Abstract
The finite supply of transportation fuels has generated renewed interest to improve their performance in power and propulsion devices. However, the complexity of real fuels prohibits developing their combustion chemistries and property databases needed for simulating performance in engines to identify operational regimes for improving fuel efficiency. Surrogates offer the means to address these concerns if they can be shown to replicate certain combustion targets of the real fuel, and to result in combustion properties similar to real fuels when burned in a suitable configuration that is amenable to detailed numerical modeling. This paper examines the role which droplet combustion can play in the development of surrogates for complex transportation fuels. Recognizing that spray combustion is far too difficult to model and that droplets represent the fine-grid structure of sprays, the combustion dynamics of fuel droplets are examined in an environment that seeks to remove external convective influences to simplify the transport field and produce spherical symmetry in the droplet burning process that can be modeled using a detailed numerical simulation approach. The one-dimensional flames and transport dynamics that result are shown to be well positioned to evaluate the efficacy of surrogate fuel performance. Recent efforts are summarized that have used the spherical droplet flame configuration to evaluate the performance of surrogate fuel blends. Experiments are discussed for promoting spherical symmetry, and results are presented to show the efficacy of some surrogate blends to replicate the performance of gasoline and jet fuels using the spherical droplet configuration. Some results are also included from detailed numerical modeling of biodiesel droplets that incorporate complex combustion chemistry, and unsteady transport, vaporization, and variable property effects that illustrate the potential for high fidelity predictions needed for developing surrogates using the spherically symmetric droplet flame configuration.
This paper is based on a presentation given at the Indo-US International Workshop on Novel Combustion for Sustainable Energy Development, Kanpur, India, January 2–4, 2014.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
A combustion “target” is defined here as a variable used for matching a surrogate with a real fuel (e.g., molecular weight, derived cetane number, liquid density). A combustion “property” is defined as a variable measured in a combustion configuration.
References
Amsden AA (1999) KIVA-3V, Release 2, Improvements to KIVA-3V, Los Alamos National Laboratory, report LA-UR-99-915
Avedisian CT (1997) Soot formation in spherically symmetric droplet combustion. In: Physical and chemical aspects of combustion, Chap. 6. Gordon and Breach, New York pp 135–160
Avedisian CT (2008) Surrogate fuel development: the role of droplet burning. Paper no. IMECE2008-68748, proceedings of IMECE2008, ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, Boston, Massachusetts, Oct 31–Nov 6 2008
Avedisian CT, Callahan BJ (2000) Combustion of nonane/hexanol mixture droplets in microgravity. Proc Combust Inst 28:991–997
Avedisian CT, Jackson GS (2000) Soot patterns around suspended n-heptane droplet flames in a convection-free environment. J Propul Power 16:974–979
Avedisian CT, Yang JC, Wang CH (1988) On low gravity droplet combustion. Proc Roy Soc Lond A420:183–200
Banu B (2008) Fluids and combustion facility (FCF) and combustion integrated rack (CIR). Payload Accommodations Handbook CIR-DOC-4064, NASA John H, Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio
Bieleveld T, Frassoldati A, Cuoci A, Faravelli T, Ranzi E, Niemann U (2009) Experimental and kinetic modeling study of combustion of gasoline, its surrogates and components in laminar non-premixed flows. Proc Combust Inst 32:493–500
Chao BH, Law CK, T’ien JS (1990) Structure and extinction of diffusion flames with flame radiation, extinction of diffusion flames with flame radiation. Proc Combust Inst 23:523–531
Chaos M, Zhao Z, Kazakov A, Gokulakrishnan P, Angioletti M, Dryer FL (2007) A PRF+ toluene surrogate fuel model for simulating gasoline kinetics. Paper no. E26, 5th US National combustion meeting, Western States Section, Combustion Institute, 25–28 Mar 2007
Choi BC, Choi SK, Chung SH (2011) Soot formation characteristics of gasoline surrogate fuels in counterflow diffusion flames. Proc Combust Inst 33:609–616
Colket M, Edwards T, Williams S, Cernansky NP, Miller DL, Egolfopoulos F, Linstedt P, Seshadri K, Dryer FL, Law CK, Friend D, Lenhert DB, Pitsch H, Sarofim A, Smooke M, Tsang W (2007) Development of an experimental database and kinetic models for surrogate jet fuels. Paper no. AIAA2007-770, 45th aerospace sciences meeting, Reno, 8–11 Jan 2007
Cuoci A, Mehl M, Buzzi-Ferraris G, Faravelli T, Manca D, Ranzi E (2005) Autoignition and burning rates of fuel droplets under microgravity. Combust Flame 143(2005):221–226
Dagaut P, Togbe C (2008) Oxidation kinetics of butanol–gasoline surrogate mixtures in a jet-stirred reactor: Experimental and modeling study. Fuel 87:3313–3321
Dembia CL, Liu YC, Avedisian CT (2012) Automated data analysis of consecutive digital images from droplet combustion experiments by a MATAB-based algorithm. Image Anal Stereology 31:137–148
Dietrich DL, Nayagam V, Hicks MC, Ferkul PV, Dryer FL, Farouk T, Shaw BD, Suh HK, Choi MY, Liu YC, Avedisian CT, Williams FA (2014) Droplet combustion experiments aboard the International Space Station. Microgravity Sci Technol. doi:10.1007/s12217-014-9372-2 (open access)
Dievart P, Won SH, Dooley S, Dryler FL, Ju Y (2012) A kinetic model for methyl decanoate combustion. Combust Flame 159:1793–1805
Dirks LC, Dirks GW, Wu J (2012) Evolving perspectives on biofuels in the United States. Front Energy 6:379–393
Dooley S, Won SH, Chaos M, Heyne J, Ju Y, Dryer FL, Kumar K, Sung CJ, Wang H, Oehlschlaeger MA, Santoro RJ, Litzinger TA (2010) A jet fuel surrogate formulated by real fuel properties. Combust Flame 157:2333–2339
Dooley S, Won SH, Jahangirian SJUY, JU Y, Dryer FL, Wang H, Oehlschlaeger MA (2012) The combustion kinetics of a synthetic paraffinic jet aviation fuel and a fundamentally formulated experimentally validated surrogate fuel. Combust Flame 159:3014–3020
Edwards T, Maurice LQ (2001) Surrogate mixtures to represent complex aviation and rocket fuels. J Propul Power 17:461–466
Fahd EA, Liu YC, Avedisian CT, Dryer FL, Farouk TI (2014) A detailed numerical simulation of spherically symmetric n-butanol droplet combustion and comparisons with experimental data. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, vol 35 (in press)
Farouk T, Dryer FL (2013) Isolated alkane droplet combustion in microgravity: cool flames. Paper no.: 1G17, 8th U.S. National combustion meeting, Combustion Institute, Park City, Utah, 19–22 May 2013
Farouk TI, Liu YC, Avedisian CT, Dryer FL (2013) Sub-millimeter sized methyl butanoate droplet combustion: Microgravity experiments and detailed numerical modeling. Proc Combust Inst 34:1609–1616
Farrell JT, Cernansky NP, Dryer FL, Friend DG, Hergart CA, Law CK, McDavid RM, Mueller CJ, Patel AK, Pitsch H (2007) Development of an experimental database and kinetic models for surrogate diesel fuels. SAE paper no. 2007-01-0201
FR (2012) Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, vol 77(199), pp 62623–63200, 15 Oct 2012
Gauthier BM, Davidson DF, Hanson RK (2004) Shock tube determination of ignition delay times in full-blend surrogate fuel mixtures. Combust Flame 139:300–311
Hara H, Kumagai S (1990) Experimental investigation of free droplet combustion under microgravity. Proc Combust Inst 23:1605–1610
Huber ML, Lemmon EW, Bruno TJ (2010) Surrogate mixture models for the thermophysical properties of aviation fuel Jet-A. Energy Fuels 24:3565–3571
Jackson GS, Avedisian CT (1998) Combustion of unsupported water-in-heptane emulsion droplets in a convection-free environment. Int J Heat Mass Transf 41:2503–2515
Jackson GS, Avedisian CT, Yang JC (1991) Soot formation during combustion of unsupported methanol/toluene mixture droplets in microgravity. Proc Roy Soc Lond A435:359–368
Lee CH, Reitz RD (2013) A comparative study on CFD simulation of spray penetration between gas jet and standard KIVA-3V spray model over a wide range of ambient gas densities. J Mech Sci Technol 26:4014–4025
Lee Y, Jang K, Han K, Huh KY (2013) Simulation of a heavy duty diesel engine fueled with soybean biodiesel blends in low temperature combustion. SAE paper no. 2013-01-1100
Liu YC, Avedisian CT (2012) A comparison of the burning characteristics of sub-millimeter droplets of binary mixtures of iso-octane, n-heptane and toluene with a commercial unleaded gasoline. Combust Flame 159:770–783
Liu YC, Farouk TI, Savas AJ, Dryer FL (2013a) On the spherically symmetrical combustion of methyl decanoate droplets and comparisons with detailed numerical modeling. Combust Flame 160:641–655
Liu YC, Savas AJ, Avedisian CT (2013b) Spherically symmetric droplet combustion of three and four component miscible mixtures as surrogates for Jet-A. Proc Combust Inst 34:1569–1576
Liu YC, Rah JK, Trenou KN, Hicks MC, Avedisian CT (2014a) Experimental study of initial diameter effects on convection-free droplet combustion in the standard atmosphere for n-heptane, n-octane and n-decane: International Space Station and ground-based experiments. Paper no. AIAA-2014-1019, 52nd aerospace sciences meeting, National Harbor, Md., 13–17 Jan 2014
Liu YC, Xu Y, Hicks MC (2014b) The role of micro-convection induced by support fiber in droplet Combustion processes. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, vol 35 (in press)
Mueller CJ, Cannella WJ, Bruno TJ, Bunting B, Dettman HD, Franz JA, Huber ML, Natarajan M, Pitz WJ, Ratcliff MA (2012) Methodology for formulating diesel surrogate fuels with accurate compositional, ignition-quality, and volatility characteristics. Energy Fuels 26:3284–3303
Narayanaswamy K, Pepiot P, Pitsch H (2013) Jet fuels and Fischer-Tropsch fuels: surrogate definition and chemical kinetic modeling. Paper # 070RK-0273, Western States section meeting, Combustion Institute, 19–22 May 2013
Nayagam V, Dietrich DL, Ferkul PV, Hicks MC, Williams FA (2012) Can cool flames support quasi-steady alkane droplet burning? Combust Flame 159:3583–3588
NSF (2011) Transforming combustion research through cyberinfrastructure. Committee on Building Cyberinfrastructure for Combustion Research, National Research Council, The National Academies Press. ISBN-13: 978-0-309-16387-3, April (http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13049)
Okajima S, Kumagai S (1975) Further investigations of combustion of free droplets in a freely falling chamber including moving droplets. Proc Combust Inst 15:401–407
Pitz WJ, Mueller CJ (2011) Recent progress in the development of diesel surrogate fuels. Prog Energy Combust Sci 37:330–350
Pitz JW, Cernansky NP, Dryer FL, Egolfopoulos FN, Farrell JT, Friend DG, Pitsch H (2007) Development of an experimental database and chemical kinetic models for surrogate gasoline fuels. SAE paper no. 2007-01-0175
PRECISE (2011) U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy and Science, March 3. http://www1.eere.energy.gov/vehiclesandfuels/pdfs/presice_rpt.pdf
Robbins J, Shinn C (2010) Multi-user droplet combustion apparatus FLEX-2. Reflight Safety Data Package MDC-DOC-1790A, NASA John H. Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio
Sirignano WA (1999) Fluid dynamics and transport of droplets and sprays. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Tsang W (2003) Workshop on combustion simulation databases for real transportation fuels, report no. NISTIR 7155, National Institute of Standard and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 4–5 Sept 2003
USEIA (2014) U.S. Energy Information Administration, Independent Statistics and Analysis. March. http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/steo/pdf/uncertainty.pdf
Wang H, Reitz JD, Yao M, Yang B, Jiao Q, Qiu L (2013) Development of an n-heptane-n-butanol PAH mechanism and its application for combustion and soot production. Combust Flame 160:504–519
Werler M, Cancino LR, Schiessl R, Mass U, Schulz C, Fikri M (2014) Ignition delay times of diethyl ether measured in a high-pressure shock tube and a rapid compression machine. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, vol 35 (in press)
Yahyaoui M, Djeballi-Chaumeix N, Dagaut P, Paillard CE, Gail S (2007) Experimental and modeling study of gasoline surrogate mixtures oxidation in jet stirred reactor and shock tube. Proc Combust Inst 31:385–391
Zhang HR, Eddings EG, Sarofim AD (2007) Criteria for selection of components for surrogates of natural gas and transportation fuels. Proc Combust Inst 31:401–409
Acknowledgments
Preparation of this paper was supported in part by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration grant no. NNX08AI51G with Mr. Michael Hicks as the project monitor. The author also benefitted from discussions with Dr. Y.C Liu of the University of Michigan-Flint and Mr. Yuhao Xu of Cornell University. The author is pleased to acknowledge this essential help in the course of his work on droplet combustion processes.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer India
About this paper
Cite this paper
Avedisian, C.T. (2014). Developing Surrogates for Liquid Transportation Fuels: The Role of Spherically Symmetric Droplet Combustion. In: Agarwal, A., Pandey, A., Gupta, A., Aggarwal, S., Kushari, A. (eds) Novel Combustion Concepts for Sustainable Energy Development. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2211-8_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2211-8_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2210-1
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2211-8
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)