Skip to main content

Oil Price Shock, Pass-Through Policy and its Impact on India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Market, Regulations and Finance

Abstract

This paper analyses the impact of transmission of international oil prices and domestic oil price pass-through policy on major macroeconomic variables in India with the help of a macroeconomic policy simulation model. Three major channels of transmission of oil price shock viz. import channel, price channel, and fiscal channel are explored within a structural macroeconomic framework. The policy options of gradual deregulation of domestic oil prices in the scenario of occurrence of a one-time shock in international oil prices as well as no oil price shock situation are analysed for their impact on growth, inflation, fiscal balances and external balances during the 12th Plan period of 2012–2013 to 2016–2017. The simulation results indicate that in the short run the deregulation policy would have adverse impact on the growth as well as on the inflation. But if this policy is complemented with the policy of switching of subsidy bill to capital expenditure it might result in positive growth effects in the long run. Given, the current pass-through policy, a 10 % rise in oil prices result in a 0.6 % fall in growth while in the full pass-through situation, it can reduce the growth by 0.9 percentage point on an average. Overall, the paper demonstrates that the extent of pass-through has differential impact on growth and inflation over the 12th Plan period. Hence, the policy priority of oil price deregulation must be carefully weighed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The under recovery of oil marketing companies is the difference between administered domestic price and trade parity price of oil multiplied by the quantity sold. Under recoveries are financed by absorption by the oil companies, the oil bonds and the government subsidies. If the government has to compensate the oil companies fully for their under recovery, then the subsidy bill of the government becomes equal to total under recovery. Between 2004–2005 to 2009–2010, the companies were allowed to float special oil bonds with sovereign guarantee for covering up part of their under recoveries. (see Table 13.1) Since 2010, these oil bonds have become part of the fiscal deficit in the Central government budget. Therefore, effectively the under recoveries have become equivalent to oil subsidy barring the component of under recovery, which is absorbed by the oil companies themselves.

    There are serious conceptual problems in both the understanding of under-recoveries as well as in their estimation. (See Report of the B.K. Chaturvedi Committee on the Financial Positions of the Oil Companies, GOI 2008; Sethi 2010)

  2. 2.

    About three-fourth of the total revenues from oil are due to revenues collected from indirect taxes, mainly customs, excise and sales taxes. While excise duties and countervailing duty is levied as specific duty, the sales tax is an ad valorem tax. The sales tax is collected by the State governments and other revenues accrue in the Central exchequer. The rest one-fourth of revenue from this sector consists of dividends of PSUs, corporate tax and so on, which essentially accrues to the Central government exchequer.

  3. 3.

    Refer to Bhanumurthy et al. (2012) for the flow diagram of the complete model.

  4. 4.

    In the following system of equations the notation convention adopted is to denote all exogenous variables with a bar \([\bar{x}]\), all policy variables with a hat \([\hat{x}]\), and growth rates with a dot \([\dot{x}]\).

  5. 5.

    The inflation in administered price component of WPI has been calculated in the following manner. We have considered six main broad commodity groups—viz. cereals, fertiliser, iron & steel, mineral oil, electricity and coal from the WPI basket—prices of which are significantly influenced by the government (if not controlled directly). We calculate the relative weights of each commodity group by dividing their respective weights in the overall WPI basket by the total weight of all these six commodity groups taken together – separately considering 1980–81 base for the years 1990–1991 to 1993–1994, considering 1993–1994 base for 1994–1995 to 2004–2005 and considering 2004–2005 base for the years 2005–2006 onwards. The relative weights remain constant for each commodity groups unless the base changes. We apply simple splicing technique to calculate a long time series of index numbers of the wholesale prices for each of the six administered commodity groups. Now we add the index numbers of each group multiplied by their respective relative weights to get a continuous series of composite index numbers from 1990–1991 to 2010–2011. The annual percentage changes in these index numbers give us the weighted average annual inflation in prices of administered commodities.

References

  • Bernanke BS (1983) Irreversibility, uncertainty, and cyclical investment. Q J Econ 98:85–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhanumurthy NR, Das S, Bose S (2012) Oil price shock, pass-through policy and its impact on the Indian economy. NIPFP Working Paper, 2012-99

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn MG (2000) Perfect competition and the effects of energy price increases on economic activity. J Money Credit Bank 32:400–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government of India (2006) Report of the committee on pricing and taxation of petroleum products. Chairman: C. Rangarajan, February

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India (2008) Report of the high powered committee on financial position of oil companies. Chairman: B.K. Chaturvedi

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India (2010) Report of the expert group on a viable and sustainable system of pricing of petroleum products. Chairman: Kirit S. Parikh, February

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India (2010a) Report of the 13th finance commission. Chairman: Vijay Kelkar

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton JD (1983) Oil and the Macroeconomy since World War II. J Polit Econ 91(2):228–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha S, Mundle S (1987) Inflationary implications of resource mobilization through administered price increases. Econ Polit Wkly 22(33):1394–1409

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein LR, Goldberger AS (1955) An econometric model of the United States 1929–1952. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundle S, Bhanumurthy NR, Das S (2011) Fiscal consolidation with high growth: a policy simulation model for India. Econ Model 28(6):2657–2668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakshit M (2005) Oil price shock: some analytical and policy perspectives. Econ Polit Wkly 40(42):4494–4496

    Google Scholar 

  • Reserve Bank of India (2011) Price situation in India. Reserve Bank India Bull 65(5):636–645

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi S (2010) Analysing the parikh committee report on pricing of petroleum products. Econ Polit Wkly 45(13):56–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen J (1967) Economic policy: principles and design. North Holland Publishing, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2008) Current trends and Issues in the World Economy. Trade Dev Rep 1–14

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Sudipto Mundle and M Govinda Rao for their valuable advice and support throughout the preparation of the chapter. Earlier draft of this chapter was presented at NIPFP, SANEI conference in Dhaka, QRE conference at NCAER and at 48th Annual conference of the Indian Econometric Society held in Puducherry. We would like to thank participants at these presentations and their valuable comments, especially Pulapre Balakrishnan, Renu Kohli, Kirit Parikh, Kavita Rao, Ramprasad Sengupta, Shekhar Shah, Dilip Nachane, NSS Narayana, Balwant Singh, S. R. Osmani Parthasarathi Shome and Mukesh Anand. We acknowledge the financial support from the South Asia Network of Economic Research Institutes (SANEI) for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Surajit Das .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Das, S., Bose, S., Bhanumurthy, N. (2014). Oil Price Shock, Pass-Through Policy and its Impact on India. In: Khasnabis, R., Chakraborty, I. (eds) Market, Regulations and Finance. India Studies in Business and Economics. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1795-4_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics