Floor Disorders. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1542-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1542-5_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1541-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1542-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics