Skip to main content

Abstract

The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) predicts a linear relation between assets’ return and their betas. However, there is empirical evidence that such a relationship does not necessarily occur, and in some cases it might even be nonlinear. In this paper we explore a nonparametric approach where the linear specification is tested against a nonparametric alternative. This methodology is implemented on S&P500 data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ang, A., Chen, J.: Capital market equilibrium with restricted borrowing. J. Emp. Finan. 14, 1–40 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bosq, D.: Nonparametric Statistics for Stochastic Processes, vol. 110, Lecture Notes in Statistics. Springer, New York (1998)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, S.X., Gao, J.: An adaptive empirical likelihood test for time series models. J. Econometrics 141, 950–972 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, S., Qin, Y.S.: Empirical likelihood confidence intervals for local linear smoothers. Biometrika 87, 946–953 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Elton, E.J., Gruber, M.J., Brown, S.J., Goetzmann, W.N.: Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis. John Wiley, New York, 6th edition (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fama, E., French, K.R.: The cross-section of expected stock returns. J. Finan. 47, 427–465 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fama, E., MacBeth, J.: Risk, return and equilibrium: empirical tests. J. Pol. Econ. 81, 607–636 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Härdle, W., Chen, S., Li, M.: An empirical likelihood goodness-of-fit test for time series. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 65, 663–678 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Härdle, W., Mammen, E.: Comparing nonparametric versus parametric regression fits. Ann. Stat. 21, 1926–1947 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Horowitz, J.L., Spokoiny, V.G.: An adaptive, rate-optimal test of a parametric mean-regression model against a nonparametric alternative. Econometrica 69, 599–631 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Jagannathan, R., Wang, Z.: The CAPM is alive and well. J. Finan. 51, 3–53 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kreiss, J., Neumann, M.H., Yao, Q.: Bootstrap tests for simple structures in nonparametric time series regression. Discussion paper. Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin, Berlin (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Owen, A.B.: Empirical Likelihood. Chapman & Hall, London (2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Roll, R.W.: A critique of the asset pricing theory’s tests. J. Finan. Econ. 4, 129–176 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this paper

Cite this paper

Coretto, P., Lucia Parrella, M. (2010). Empirical likelihood based nonparametric testing for CAPM. In: Corazza, M., Pizzi, C. (eds) Mathematical and Statistical Methods for Actuarial Sciences and Finance. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1481-7_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics