Skip to main content

Performance of Laced Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete (LRGPC) Beams Under Monotonic Loading

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Structural Engineering

Abstract

This paper describes the ductility behavior of Laced Reinforced Geopolymer concrete beam (LRGPC). Laced Reinforced Concrete (LRC) construction techniques are widely used in blast resistant design and seismic resistant design of structures. LRC structural element consists of equal reinforcement in tension and compression faces along with lacings. Lacing is a form of continuous shear reinforcements as compared to the form of conventional stirrup reinforcement. It is placed in the plane of principal bending and anchored in position by means of transverse bars. LRC enhances the ductility and provide better concrete confinement. In general, ductile failure of Reinforced Concrete (RC) beams with conventional stirrups is not possible when the shear span-to-depth ratio is less than 2.5 due to the influence of severe diagonal cracking. Improved ductile failure of such members can be achieved by proper detailing of reinforcement with inclined bars in the case of normal concrete mix, and also by improving the tensile strength and ultimate strain of concrete with help of steel fibers. Portland cement (PC) is widely used as binder material for concrete in a wide variety of constructions. However, this cement is proving to be ecologically hazardous material due to its inherent high internal energy content besides occurrence of emission of large quantities of carbon dioxide during its production. Therefore, there has been search for alternative binder material. Geopolymer is a type of binder that can be obtained by activating silicon dioxide and aluminium oxides present in industrial wastes such as blast furnace slag powder and fly ash, to form inorganic polymer binder system. Monotonic load testing on two specimens with 45° lacing are conducted. Experimental results indicate that both the beams exhibit almost similar strength performance. Response of LRGPC, LRC and conventional RC beams are compared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Davidovits J (1991) Geopolymers: inorganic polymeric new materials. J Therm Anal 37:1633–1656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hardjito D, Rangan BV (2005) Development and properties of low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Research report GC-1, Faculty of Engineering, Curtin University of Technology, Curtin, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  3. IS 12089 (1987) Specification for granulated slag for manufacture of Portland slag cement, (R2008). BIS, New Delhi, India

    Google Scholar 

  4. IS 2386 (Part I) (1963) Indian standard code for methods of tests for aggregates for concrete. BIS, New Delhi, India

    Google Scholar 

  5. IS 3812 (2003) Indian standard code for specification for fly ash for use as pozzolana and ad-mixture. BIS, New Delhi, India

    Google Scholar 

  6. IS 456 (2000) Indian standard code for plain and reinforced concrete-code of practice, 4th revision. BIS, New Delhi, India

    Google Scholar 

  7. Keiger SA, Woodson SC, Dallriva FD (1989) Role of shear reinforcement in large-deflection behavior. ACI Struct J 86(6):664–671

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lakshmanan N, Parameshwaran VS, Krishnamoorthy TS, Balasubramanian K (1991) Ductility of flexural member reinforced symmetrically on the tension and compression faces. Indian Concr J 84–93

    Google Scholar 

  9. TM 5-1300 (1984) Structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions. Department of Army, Navy and the Air force, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

Bibliography

  1. Anandavalli N, Lakshmanan N, Iyer NR, Prakash A, Ramajaneyulu K, Rajasankar J (2010) Design of a laced reinforced concrete (LRC) storage structure based on unit risk principle with reduced separation distance. In: National conference on safety technology and management in defence (NCSTM-10), CFEES, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lakshmanan N (2008) Laced reinforced concrete construction technique for blast resistant design of structures. Sixth structural engineering convention (SEC2008), Chennai, India

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rao SB, Sarma BS, Lakshmanan N, Stangenberg F (1998) Damage model for reinforced concrete elements under cyclic loading. ACI Mater J 95(6):682–690

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rao SP, Sharma BS, Lakshmanan N, Stangeneberg F (1996) Seismic behavior of laced reinforced concrete beams. In: 11th world conference on earthquake engineering, Paper no. 1740

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sarma SB (1997) Investigations on laced reinforced concrete beams with normal and fibre reinforced concrete under monotonic and cyclic loading. Ph.D. thesis, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sujatha K, Nagan K (2013) Strength and behaviour of reinforced geopolymer concrete short columns. J Struct Eng 39(6):657–663 (Thiagarajar College of Engineering, Madurai)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is being published with the permission of the Director, CSIR-Structural Engineering Research Centre, Chennai. The cooperation and guidance received from, Dr K. Muthumani Advanced Seismic Testing and Research laboratory and the technical staff of Advanced Materials Laboratory of CSIR-SERC are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. K. Madheswaran .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer India

About this paper

Cite this paper

Madheswaran, C.K., Gnanasundar, G., Gopalakrishnan, N. (2015). Performance of Laced Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete (LRGPC) Beams Under Monotonic Loading. In: Matsagar, V. (eds) Advances in Structural Engineering. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2190-6_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2190-6_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2189-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2190-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics